Laserfiche WebLink
EUGENE CITY COUNCIL <br />AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY <br /> <br /> Work Session: Toxics Right-to-Know Program Fees <br /> <br />Meeting Date: January 10, 2005 Agenda Item Number: B <br />Department: Fire & EMS Staff Contact: Glen Potter <br />www. cl. eugene, or. us Contact Telephone Number: 682-7118 <br /> <br />ISSUE STATEMENT <br />The Eugene Toxics Right-to-Know Program is funded by fees assessed to local businesses that are <br />hazardous substance users. A state-imposed fee cap of $2,000 per facility took effect last year, resulting <br />in a substantial fee increase for smaller participating businesses while reducing fees for larger <br />businesses. The council directed the Toxics Board to return with a proposed remedy for this perceived <br />inequity in time for the 2005 program billing cycle. <br /> <br />In response to the council's direction, the Toxics Board is proposing two methods of addressing the <br />perceived fee inequity. One is an ordinance that would add certain types of businesses to the program, <br />thus spreading the overall fee burden over a larger group of businesses and presumably reducing it for <br />each participating business (the proposed ordinance is attached). As an alternative or in addition to the <br />proposed ordinance, the Toxics Board is also proposing a surcharge on commercial solid waste hauling <br />fees in the city. <br /> <br />The Toxics Board voted unanimously to forward both of these proposals to the council, but requested <br />that the council be made aware that the right-to-know advocates on the board prefer to add businesses to <br />the program, while the business representatives on the board prefer the waste hauling surcharge. This is <br />because the right-to-know faction on the board views the current fee situation as an opportunity to <br />require additional public reporting of hazardous substance use, while the business faction would prefer <br />not to see any additional reporting required. <br /> <br />A third course of action to address the perceived fee inequity would be to pursue a legislative solution <br />consisting of a repeal of the cap. The Toxics Board and City Council are already on record in support of <br />such repeal, as stated in the City's 2005 Legislative Policies document. A principal point that the City <br />could make to the Legislature is that the fee cap, in its first year, had the effect of increasing fees for 62 <br />local companies and reducing them for 11. <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br />Through the citizen initiative process, Eugene voters amended the City Charter in 1996 to enact the <br />Toxics Right-to-Know Program (the "amendment"). Article VII, paragraph D of the amendment <br />requires that the Charter-created program be self-supporting. Fees have been assessed to each <br />participating business on the basis of full-time-equivalent (FTE) employees working at each business in <br />a calendar year. (Oregon courts have concluded that a program of this type may not assess fees based on <br /> <br /> L:\CMO\2005 Council Agendas\M050110\S050110B.doc <br /> <br /> <br />