Laserfiche WebLink
<br />expand the scope of the CSS process to include Middle Crest. <br /> <br />A Council work session was held on September 19, 2007 and continued to October 8, 2007 to provide <br />information on the City’s Design Standards and Guidelines for Eugene Streets, Sidewalks, Bikeways <br />and Accessways to aid the Council in deciding whether the design standard pertaining to minimum <br />travel lane width should be reduced from ten feet to nine feet in the Crest Drive Area. The Council <br />directed the City Manager to hold a public hearing on October 15, 2007 on a resolution to amend the <br />Design Standards and Guidelines for Eugene Streets, Sidewalks, Bikeways and Accessways to establish <br />a design standard minimum travel lane width of nine feet for the Crest Drive Area. <br /> <br />Context Sensitive Solutions Process History <br />After several months of work the members of the Crest Drive Community Team (CDCT) approved their <br />group operating agreements for the CSS process for the Crest Drive neighborhood. There are 21 <br />members of the CDCT including two City staff, Lisa Gardner, Planning Director and Mark Schoening, <br />City Engineer. The CDCT developed group agreements addressing decision-making, meetings, <br />communication and support. Each member of the CDCT signed the group agreements. The CDCT also <br />developed a mission statement that reads: <br /> <br />To recommend a street design for the identified sections of Crest Drive, Storey Boulevard, and <br />Friendly Street using the context sensitive solutions process while taking into consideration the <br />entire neighborhood context. <br /> <br />To support the design efforts of the CDCT the City conducted a topographic survey of all of the streets <br />under consideration, including all of the trees within the public right of way. The City’s survey crew <br />surveyed 15,846 data points including the existing edge of pavement, property corners, public and <br />private utilities, structures, and trees. All of this survey information was used to generate a set of maps <br />to aid in the street design process. <br /> <br />The design process involved City staff working with five separate street teams on five separate street <br />segments – Upper Crest, Middle Crest, Lower Crest, Storey and Friendly. Each street team presented its <br />conceptual design to the entire CDCT. As part of the design process each street team evaluated its <br />design using the Themes and Values developed and approved by the CDCT. <br /> <br />Over the course of two CDCT meetings on June 28 and July 12, the CDCT reached consensus on the <br />conceptual design for all five street segments. However, the CDCT did not reach agreement on the <br />overall design concept because of an outstanding issue regarding the minimum street width. Through a <br />consensus based decision process, the CDCT has determined that there are compelling reasons to <br />support a minimum street width of 18 feet (two nine-foot travel lanes). Reasons supporting the <br />recommendation include the CDCT’s themes and values regarding preserved neighborhood livability, <br />reduction of traffic speeds, efficient use of urban land in a rural setting, increased safety for all modes of <br />use and focus on a footprint that fits the neighborhood’s character. As such, an 18-foot street width is <br />perceived to be more consistent with the CDCT’s adopted themes and values than a 20-foot street width. <br />Based on these collaboratively developed values, it is the consensus recommendation of the CDCT to <br />pursue a legislative change to the minimum street width (18 feet rather than the prescribed minimum of <br />20 feet) prior to making a decision on the overall design concept. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />