Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />In January 2001, the council reinstated the MUPTE program with the new guidelines and adopted a <br />boundary area that was limited to the heart of downtown, substantially smaller than what had previously <br />existed. <br /> <br />In February 2003, the council recognized that no multi-family development occurred in the core area after <br />the moratorium took effect, and directed staff to return to City Council with proposed amendments to the <br />program as part of a series of “downtown tools”. (Broadway Place and High Street Terrace were <br />approved prior to the moratorium but constructed during the moratorium period.) <br /> <br />In July 2003, the council approved a small expansion of the MUPTE boundary to include the City’s <br />th <br />development site at 14 and Olive (the future home of the Tate Condominiums) and directed staff to <br />return at a later date with additional amendments to the program and boundary. <br /> <br />In early 2004, during multiple meetings, the council debated the merits of setting more specific and <br />stricter standards of quality for MUPTE recipients and settled on the current approach which provides a <br />range of options to be evaluated by the council prior to approval. The council agreed to expand the <br />boundary area for MUPTE-eligible housing and amended the rules to include quality standards and <br />increase public notification requirements. The amendments also eliminated an annual fee that was paid <br />into a low-income housing fund if at least 50 percent of the housing built was not low-income. Some <br />members of the council argued that charging the fee reduced the incentive and ability to construct higher <br />quality housing. <br /> <br />MUPTE Guidelines <br />The MUPTE application packet is provided as Attachment A. This includes the adopted local standards. <br />Public benefits are at the core of the program. Applicants must respond to a list of public benefits <br />including sustainability features, responsiveness to adjacent historic resources, quality of building <br />materials, design elements, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible units, home ownership and <br />solicitation of neighborhood association comments. The guidelines include specific rules for protection <br />of historic or potentially historic buildings. <br /> <br />Characteristics of MUPTE Applicants <br />MUPTE applicants have typically been single-site property owners or small development companies. <br />There are two exceptions. The history is unclear about the origin of the development team for Broadway <br />Center at Broadway and Washington, the first approved MUPTE (1978). Broadway Place at Broadway <br />and Charnelton (1996) is a City-assisted project that was constructed on urban renewal property following <br />a request for proposals (RFP). The developer, Lorig and Associates, was based in Seattle but included <br />significant private local investment and management for the project. MUPTE applicants are commonly <br />individuals who own a property for an extended period of time and use the tool to significantly improve it. <br />It appears from an examination of the tax rolls that all of the approved MUPTE projects are still owned by <br />the original applicants. <br /> <br />As an example, the three most recent MUPTE applications came from local interests: <br /> <br />Bob Newland is a life-long Eugene resident. Patterson Place will be his first real estate development. <br />? <br /> <br />Council approved this application on October 8, 2007. <br /> F:\CMO\2007 Council Agendas\M071022\S071022C.doc <br /> <br /> <br />