Laserfiche WebLink
<br />During a joint work session of the EWEB Commissioners and City Council on May 30, 2007, elected <br />officials met to discuss possible approaches to plan for the future of the EWEB riverfront. Both the <br />board and the council acted to recommend an EWEB-managed, collaborative master planning process. <br />The board and the council also directed the EWEB General Manager and the City Manager, <br />respectively, to draft a memorandum of understanding with an outline of the steps leading to the <br />disposition and redevelopment of the EWEB riverfront property, and to bring the outline back for <br />discussion at a subsequent joint meeting between the board and the council. A draft of the MOU was <br />developed by staff from both organizations, and was considered by the EWEB Commissioners on <br />November 6, 2007. At that meeting, the EWEB Commissioners requested two changes in the draft <br />MOU: 1) to clarify that City staff would not bill EWEB for the time spent assisting this process, and 2) <br />to clarify that a mix of uses or activities can take place within one building, a cluster of buildings, or <br />across the entire site. These changes have been incorporated into the draft MOU attached to the AIS. <br /> <br />The draft MOU addresses the process for master planning the EWEB riverfront property and the <br />necessary land use applications required for redevelopment. The MOU does not impose limitations on <br />the City regarding the possible purchase of the property, or on EWEB regarding the possible sale of the <br />property. Both of these critical issues are addressed below. <br /> <br />1. Declaration of Surplus & Decision to Sell <br />EWEB has sole authority to determine whether to sell, the portions of property to sell, and the timing for <br />declaring the property surplus. A declaration of surplus can be made by a majority vote of the board to <br />approve a resolution declaring a parcel surplus and to authorize the General Manager to begin disposal <br />of the property. EWEB must then offer the City the first opportunity to acquire the property for “other <br />municipal purposes.” <br /> <br />The price for the property will be determined by EWEB. The price could be based on an appraisal of <br />the property using assumptions about the future use and value. EWEB has stated that the purpose of <br />selling the property is to generate funds for the relocation of utility operations to the Roosevelt site, and <br />is not likely to declare that any of the property is for sale until after financing for relocation is secured. <br />EWEB Commissioners and staff have also expressed concern that a master plan may not result in land <br />use and development scenarios of adequate property value to cover relocation. EWEB can decide not to <br />sell, establish a different price, or qualify the master plan prior to submitting it for City approval. <br /> <br />2. City Acquisition of EWEB Property <br />After EWEB declares the property available for sale and establishes a price for the property, the City has <br />two main options: to request negotiations or to not request negotiations. If the City wants to acquire the <br />property, the City Manager must request negotiations within 30 days of initial notification from EWEB. <br />The City Manager and the EWEB General Manager could then negotiate an agreement to compensate <br />EWEB for the property. The City would need to undertake a good faith effort towards negotiating a <br />price for the actual purchase of the property. The master planning process could also begin at that time, <br />if it is not already underway. Unless the language in the Downtown Plan and the Land Use Code is <br />revised, the City could not close on the purchase prior to the approval of a master plan, since the lot line <br />adjustments required to legally separate the parcels for sale are land use applications and cannot be <br />approved until the master plan is approved. <br /> <br />If the City chooses to acquire all or a portion of the property, currently available urban renewal revenues <br />would be insufficient. In all likelihood, general obligation bonds, requiring a public vote for approval, <br /> F:\CMO\2007 Council Agendas\M071121\S071121A.doc <br /> <br />