Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />ECC <br />UGENE ITY OUNCIL <br />AIS <br />GENDA TEM UMMARY <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Work Session: Minor Code Amendments <br /> <br /> <br />Meeting Date: July 9, 2008 Agenda Item Number: A <br />Department: Planning and Development Staff Contact: Alissa Hansen <br />www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 541/682-5508 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />ISSUE STATEMENT <br /> <br />On July 14, 2008, the City Council will take action on an ordinance concerning land use code <br />amendments to Eugene Code Chapter 9. This work session is intended to prepare the council for <br />consideration of requested action, and will focus on the options available for the package of <br />amendments. <br /> <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />On June 16, 2008, the City Council held a well-attended public hearing on the minor code amendments. <br />The minor code amendment project consists of proposed amendments on 18 topics, which were <br />primarily raised by community members to address code concerns, with the remaining topics referred by <br />council. <br /> <br />At the public hearing, the majority of the testimony centered around two of the 18 proposed amendment <br />topics: #5 Building Height Transitions in South University Neighborhood Association; and #7 Required <br />Parking for Multi-Family Developments in West University and South University Neighborhood <br />Associations. At the City Council public hearing, as well as at the Planning Commission public hearing, <br />testimony on these two amendments was divided, while testimony on the other topics was generally in <br />support. <br /> <br />To help facilitate action on the package of amendments, two separate and independent ordinances are <br />being prepared for the City Council to consider. The first, Ordinance A, contains amendments on the <br />remaining 16 topics, and mirrors the Planning Commission’s recommendations on these amendments. <br />As noted above, public testimony on these topics was generally supportive. Given that these topics are <br />consistent with the priorities and direction provided by the community during the minor code <br />amendment process, and that any remaining issues on these topics could likely be resolved through <br />minor revision or simple clarifications, it is anticipated that council will have adequate information for <br />deliberation and action <br /> <br />The second, Ordinance B, includes options for addressing amendments #5 and #7. Given the range of <br />testimony on these topics and the potential broader policy implications, it is anticipated that these topics <br />will be the focus of the City Council’s discussions. As such, three alternatives are provided for <br />addressing these amendments. All three alternatives include the same code amendment language for <br />amendment #5, which is the neighborhood’s revised proposal for Building Height Transitions in South <br /> Z:\CMO\2008 Council Agendas\M080709\S080709A.doc <br /> <br />