Laserfiche WebLink
<br />In response to a question from Ms. Ortiz, Ms. Muir confirmed that the Memorandum of Understanding <br />(MOU) had included that the hospital would have a level 3 trauma center. Ms. Ortiz indicated her support for <br />McKenzie-Willamette Hospital’s move to the community, adding that she would prefer the hospital be sited <br />south of the river. She would not support providing the hospital with incentives for a site that was north of the <br />river. <br /> <br />City Attorney Glenn Klein indicated that once the motion was on the table it would become clear whether Ms. <br />Ortiz would need to recuse herself, though he was relatively certain she would be able to participate in the <br />conversation. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor hoped the hospital would be sited south of the river. She did not approve of providing incentives <br />to the hospital for the Coburg Road site. She was also strongly opposed to construction of the hospital north <br />of the railroad tracks. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor asked if the Sacred Heart Hospital area had been considered. Ms. Muir replied that the sites <br />before the council were the three sites upon which McKenzie-Willamette would consider building. Ms. Taylor <br />expressed concern about both hospitals being north of the river. <br /> <br />In response to a follow-up question from Ms. Taylor, Ms. Muir stated that the streamlined timeline for zone <br />and plan changes could apply to any of the three sites. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling asked if the Stryker Field property was listed as surplus property by School District 4J. Ms. Muir <br />responded that it was on the list for future development. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling recalled a recent article in the Register Guard which indicated that the paper had plans for the <br />property McKenzie-Willamette was considering as one of the three potential sites. Ms. Muir replied that those <br />were discussions happening between private parties. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling also understood that the University was “looking at multiple years” before being willing to give up <br />its property. Ms. Muir replied that things could happen regardless of the timeline. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling acknowledged that the hospital was the entity that made the final decision. He said it would be nice <br />to see a hospital located within the city zone, but if the hospital decided not to build south of the river the City <br />should still do what it could to ensure the hospital built within city limits. He noted that he had lived in the city <br />for 30 years and always had to cross a river to get to a hospital. He averred that it was important that all three <br />options remain on the table. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark asked if the PeaceHealth campus site would remain open. Ms. Muir confirmed that it would. Mr. <br />Clark said a hospital north of the river was needed and he was glad to see it. He remarked that north Eugene <br />was still waiting on a police facility. He supported having another hospital south of the river but it was <br />McKenzie-Willamette Hospital’s choice. He wanted to support whatever choice the hospital made. He <br />underscored that the hospital could bring in $3 to $5 million in property tax revenues to Eugene. He declared <br />that the City needed to work with what the hospital needed rather than try to direct the process. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor appreciated that the hospital was the body that was making the choice. He stressed that the council <br />was determining what it would do to provide incentives. He averred that the one thing the hospital did not <br />have was time and it would be looking for certainty. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council March 12, 2008 Page 2 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />