Laserfiche WebLink
ECC <br />UGENE ITY OUNCIL <br />AIS <br />GENDA TEM UMMARY <br /> <br /> <br />Work Session: City Hall Complex Priority Issue <br /> <br /> <br />Meeting Date: July 19, 2006 Agenda Item Number: A <br />Department: Central Services Staff Contact: Mike Penwell <br />www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 682-5547 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />ISSUE STATEMENT <br /> <br />The purpose of the July 19, 2006, work session is to narrow the “Renovate,” “Hybrid,” and “New” <br />design options for use in future studies such as site selection and concept design. <br /> <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br />Decision-making criteria were developed with the council to assist in evaluating the options, <br />illuminating different viewpoints, and promoting consensus when discussing the options. The <br />criteria are listed below. <br /> <br />The second of four community forums was held Thursday, May 25, 2006, from 6–8:30 p.m. at <br />the First United Methodist Church. Nearly 100 people participated. The program included an <br />introductory presentation regarding two renovation options, two hybrid options, and two new <br />options, as well as information relating the options to the three values ranked highest at the first <br />community forum: fiscal responsibility, environmental stewardship, and planning for the future. <br />After the presentation, attendees participated in small group exercises, large group discussions, <br />and indicated their preferences regarding each option. The forum was videotaped and copies <br />have been made available at Eugene’s three libraries. A copy of the Community Forum #2 <br />Summary Report was provided in the June 22, 2006, City Council packet. Refer to Attachment <br />A for a public involvement update. <br /> <br />Criteria for the Renovate, Hybrid, New Decision <br />Sustainable Design <br />? <br /> <br /> - Incorporate green building features <br />Accommodation of Employee Needs <br />? <br /> <br /> - Includes ergonomics, good lighting, security, parking, and structural integrity <br />User-Friendly <br />? <br /> <br /> - Physically, visually, and symbolically receptive and accessible; well lit and secure; <br /> ability to transact business in one location and with one visit; easy and close access to <br /> parking and multiple transportation modes, and flexible space for a variety of uses <br />Plan for the Future <br />? <br /> <br /> - Capacity for future expansion, structural integrity, flexibility, and longevity of design <br />Accommodation of Space Needs and Overall Efficiency <br />? <br /> <br /> - Appropriate allocation of space and flexibility for the public, staff, and council; <br /> efficiencies related to consolidation, and building organization and design <br />Architectural Significance <br />? <br /> <br /> - Includes architectural preservation, architectural value, and aesthetics <br />L:\CMO\2006 Council Agendas\M060719\S060719A.doc <br />