Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 14~ <br /> - - - -- . - --- ----- -- - - --. ._- - - - -- --- -- -~ ---- ~ u ,- ~ , - - ---- <br /> - - '- . -'- ~ ~ ~ -- - -- - - -- <br /> --- --------~-----~_. -'-'----=-= =-=--=-:~-- - ~:::'-cC~:::-:-l=-:'C=-~_CC'--:=-- -C':=:-::-_-..c:::.,=~_~_=~-~=:::c==:C'::c-_,_~_ - ---------~- ,- -- :=-:::.~~~='==_-==_.=:: -:-':::-:::::"=-C::C-C====-:-_'" ~==:::.-=-C'..:_ - - -- <br /> -- <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> Ii ,GENERAL FUND <br /> ~ <br /> I "10...,.1. <br /> d Simmons Kendall Co. 11~8l .Valley Printing Company 4? ..50 <br /> I: ,,~ <br /> f~ Sparky's Garbage 1~20 Henry Whittall' 2.60 :~~ <br /> r State Industrial Accident 1?O~59 William's Bakery 3.35 <br /> Ii <br /> II Stuckey Service Station 6~00 A. L. Williamson 20.55 <br /> i' <br /> d C. P. 'Tillman Company .60 Zellerbach Paper Company 14.52 <br /> II <br /> :1 Union Oil Company ?84 General Petro Corp. of Calif. 259.03 <br /> J <br /> II <br /> I: MUNICIPAL PLAY-GROUND <br /> II <br /> ,I <br /> I <br /> II General Petroleum Corp. 1.65 <br /> I <br /> I, <br /> n <br /> jii GENERAL BOND INTEREST <br /> Ii <br /> ;4 A. E. Hulegaard; Treas. 450.80 A. E~ Hulegaard, Treas. 969.22 <br /> +i: A. E. Hulegaard, Treas. 631.12 A. E. Hulegaard, Treas. 125.20 <br /> ll: <br /> jI <br /> .' IMPROVEMENT BOND INTEREST <br /> I,; <br /> Ii - <br /> r; A. E. Hulegaard, Treas. ?96.88 A. E. Hulegaard, Treas. 656.25 <br /> "I <br /> i: PARKING METER <br /> II <br /> j-I <br /> :J <br /> il Allenbaugh Printing Co. 8.20 <br /> \'1 <br /> r <br /> I' <br /> d IMPROVEMENT BOND SINKING <br /> Ii <br /> ii S. M. Calkins 1.55 A. E. Hulegaard, Treas. 66.08 <br /> i <br /> I; Lane County Abstract 245.00 <br /> I' BICYCLE FUND <br /> ;:~ <br /> 'I <br /> " <br /> I, J. H. McDonald Lumber Co. 5.?2 <br /> II <br /> " <br /> I I': MUNICIPAL AIRPORT <br /> ~ i <br /> il <br /> I, Mountain States Power Co. 16.35 Eugene Water Board 1.35 <br /> " <br /> , <br /> I' <br /> I, Councilman Koppe reporting for the Judiciary Committee stated the <br /> 'I <br /> it committee and Mayor Large 'had met with Mr. Bacon and Mr. Dunnof the Pacific <br /> !I Telephone and Telegraph Co., on Monday evening October 4th. Mr. Koppe <br /> Ii stated that the recent franchise granted the Telephone Co., was d*sbbssed <br /> Ii <br /> I: and that Mr. Bacon had asked that the wording of Section 12 on the recent <br /> I;: <br /> I' franchise be changed some and that the matter of the free phones funnished <br /> I <br /> Ii to Cityshould be eliminated and that the Telephone Company would he willing <br /> !i to accept a ten year franchise with these changes rather than the present <br /> I' 20 year franchise. Mr. Koppe reported that after some discussion a motion <br /> t <br /> ~ ~ was made by Mr. Hawn and seconded by Mr. Barette and carried by the two <br /> Ii <br /> I: members of the committee that a recommendation be made to the Council that <br /> I,: <br /> I the franchise be changed to comply with th~ r~quest of the Telephone Company. <br /> 9 :1 <br /> I: Mr. Koppe stated that he believed the franchise as padded by the Council was <br /> I' fair and just and that he wished to bring in a minority report that the franchise <br /> ,I be not changed but stand as it was passed. A motion was made by Councilman <br /> [i <br /> " Farrington that the monority report of the Judiciary committee be adopted. Council- <br /> Ii man Stewart stated that in as much as the 'vote on the present franchise was seven <br /> 1,1 <br /> fi tp one and that he felt the franchise was passed and faar that he wished to <br /> " <br /> 1'1 second the motion made by Mr. Farrington. Mr. Bacon, representing the Pacific <br /> " Telephone and Telegraph Co., was present, and stated that his Company did not <br /> I <br /> l see fit to accept the franchise as passed: That in iview of the present earnings <br /> I <br /> I high taxes and no increase in rates he hoped the Council could see t~eir way <br /> .. <br /> I <br /> i' clear to make the changes as requested by the Telephone Company. Councilman <br /> I. Hawn stated that he had thought the 2% fee was too stiff to start with and that <br /> j! <br /> r he did not like the idea of free phones: He did not think it was a good pOlicy <br /> I, and that the City should pay for whatever phones they used. Councilman Baker <br /> I"~ asked that if the free phones were .eliminated from the franchise if the ~i~fer- <br /> I ence in cost to the City would be about $500.00 per year and it was explained <br /> I: that it would make a difference of about $950.00 per year to the City. The <br /> I I' question was called for and on voice vote was carried, Councilman Hawn voting No. <br /> J,; Mayor Large stated to Mr. Bacon that the Council has seen fit not to change the <br /> I: franchise and Mr. Bacon said he appreciated the time that the Council had put in <br /> II on the franchise and that he hated to see the matter go into a legal fight and <br /> II <br /> t he supposed the only thing left for him to do was to see if the Company would <br /> It <br /> I; accept the. present franchise. <br /> I; Mr. Koppe asked Attorney Calkins to make a report for the Judiciary <br /> 10 !' Committee regarding the request of Mr. Keating to install apr3:vate talking <br /> Ii- system between his home and store at 13th and Willamette Streets. Mr. Calkins <br /> I; <br /> I <br /> ) <br /> I' <br /> r " <br /> I <br /> I <br /> fj ...4 <br />