|
<br />::I
<br />
<br />,~
<br />179
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />~~-,~,--;...j..
<br />
<br />VIADUCT
<br />
<br />4TH STREET
<br />
<br />To TAL
<br />
<br />COUNTY
<br />
<br />STATE
<br />
<br />TOTAL
<br />
<br />CONTRACT
<br />(TOM lILLEBO)
<br />
<br />8387,221.00
<br />
<br />31,540.00
<br />
<br />42,332.90
<br />
<br />41 B, 76 I .00
<br />
<br />1,030.85
<br />
<br />462,124.7'
<br />
<br />ADO. ITEMS
<br />
<br />5,600.00
<br />
<br />5,600.00
<br />
<br />5,600.00
<br />
<br />TOTAL 392,821.00
<br />
<br />424,361.00
<br />
<br />31,540.00
<br />
<br />42,332.90
<br />
<br />I , 0 30 . 85
<br />
<br />467,724.75
<br />
<br />CONT. &: ENGR. (10%) 39,282.10
<br />
<br />42,436.10
<br />
<br />3,154.00
<br />
<br />4,233.29
<br />
<br />103.09
<br />
<br />46,772.46
<br />
<br />TOTAL 432,103.10
<br />
<br />34,694.00
<br />
<br />466,797.10
<br />
<br />46,566.19
<br />
<br />1,133.94
<br />
<br />5'4,497.23
<br />
<br />R/w
<br />
<br />. 94,000.00
<br />
<br />94,000.00
<br />
<br />TOTAL
<br />
<br />560,797.10
<br />
<br />46,566.19
<br />
<br />1,133.94
<br />
<br />608,497.23
<br />
<br />lESS CREDITS
<br />
<br />BRIDGES
<br />
<br />30,000.00
<br />
<br />R/Q
<br />
<br />50,000.00
<br />
<br />80,000.00
<br />
<br />PAY STATE
<br />.TOTAL - &188,000.00
<br />
<br />480,797. I 0
<br />94,000.00 CITY SHARE
<br />
<br />THE FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR A PROPOSED METROPOLITAN SANITARY DISTRICT WAS ANALYZED
<br />BY MR. RALPH RODERICK OF THE FIRM OF CORNELL, HOWLAND, HAYES AND MERRYFIELD. MR. RODERICK
<br />ANALYZED THE METHODS OF SEWAGE TREATMENT, EXPLAINING THE DIFF~RENCE BETWEEN PRIMARY AND
<br />COMPLETE TREATMENT IN CONNECTION WITH THE LOCATION OF THE PLANTS ADJACENT TO EUGENE AND
<br />SPRINGFIELD, OR THE CHANGING OF THESE PLANTS TO A COMBINED PLANT TwO MILES NORTH OF YHE
<br />NORTH CITY liMITS OF THE CITY OF EUGENE NEAR THE CONFLUENCE OF THE IILLAMETTE AND MCKENZIE
<br />RIVERS WHERE ONLY PRIMARY TREATMENT WOULD BE NEEDED.
<br />
<br />THE ALTERNATE PROPOSALS FOR LOCATION OF THE PLANTS AND THE RELATIVE EXPENSE OF OUT-
<br />FALL LINES, GRAVITY FLOWS AND PUMPING WERE DISCUSSED. PLAN NO. 12 AS SHOWN IN THE
<br />FEASIBILITY STUDY WHICH PROVIDES FOR ONE CENTRAL SEWAGE PLANT LOCATED NEAR THE CONFLUENCE
<br />OF THE WILLAMETTE AND MCKENZIE RIVERS WAS DISCUSSED IN DETAIL AND IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT
<br />THIS lOCATION COULD BE ESTABLISHED AS THE MOST LOGICAL LOCATION TO SERVE THE ENTIRE AREA
<br />IN THE FUTURE AND WOULD BE THE MOST ECONOMICAL IN THE LONG RANGE PROGRAM INASMUCH AS
<br />OPERATIONAL COSTS WOULD BE CONSIDERABLY REDUCED.
<br />
<br />METHODS OF ORGANIZING THE DISTRICT, WHETHER IT SHOULD BE A METROPOLITAN SANITARY
<br />DISTRICT OR WHETHER IT SHOULD BE DONE BY CONTRACTS BETWEEN CITIES AND DISTRICTS WERE
<br />QUITE THOROUGHLY ANALYZED AND ALSO THE METHODS OF FINANCING WITH RELATION TO THE PRESENT
<br />SEWER SERVICE C~ARGES WITHIN THE CITIES AND THE RELATIVE AMOUNT OUTSIDE OF THE CITIES IN
<br />THE. WATER DISTRICTS.
<br />
<br />IT WAS BROUGHT OUT THAT UNDER OREGON STATE [AWS A lATER UTILITY HAS THE RIGHT TO
<br />LEVY AND COLLECT SEWER SERVICE CHARGES WHICH ARE CLASSIFIED AS A UTILITY FOR THE HEALTH
<br />AND SANITATION Or THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY. THE CITY MANAGER WAS INSTRUCTED TO GET ALL
<br />INFORMATION POSSIBLE PERTAINING TO OTHER CITIES AND THEIR FINANCIAL PROGRAM PERTAINING
<br />TO SEWAGE PLANTs AND PARTICULARLY TO THE FINANCING OF OUTFALL LINES AND IN SEWAGE TREAT-
<br />MENT OUTSIDE OF THE CITY liMITS.
<br />
<br />MEETING ADJOURNED AT 10:00 P.M.-
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY CRUMBAKER, SECONDED BY GODLOVE THAT THE REPORT OF THE PUBLIC WORKS
<br />COMMITTEE BE RECEIVED AND PLACED ON FILE. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />4
<br />
<br />A REPORT OF THE PUBLIC 10RKS COMMJTTEE - RE: VARIOUS IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS WAS SUBMITTED
<br />AND READ AS FOLLOWS:
<br />
<br />-A MEETING OF THE PUBLIC 10RKS COMMITTEE WAS HELD ON MAY 4, 1950 AT 4:00 P.M. WITH
<br />THE FOLLOWING PRESENT: CHAIRMAN CRUMBAKER, COUNCILMAN GODLOVE, CITY MANAGER AND CITY
<br />ENGINEER.
<br />
<br />THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS WERE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL.
<br />
<br />I .
<br />
<br />THE PAVING OF 23RD AVENUE EAST FROM COLUMBIA TO Moss AND Moss FROM 23RD
<br />AVENUE TO THE SOUTHERLY LIMITS OF MISSION STREET
<br />
<br />68.00%
<br />
<br />2.
<br />
<br />PAVING OF 24TH AVENUE FROM W'LLAUETTE TO OL'VE STREET
<br />
<br />52.93%
<br />
<br />3.
<br />
<br />SIDEWALK ON 9TH PLACE WEST FROM CHAMBERS TO GRANT STREET.
<br />
<br />68.92%
<br />
<br />I
<br />II
<br />II
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />"'... , l, ,_ - - ._,,~'.','"
<br />
<br />IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE FOLLOWING PROJECTS BE HELD FOR FURTHER SIGNERS OR DEPOSITS
<br />BY PROPERTY OWNERS OF VACANT LOTS, PARTICULARLY ON GARfIELD STREET.
<br />
<br />,..,.,.,,~,~...;;-i.<".!..~<.... i:...i.-~ "~~~:,.
<br />
<br />,'~,_.,::".:.r~~.-
<br />
<br />-;.;;'',.._~.~i..;'',~,~~,"",,-,-~~~,,",~~,
<br />
<br />;-"--''&'~-''-
<br />
<br />>-,,--.''';':...~'''~~~;;d..~;-.",
<br />
<br />~~~>;~.&"Jt~~~;''''':'\,'~~A""-_'_;.;_:_"".,_~,__,,._-:,:2<c>;~;__._~'-i
<br />
<br />~,;..
<br />
<br />,,~,.~..i..: "'-."-- '-:.< ~.
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />,
<br />I
<br />
<br />.#l
<br />
<br /><".'-~,~
<br />
|