Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ~ <br /> 25. ) <br /> --~ <br /> :I -- ._,~_. <br /> IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE PETITION FOR THE PAVING OF CLARK STREET FROM LINCOLN <br /> TO LAWRENCE CONTAINING 58.44~6 BE TEMPORARILY WITHHELD AND BROU GHT UP AGAIf\ WHEN THE I <br /> i I <br /> I' PRO JECTS ARE LINED UP FOR NEXT YEAR'S CONSTRUCTION WO R K . I <br /> \ I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE CITY RELEASE THE SEWER EASEMENT BETWEEN 7TH AN 0 8TH ! <br /> i AVENUE FROM ALMA DEN TO FILMORE FOR MR. BILL STENWICK. (T HE ALLEY HAS BEEN OPE NE 0 UP AND i <br /> II THE EASEMENT IS NO LONGER NECESSARY). I <br /> I <br /> II I <br /> Ii IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE CITY ISSUE BONDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $40,000 TO COMPLETE <br /> !i PAYMENT ON THE AMAZON BRIDGES TO PROVIDE FU N OS FOR THE FOLLOWING: <br /> ii <br /> II OVER-DRAFT ON Q:AK STREET $ 3,532.98 <br /> FINAL ON OAK STREET 911 .04 , <br /> II PEARL STREET 15,989.00 I <br /> I <br /> 24TH, 29TH AND 31ST 16,400.00 I <br /> II I <br /> s 34,832.02" I <br /> II IT WAS MOVE 0 BY Bo 0 T H , S E CON D.E 0 BY HAWN T HA T THE REPORT OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMM I TTEE BE ! <br /> ADOPTED. ROLLCALL VOTE. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> 'I <br /> I Ii RE POR TS OF 90 A R D S AND COMM I SS IONS <br /> Ii BOARD VARIANCES <br /> 4 1\ A REPORT OFT HE OF ApPEALS - HE: TO ZONING ORDI NANCE WAS SUBMITTED AND <br /> II READ AS FOLLOWS: <br /> II "THE BOA RD OF ApPEALS HELD A MEETING AT THE CITY HALL JUL Y 20, 1950 TO CONSiDER THE <br /> II FOLLOWI NG RE-QUESTS FOR VARI AN'CE OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE. <br /> II <br /> I . MR. W ILL I AM HARGRAVES WHO OWNS TWO LOTS AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 20TH AVE~UE AND <br /> II OAK STREETS. THESE PARCELS OF LAND ARE 45-FOOT FRONTAGE AND 106 FEET IN DEPTH, REQUESTS <br /> il PERMISSION TO DIVIDE THE LOTS EAST A NO WEST GIVING FRONTAGE ON (J)AK STREET, THE NEW LOTS <br /> WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS; THE CORNER 60-FEET BY 90-FEET AND THE INTERIOR LOT 46 FEET BY 90 <br /> II FEET WITH AN ADDITIONAL PIE CE OF LAND 45-FEET BY 66-FEET WHICH IS TO THE REAR AND <br /> '~ <br /> II CONNECTED BY A 16-FOOT STRIP FORMING AN ELL S HA P E 0 LOT. SINCE THE AREAS AND SIZES WERE <br /> NOT A REDUCTION FROM THE ORIGINAL PLOTTING THE Bo A R 0 GRANTED THE REQUEST. <br /> II <br /> FAMILY ZONE <br /> il R-I SINGLE <br /> 2. MR. RAY DEAL WHO OWNS A PARCEL OF LAND AT THE NO R T HW EST CORNER OF 12TH AVENUE AND <br /> h <br /> :1 ADAMS STREET, BEING THE SOUTH 1/2 Of" 2 LOTS AND CONTAI NING 6680 S QU ARE FEET. MR. DEAL <br /> REQUESTS A VARIANCE FROM THE AREA REQUIREMENT IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT ANOTHER UNIT ON THE <br /> Ii WEST 1/2 OF THE LOT. SINCE A DIVISION Of" THE LOT WOULD PROVIDE FOR ONLY 3341 S QU A RE <br /> il FEET OF LAND WHI CH IS BELOW THE ORDINANCE REQU IREMENTS AND PROVIDE 2 DWELLINGS ON ONE <br /> \; <br /> I LOT THE BOA RD DE N lED THE REQUEST. R-2 ZONE DUPLEX. <br /> I <br /> i 3. MR. WALTER DENNIS WHO OWNS AND OPERATES THE MOTEL OREGON AT 345 W. 6TH AVENUE HAS <br /> I <br /> , ERECT SIGN PROPERTY 391 \'i. 7TH AVENUE <br /> Ii REQUESTED PERMISSION TO A NEON ON HE OWNS AT IN <br /> I THE C-. ZONE - LIMITED COMMERCIAL. MR. DENNIS DES I RED A SIGN WIT H A DIRECTION ARROW <br /> ADVISING MOTORISTS GOING EAST TO TU RN LEFT AT NEXT BLOCK TO REACH HIS MOTEL ON 6TH AVENUE. <br /> THE PROPERTY WAS PURCHASED ON 7TH AVENUE AS AN OFFICE SUPPLEMENTAL TO HIS MOTEL <br /> PROPERTY AT 6TH AVENUE. <br /> il <br /> Ii <br /> II SINCE THE ORDINANCE PE RM ITS ONLY A WALL SIGN ATTACHED TO THE BUiLDING THE BOAR 0 <br /> :1 <br /> l! CONSIDERED ONLY THIS QUESTION IN CONSIDERING THE REQUEST; THEY AGREE 0 THAT DUE TO THE <br /> Ii T RE E S ON 7TH AVENUE THE WALL SIGN WOULD BE OBSCURED AND GRANTED MR. DENNIS PERMISSION TO <br /> il ERECT A FREE STANDING NEON S I G N WITH AN ARROW POINTING TO THE BUILDING ON HIS PREMISES - <br /> I WO R 0 S - OFFICE - RESERVATIONS - MO TEL t]REGON. THEY WERE OF THE OPINION THAT TREES S HOUL 0 <br /> II NOT BE FELLED TO SATISFY VISIBILITY OF A SIGN ON A COMMERCIAL au I L DIN G. .. <br /> 'I <br /> I, <br /> Ii IT WELLS, SECONDED BY BOOT H THA T THE R E QU EST OF MR. RAY DEAL <br /> WAS MOVED BY BE REFERRED TO <br /> i THE pu BL I C W OR KS COMMI TTEE FOR STUDY AND A RECOMMENDATION. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> I <br /> I IT WAS MOV E D BY Bo OT H, SE COND E'D BY SMITH THAT THE BALANCE OF THE REPORT OF THE BOARD OF <br /> 11 APPEALS BE ADOPTED. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> II THE ELKS L 00 GE PERMITTED CONSTRUCT DENTAL CLINIC <br /> 5 " REQUEST OF THE TO BE TO AND GPERATE A <br /> II FOR THE USE OF UNDER-PRIVILEGED CHILDREN OF LANE COUNTY ON lOT 14 BLOCK 6 OF T E S C HN E R ADDITION <br /> " <br /> I, WAS AGAIN CONSIDERED. THE CITY MANAGER HAS INVESTIGATED THIS SITE AN 0 FIN OS THIS LOCATION IS <br /> :1 <br /> Ii ON THE WEST BOUNDARY OF THE PROPOSED PARK AREA IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOUTH WILLAMETTE PARK <br /> II <br /> I DEVELOPMENT AND THE RE FORE IT IS' RECOMMENDED THAT THIS VARIANCE BE GRANTED AS PREVIOUSLY OUT- <br /> I <br /> II LINED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. <br /> , <br /> Ii IT WAS MOVED BY HAWN, SECONDED BY GODLOVE THAT THE VARIANCE BE GRANTE D. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> I Ii <br /> II <br /> " <br /> Ii <br /> 1i1l"'0~ "'... ,..1..,...." ._,,,~.0 ~~,,- ,;u-...;;"",..,. ;"""",,,~~..n~;;c....;:"~~; z..;'.'. .~""~-~, .k.,~ <e' ,,,. 1:.~~...::;:..,,'...w., ~"V-""~d_'''''..9:,~~......<;;i:t,'i~~:_,..'-;;j..i.,:".~_'~~i""_";Y.;!.:,f2')"""'_~",'-':'::.,...... ,-.~-':::.o,,'-.~~- ._"-"~ <br />