Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />5:7 ""'IIll <br /> <br />./ <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />~ <br />!j,' <br />00 <br /><( <br />10-. <br /> <br /><eX: <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1\ <br /> <br />COUNCIL ~HAMBERS, <br />EUGENE, OREGOIN. I <br />MARCH 24, 1952. <br /> <br />'I <br /> <br />;... <br /> <br />'THE REG0LAR MEETING OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EUGENE, OREGON WAS, HEL~ IN <br />THE CITY HALL ON MARCH 10, 1952 AND ADJOURNED TO MARCH 24, 1952 AT 7:30'P.M. ~THEI MEETING <br />WAS CALLED TO ORDER BY HIS HONOR,,' MAYOR Y:' E. JOHN'SON, WITH THE FOLLOWING COUNCI'U-1EN PRESENT: <br />CRUMBAKER, BOOTH, GODLOVE, SMITH, KOPPE, SIEGE"THALER AND WATSON. COUNOILM~NALLEN WAS <br />ABSENT. <br /> <br />THE MINUTES OF THE LAST REGULAR MEETING HELD MARCH 10, 1952 AND ADJOURNED Td MARCH 24, <br />1952 WERE READ AND APPROVED. <br /> <br />REPORTS OF OFFICERS <br /> <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />I: <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I, <br />11 <br />il <br />I ~ <br />II <br />'I <br />Ii <br />'I <br />" <br /> <br />A REPORT OF THE CITY MANAGER ON VARIOUS SUBJECTS WAS SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDER~TION. IN <br />HIS REPORT THE CITY MANAGER EXPRE'SSE.D'APPRECIATION FOR CONSIDER.ATION'SHOWN DUR'ING HIS RECENT <br />ILLNESS AND IN THE MANNER IN WHICH THE WORK HAD BEEN CARRIED ON DURI~G HIS ABSENCE. <br /> <br />CALLED TO THE ATTENTION o'F ~HE COUNCIL WERE:--- <br />I <br /> <br />THE LEAGUE OF OREGON C I TIES REG I ONAL MEE T I NG FOR LA'NE COUNTY C I TIES TO BEl H(LD AT THE <br />OSBURN HOTEL ON MARCH 31ST "AT 6:u30 P.M~' <br />',I t I <br /> <br />THE NORTHWEST RECREATION CON~ERtNCE TO BE HEL~ AT THE OSBURN HOTEL 'ON APRI'L 2ND THROUGH <br />APRIL 4TH. <br /> <br />THE ADMISSIONS TAX CASE OF THE CITY OF EUGENE WILL BE HEARD BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT <br />ON WEDNESDAY, tylARCH 26, 1952. ,. <br /> <br />THAT THE ASSISTANT TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSlnN INDICATED THAT THE <br />PARKING SURVEY INFORMATlo'N WILL 'BE AVAILABLE IN ABOUT' TWO WEIEKS AND THAT 'OTHER ~1"NFORMATlON <br />WILL BE AVAILABLE IN ABOUT O~E ~ONT~. ./ <br /> <br />I <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />Ii <br />I: <br />II <br />I' <br />II <br />II <br />Ii <br />[I <br />II <br />Ii <br />II <br />Ii <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />II <br /> <br />THAT A MEETING OF THE COUNCIL TO STUDY pRDINANCES UNDER THE CODIFICATION PROJECT IS <br />TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR FRIDAY EVENING) .MARCH 28TH AT THE CITY HALL. <br /> <br />_I <br /> <br />THE REPORT WAS RECEIVED BY THE dOUNCIL. <br />I . , <br /> <br />REPORTs'or'COMMJTTEES <br /> <br />-. <br /> <br />A REPORT OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE - RE: IMPROVEMENTS; ORDINANCE 8316 PROVIDING <br />FOR "SE'WER CONNECTIONS (OR'. PROPERTY LOCATED OUTSIDE CITY LIMITS'" WAS SUBMITTED AN'D READ AS <br />FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />"THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE OF THE COUNCIL MET ON MARCH 18, 1952. PRESENT AT <br />THE MEEtiNG WtRt 'MAYORJOHNSON, COUNCILMEN CRUMBAKER, GODLOVE, KOPPE, SIEGENTHALER; <br />CITY MANAGER; 'ACTING CITY ENGINEER.AND'THE,CITY RECORDER. <br /> <br />SIXTEEIN 'PETITIONS FOR STREE.T AND ALLEY <br />PROJECTS WERE VIEWED BY THE COMMITTEE. THE <br />FOR APPROVAL BY THE COUNCIL. <br />I <br /> <br />IMPROVEMENTS WERE.~RE'V,I EWEDAND THE PROPOSED <br />FOLLOWING LISTED PROJECTS ARE RECOMMENDED <br />I <br /> <br />. I <br /> <br />I .. .., ,~. <br /> <br />% PROPERTY: <br />PETITIONING <br /> <br />I ~ _ <br /> <br />e A. PAVING <br /> B. rpAVING <br /> C. PAVING <br /> D. PA VI NG <br /> E. PAVING <br /> F. PAVING <br /> G. PAVING <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />22NO AVENUE FROM WASHINGTON TO JEFFERSON. <br />VAN BUREN FROM 5TH TO ALLEY BET. 5TH & 6TH AVE,. <br />E~ST 26TH AVtNUE FROM W1LLAMETTE TO PEARL. <br />ALLEY FROM PATTERSON TO HI'LYARD'- 12TH & 13TH. <br />ARTHUR STREET FROM 18TH TO SOUTH CITY LIMITS (27') <br />24TH FROM WAS~INGTON TO JEFFERSON STREET <br />MONROE FROM 18T~. ~9_)~j~:~y~~~t. <br /> <br />75% <br />y 67. I 8% " <br />'75% (APPROX.) <br />"69.96% <br />54.91% <br />100% <br />55.95% <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATIO'N WI TH RE'SPECT TO TH'E FOLLOWI NG PROP,OSED PROJECTS' IS A'S FOL:LOWS: <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />PAVING WALNUT FROM FRANKLIN BLVD. TO FAIRMOUNT BLVD. 56.61% <br />It IS REdoMM~NOEb THAT THIS PROJECT BE APPROVED SUBJECT <br />TO A DETERMINATION OF WHETHER WALNUT FROM FRANKLIN BLVD. TO <br />15TH SHOULD BE A 36-FOOT STREET OR A 42-FOOT STREET IN WIDTH. <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />WIDENING WILLAMETTE STREET FROM 13TH TO 17TH AVENUE. 55.94% <br />IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THIS PRbJtCT BE APPR6vED FOR <br />StREEt WIDENING TO 46-~E~T'~I~H,ABUTTING PROPERTY TO <br />PAY FULL COST OF WIDENING AND THAT THE COUNCIL CONSIDER <br />EXTENSION OF THE PROJECT TO 19TH AVENUE. <br /> <br />~ <br />