Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ri'60 <br /> e <br /> -- - - - <br /> AFTER REVIEWING if HE PRESENT LE,lSE, IT W,lS BROUGHT OUT TH,lT THE UNIVERSITY H,lD THE I <br /> FIRST REFUS,lL TO LE,lSE SAID PREMISES FOR ,IN ,l,DDI TI ON,lL FIVE YEAR PERIOD AFTER JUNE 30, <br /> 1956 ,lND IT W,lS (ONSIDERED THE $2,500 WAS PURELY A TOKEN RENT.lL AS THE LEASE AGREEMENT I <br /> ALSO STI PULATED TH,lT THE UNIVERSITY WAS TO KEEP THE PROPERTIES IN GOOD REP,lIR, ORDER <br /> AND CONDI TION. IT W,lS RECOMMENDED TH,lT NO CH,lNGES BE MADE IN THE EXISTING LE,lSE BETWEEN I <br /> THE CITY AND THE UNIVERSITY R~L,lTIVE:TO SKINNER'S BUTTE LEASE. <br /> I <br /> THE CITY MAN,lGER LETTER FROM MR. LI NDScTROM, ASKING FOR OPPORTUNITY I <br /> RE,lD A SECOND AN Ii <br /> TO MEET WITH THE COMM I TTEE. IT WAS AGREED BY THE COUNCIL TO REFER T,H IS TO THE FINANCE Ii <br /> COMMI TTEE AND MEET WITH THE UNIVERSITY OFFICIALS. IT WAS ALSO SUGGESTED THAT THE FINANCE <br /> COMMI TTEE MEET WITH THE PARKS DEPARTMENT TO AS~ERTAIN WHAT PLANS MIGHT BE DEVELOPING FOR I: <br /> I, <br /> POSSIBLE FUTURE USE OF THE SKINNER'S BUTTE HOUSING PROJECT. I: <br /> I[ <br /> 4. THE COMMITTEE REVIEWED THE REQUEST OF MR. ESPER RICHEY FOR A VARIANCE TO PERMIT II <br /> CONSTRUCTION' OF A ONE STORY DUPLEX AT 1943 ORCHARD STREET. THE LOT IS 86.6 FEET ON <br /> ORCHARD STREET AND' 75 FEET DEEP, CONSTI TUTI NG A'TOTAL AREA OF ABOUT 6500 SQUARE FEET. I' <br /> MR. RICHEY DESIRES TO 'BU rLD A 'TWO BEDROOM DUPLEX AND' A ONE BEDROOM DUPLEX FOR' HIS FAMILY, ,! <br /> I' <br /> CONSTITUTING APPROXIMATELY 2,000' SQUARE FEET WITH A DOUBLE GARAGE AT SIDEWALK GR ,A,[)E . IT I; e <br /> WAS RECOMMENDED THIS VARIANCE BE GRANTED PROVIDED IT DID NOT REDUCE THE ADJA,CENT PROP- I' <br /> I' <br /> ERTI~S BELOW MI NIMUM AREA REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE ZONI NG, CODES. IT WAS ALSO STI PULATED Ii <br /> THAT THE DUPLEX BE CONFINED TO A ONE STORY STRUCTURE. THE CITY MANAGER REPORTED THAT Ii <br /> I' <br /> THE PROPERTIES ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS LOT WERE 86.6 FEET BY 75 FEET CONSTITUTING AN Ii <br /> AREA II <br /> OF ABOUT 6500 SQUARE FEET. <br /> - II r- <br /> 5. THE COMMI TTEE INSPECTED THE OPENING OF THE ALLEY BETWEEN GARFIELD S~REET AND HAYES I I <br /> STREET FROM K8TH TO 22ND AVENUE AS RE'QUESTED IN THE PETITION SIGNED BY 49.73% OF THE <br /> PROPER TY OW N E R S . I TWAS NOTED THAT THERE WERE OVER 50% OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS WHO HAD Ii <br /> NOT SIGNIFIED THEIRWILLfNGNESS FOR THIS ALLEY 'TO BE OPE'NED, WHICH WOULD NECESSITATE II <br /> THE DEEDING OF PROPERTY FROM EACH ,S I DE A'L LEY FOR' ALL E Y ~P U R P 0 S E S . I <br /> SEVEN FEET OF OF THE ': <br /> INASMUCH AS THE CITY IS NOT IN A POSITION TO PURCHASE RIGHT OF WAY FOR THIS PURPOSE, IT Ii <br /> WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE REQUEST FOR ,OPENING OF THIS ALLEY BE TABLED UNTI L ALL OF THE I' <br /> II <br /> RIGHT OF WAY COULD BE FURNISHED BY ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS. II <br /> 6. THE COMMITTEE REVIEWED THE PETITION FOR PAVING THE ALLEY BETWEEN HILYARD AND ALDER Ii <br /> STREET F~OM FRANKLIN BOULEVARD SOUTH TO THE MILL RACE AND INASMUCH AS THE PETITION i! <br /> CONTAINS 76.45% OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS, RECOMMENDED THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT BE APPROVED. i <br /> I <br /> MR. SILSBEE 'WHO OWNS PROPERTY ABUTTING THIS ALLEY ON THE MILL RACE APPEARED A,ND OBJECTED II <br /> TO PAVING BEYOND THE TURN OF THE A,LLEY. THE PROJECT WAS APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL FROM ji <br /> FRANKLIN BOULEVARD TO THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE EAST-WEST ALLEY. Ii . <br /> 7. THE CITY MANAGER REVIEWED THE NECESSITY, OF ~BTAINING FOUR ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS II <br /> FOR THE SEWAGE OUTFALL LINE'FROM THE SEWAGE, TREATMENT PLANT TO THE WILLAMETTE RIVER AND Ii <br /> THE RELATED COSTS INVOLVED. IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE COUNCI,L AUTHORI ZE THE CI TY II <br /> MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE THESE EASEMENTS UPON COMPARABLE COSTS PAID FOR OTHER EASEMENTS I, <br /> FOR THE OUTFALL LI NE BETWEEN THE CITY OF EUGENE AND THE SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT, NOT TO I' <br /> :1 <br /> EXCEED $4,000 FOR THE ENTIRE FOUR EASEMENTS. Ii <br /> ,I <br /> 8. THE COMMI TTEE REQUEST OF MR. AND MRS. EARL E. WARE ;1 <br /> REVIEWED THE A,S SUBMITTED BY I <br /> HALE G. 'THOMPSON, ATTORNEY FOR ,I <br /> THE REZONING OF THE WEST 75 FEET' OF THE NORTH~EST CORNER 'I - I <br /> I <br /> LOT AT 19TH AND'-JEFFERSON STREET, CONSTITUTING 100 FEET ON JEFFERSON AND 150 FE,ET ON II <br /> 19TH AVENUE WEST. PLANS OF'MR. A,ND MRS.' 'WA,RE AR [,' TORE PLAC E THE PRESENT GROCER,Y ,STORE I ~ <br /> ON THE FRONT 75 FEET OF THEIR LOT WI TH A 60 BY 60 GROCERY S:TORE ON THE REAR 75 FEET OF ;: <br /> THE LOT AND TO UTILIZE THE FRONT 75 FEET FOR PARKI NG AREA. ' To DO THI S THEY ARE REQUEST I NG Ii <br /> THE REZONING OF THE REAR OR WEST 75 FEET FROM THE PRESENT RESI DENTI AL ZONI NG TO C-2, Ii <br /> I NEI~HBORHOOD COMMERCIAL. I TWAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION COMPLETE THEIR II <br /> -, STUDY' ON nil S ENTI'RE A, REA R E L AT I V E TO FUTUR E NEEDS FOR 'BUSINESS ZONING PRIOR TO ANY II <br /> i: <br /> DEFINITE ACTION RELATIVE TO THIS REQUEST. Ii <br /> 'I e <br /> COMMITTEE AGAINST LANE COUNTY I: <br /> 9. THE REVIEWED THE PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST COSTS TAX II <br /> DEE D' TO -L 0 T 4, BLOCK 2, TESHNER'S ADDITION WHICH IS HELD BY MR. CLAY BARNES. THE II <br /> PRINCI PAL AND I NTEREST, AMOUNT TO $143.62 AS OF JULY 14, 1952, OF WHICH $57.46 IS I: <br /> PRIN'cIPAL. THE COMMI,TTEE COULD ['I ND NO WAY IN WHICH THE COUNCIL COULD LEGALLY WAIVE (! <br /> I <br /> THE INTEREST. IT WAS TH E RE F OR'E RECOMMENDED THAT THE ENTIRE A,MOUNT OF $'1 4~3. 62 BE PAID I, <br /> Ii <br /> TO CLEAR THIS TAX DEED. " Ii <br /> IN THE MATTER OF RENTAL OF SPACE TO THE COMMUNITY CHEST, IT WAS MOVED BY CRUMBAKER, !: <br /> " <br /> SECONDED BY' ALL E N THAT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMITTEE BE A,DOPTED. ROLLCALL VOTE . \! <br /> MOTION CARRIED. ii <br /> I T WAS MOVED BY CRUMBAKER, SECOND~D BY ALLEN THAT THE BALANCE OF THE REPORT OF THE PUBLIC II <br /> ,! <br /> WORKS A'ND FI NANCE COMMITTEES BE' ADOPTED. MOTION CA,RRIED. I' <br /> 'I <br /> II <br /> " <br /> " <br /> .PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS II I <br /> I <br />4 A PETITION TO MODIFY ZONING ORDINANCE TO PRovrDE FOR OFF-STREET PARKING WAS SUB MITT ED I: <br /> BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. ii <br /> II <br /> I TWAS MOVED'BY CRUMBAKER, SECONDED BY ALLEN THAT THE PETITION BE REFERRED TO THE CITY I ~ <br /> Ii <br /> .tn-TORNEY FOR TH E NECE.SS'ARY RESOLUTION, -AND TO THE PLANNING COMMI~SION FOR CONSIDERATION AT <br /> THEIR AUGUST 5TH MEETING. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> II <br /> Ii <br /> i e <br /> i <br /> I <br />~ I II <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I; <br />