|
<br /> F 1 ""~
<br /> ~) :,
<br /> e
<br /> il -\
<br /> I I! 3. REQUEST FOR'A SECOND CURB CUT FOR THE RESIDENCE OF DALE f. MILLER, 400 EAST 30TH
<br /> II AVENU~!~ THE REQUEST.FbR ~ SECOND CURB CUT FOR THE RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 400 EAST 30TH
<br /> I
<br /> ji. ~VEN~~,WAS MADE BY,MR~iKENNETH H. WOLLENWEBER, THE DESIGNER. IT WAS EXPLAINED ~YTHE
<br /> CI TY ENGI,NEER THAT THE :EXI STI NGCUT I S ACTUALLY A CUT ON THE CURB 'OF 17,FEET ANI,) THE
<br /> II REQUEST ,I..S FOR ANOTHER d 7 FOOT CUT OF THE CURB. IT WAS INDICATED THAT THE U-SH4PED
<br /> Ii I
<br /> DRIVEWAY, WHICH NECESSIT~TES THE TWO CUTS, WAS DESIGNED TO FACILITATE TWO CARS l.N THE I
<br /> d CAR PORT AND FOR OFF~STREET PARKING.
<br /> Ii I
<br /> !I AFTER SOME DI~CUSSION OF THIS SUBJECT, IT WAS THE OPINION OF. THE COMMITT-EE,THAT
<br /> I:
<br /> THE REQUEST SHOULD BE APPROVED AND THEREFORE IT fs RECOMMENDED THAT THE COUNCIL GIVE IT
<br /> it APPROVAL.
<br /> ,I
<br /> ,; TRAFFIC StGNAL PROGRAM FOR 1955-56- THE FOLLOWING REPORT WAS SUBMITTED BY THE CITY
<br /> ii 4.
<br /> " MANAGER AND THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER.
<br /> "
<br /> i:
<br /> "
<br /> I,
<br /> II "IN ORDER THAT A SIGNAL PROGRAM CAN BE GOTTEN UNDERWAY THIS OFFICE IS SUB-
<br /> \\ MITTING THE FOLLOWING ~REAKDOWN OF CQST ON VARIOUS PROJECTS, THREE OF WHICH COULD BE
<br /> tit ,; PERFORMED WITH THE MONEY ALLOTTED. THE ONLY MONEY AVAILABLE I N THE 1955-56 BUDGET
<br /> II FOR NEW SIGNAL I NSTALLATI ON IS THAT INTENDED FOR SIGNALS ON GARFIELD, SHOULD IT HAVE
<br /> ,I BEEN PUT THROUGH FROM 7TH TO II TH AVENUES. IF DESIRED, THIS MONEY COULD BE DIVERTEQ
<br /> II
<br /> ,I TO THREE OF THESE PROJECTS:
<br /> Ii
<br /> I ~ I . ' CONVERSION OF EXISTING PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS AT BROADWAY & WILLAMETTE TO 'THE NEW
<br /> I'
<br /> I (SAMPLE IN OPERATION AT CORNER) ..'
<br /> ,SQUARE TYPE I
<br /> I
<br /> I I
<br /> I COST OF 16 UNITS {BASED ON PRICE FOR 32 OR MORE) $ 544.00
<br /> \ 1/1, \
<br /> I \_~.t I,
<br /> ,
<br /> r .1,,1",
<br /> 2. INSTALL A SCRAMBLE SYSTEM ON CORNER OF BROADWAY & OLIVE /;1:':._,
<br /> Ii
<br /> II 1 ~QUARE, REFLECTOR & LENS UNIT ( I 6 ) $ 544.06
<br /> l: SIG~AL'BoDYSECTION, ETC. ..'160.00
<br /> ' .
<br /> Ii LABOR AND WIRE ~i 52.00
<br /> 'I POLE EXTENSIONS ' 30.00,
<br /> L
<br /> I' '!
<br /> I' $ 886.00
<br /> I: "
<br /> 3. INSTALL SIGNAL~ AT 18TH & HILYARD
<br /> .! Ii
<br /> 'I $ 1.58.5.0'
<br /> II POLES INSTALLED
<br /> "
<br /> SIGNAL HEADS 19,8'.,00
<br /> CONir.ROLLER 390.00
<br /> LABOR 150.00
<br /> MATER I AL I ~6.00'
<br /> \, '" I. , .-.,_' " . \. . .;.," , $1 ,022.50
<br /> ,-,
<br /> , . 1
<br /> 4. INSTALL SIGNALS AT 18TH & UNIVERSITY $1,022.50 .,
<br /> I IT IS FELT ;THAT SIGNALS MIGHT BE DESIRABLE AT THIS CORNER TO F'ACLLlTATE THE HANDLING
<br /> OF' CROWDS DURING FUNCTIONS AT MACARTHUR COURT. IT COULD BE LEFT ON FLASHING OR
<br /> . , OPERAT'E ON ,A, SHORT C;YCLE THE REST OF ,THE TI ME. DARK RAINY .NIGHTS WI1L BE PARTICULARLY
<br /> ,HAZARDOUS ONCE 18TH IS QPENED TO AGATE. THIS CORNER DOES NOT OTHERWISE MEET WARRANTS
<br /> FOR, SIGNALS.
<br /> IF FURTHER SAVINGS fN LABOR AND MATERIAL CAN BE REALIZED OR IF THE SIGNALS CAN
<br /> BE REMOVE'D FR9M 19TH & HILYARD, IT MAY BE POSSIBLE TQ DO ALL FOUR PROJECTS.
<br /> e ~
<br /> " ' NEON WALK-WAITS COST $91.30 WITH TUBIN~ EXTRA. " '
<br /> COST Of 'INTER~E~TION USING FOUR UNITS $' 555,..20'"
<br /> "J ~.
<br /> THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE SPENT SOME TIME DISCUSSIN~ T~E PROPOSED PROGRAM. 'ANI) THE
<br /> EXTENT AND OPERATION OF THE SIGNAL SYSTEM AS COMPLETED THROUGH THE YEAR 1954-55. IT I S THE
<br /> RE~~MMENDATION OF THE COMMITTEE THAT THE COUNCIL GIVE APPROVAL OF THIS PROGRAM AS OU7LINED
<br /> .' '\ ~, - - . . . . . "Ie
<br /> A;NO THAT THE WORK,. PROCEED AND, CONTI:NUE I NSOF AR AS IT ~AN BE rl~ANCED WITH THE MONEY^
<br /> ,
<br /> 11 6UDGETEp fOR THE PURPOSE IN THE 1955-56 BUDGET. , ,.
<br /> !I
<br /> It 5. MI6CELLANEOUS REQUESTS FOR PARKING RESTRICTIONS - A NUMBER 9F REQUESTS FOR PAR~ING
<br /> ': I
<br /> I' RESTRICTIONS WERE RECEIVED AND STUDIED BY THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER. THESE WERE INVESTIGATED
<br /> I:
<br /> I; ,BY THETRAFfICENG~NEER AND REPORrE~ TO THE COMMJTTEE WITH CERTAIN RECOMMENDATIONS.
<br /> :1
<br /> I' REQUEST FROM THE ELKS CLUB AT 7TH AVENUE AND OLIVESTREET'- THE REQUES~'HERE
<br /> :1 ' J:o. IS
<br /> " FOR ELI MI N,ATI O,N OF ONE PARKI NG SPACE .JUST EAST A,ND NEXT TO THE EXI T OF..-TH,E' ELKS
<br /> ! ~
<br /> I ii PARKING LOT ON 7TH AVENUE. IT IS POINTED OUT IN THE REQUEST THAT IT IS VERY
<br /> Ii
<br /> II DIFFICULT TO NEGOTIATE.A RIGHT HAND TURN FROM THIS EXIT TO PROCEED E.~ST WIT,H A
<br /> Ii , CAR PARKED IN.THIS SPACE. r
<br /> ,.
<br /> "
<br /> II IT' IS THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE TRAFfiC ENGINEER AND ALSO THE RECOMMENDATION OF
<br /> II
<br /> I, THE COMMITTEE THAT THE METER SPACE JUST EAST OF JHE DRIVEWAY BE ELIMINATED.
<br /> Ii
<br /> ,1
<br /> "
<br /> II
<br /> :1
<br /> :1 I
<br /> e 'I
<br /> I,
<br /> I'
<br /> Ii
<br /> 1
<br /> i ~
<br /> ,
<br />
|