|
<br />e
<br />
<br />; I
<br />l'
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />6~
<br />
<br />I '.
<br />
<br />REQUEST rOR VARIAN~E BY MEDO-LAND CREAMERY ~O ALLOW CONSTRUCTION 0' TANKS ON THE
<br />'OR STORAGE 0' LIQUID WAX - THE COMMITTEE VIEWED THIS AREA AND THEY DO NOT BELIEVE
<br />THE ADDITION 0' TANKS TO THE ROO' AREA WOULD BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE AREA AND THERE~
<br />RECOMMENDED THAT THE VARIANCE, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BE GRANTED.
<br />
<br />ROO'
<br />THAT
<br />'ORE
<br />
<br />2. REQUEST BY RUBY M. STEWART 'OR VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A THREE 'AMILY DWELLING IN AN
<br />R-I ZONE - THE COMMITTEE VIEWED THE AREA AND GENERALLY AGREED THAT THE INTENDED USAGE
<br />0' THE PROPERTY ,IN AN R-I ZONE WOULD NOT INCLUDE A THREE ,AMILYDWELLING. THERE'ORE;
<br />THEY RECOMMENDED THAT THE REQUEST F'ORVARIANCEBE DENIED.
<br />
<br />3. REQUEST 'OR SEGREGATION 0' ASSESSMENT A~ 1236 WEST 13TH AVENUE - THE COMMITTEE.
<br />VIEWED THIS AREA AND WERE I-N COMPLETE AGREEMENT THAT THE PROPERTY SHOULD NOT BE
<br />SE~REGATED, AND RECOMMENDED THAT THE REQUEST 'OR SEGREGATION BE DENIED AND THAT THE"
<br />CITY MANAGER BE INSTRUCTED TO WRITE THE PROPERTY OWNER A LETTER INDICATING THAT ANY
<br />PERMITS rOR ANY CONSTRUCTION ON EITHER PIECE 0' THIS PROPERTY WOULD BE DENIED, SINCE
<br />NEIT~ER PROPE~TY CONTAINS ENOUGH'AREA TO C~N~TITUTE A LOT AS REQUIRED BY CITY REGULATIONS.
<br />
<br />4. REQUEST 'OR ALLEY VACATION BETWEEN 36TH AND 37TH AVENUES 'ROM WILLAMETTE STREET TO
<br />THE WEST END 0' THE HEPNER TRACT -THE COMMITTEE VIEWED THE AREA BETWEEN 36TH AND 37TH
<br />AVENUES WEST 'ROM WILLAMETTE STREE~ TO THE WEST END OF' THE HEPNER TRACT AND S~ATEDTHAT
<br />THEY DO NOT BELIEVE THE CITY SHOULD VACATE THIS PROPERTY BECAUSE 0' THE POSSIBLE F'UTURE
<br />USE OF' THE AREA 'OR UTILITY, PURPOSES, STORM-SEWER PURPOSES, AND THAT IT WAS IN,THE '
<br />CITY'S INTEREST TO RETAIN SUCH PLATTED ALLEYS.
<br />
<br />THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE REQUESTF'OR VACATION OF' THE ALLEY BETWEEN 36TH
<br />AND 37TH AVENUES 'ROM WILLAMETTE STREET TO THE WEST END OF' THE HEPNER TRACT BE DENIED.
<br />
<br />5. REQUEST BY HENNEN AND VOS F'OR ALLEY VACATION - THE COMMITTEE DISCUSSED THE PROPOSED
<br />ALLEY VACATI ON BETWEEN BLAI R BOULEVARD AND MONROE STREET BETWEEN 7TH AND 8TH AVENUES AND
<br />RECOMMENDED THAT THE CITY MANAGER BE INSTRUCTED TO CONTACT THE EUGENE WATER AND ELECTRIC
<br />BOARD AND THE PACIF'IC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY TO DETERMINE WHAT EF'F'ECT THE VACA-
<br />TION 0' THf,S ALLEY WOULD HAVE UPON THE PUBLIC UTILITIES CURRENTLY LOCATED IN THI,S ALLEY.
<br />
<br />6. REZONING OF' A PORTION 0' THE C-3 CENTRAL ,BUSINESS AREA TO,C-3P COMMERCIAL DISTRICT,
<br />INITIATED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION'- THE COMMITTEE DISCUSSED THE ,PROBLEM O~ CHANGING
<br />THE REQUIREMENTS 'OR LAND USAGE IN THE C_3 CENTRAL BUSINESS AREA AND INDICATED THEY DO
<br />NOT BELIEVE ,I~ IS PRACTICAL TO CHANGE THE"CHARACTER OF' THE,C-3.DISTRICT, NOR'TO REQUIRE
<br />PARK~NG 'ACILITIES,IN THE CENTRAL CORE AREA, ESPECIALLY WHERE PROPERTY HOLDERS HAD, ,
<br />BOUGHT AND/OR HELD PROPERTY IN THE BELIE',THAT THE PROPERTY COULD BE USED 'OR PURPOSES
<br />ALLOWED IN THEC-3 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRIC1:'ll"~
<br />
<br />THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE COMMON COUNCIL 'DENY THAT PART Or, THE PLANNING
<br />COMMISSION'S REPORT, DATED JANUARY 3, 1956, IN WHICH THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED
<br />THAT THE,.CENTRALAREA OF C~3 CENTRAL BUS.NESS DISTRICT BE REZONED'TO C-3P COMMERCIAL
<br />DISTRICT. .. , 'I , ',' ::,:
<br />
<br />. .' - . ,', oi: 1
<br />
<br />; ,
<br />
<br />, THEY ALSOREGOMMENDED THAT THE PLANNINGCOMM~SSION,RESTUDY THtSMATTER S1NCE THE
<br />COMMITTEE FEELS THAT I' IT WERE POSSIBLE, OUTLYING AREAS WHICH ARE ZONED G-3 CEN~RAl'
<br />BUSINESS MIGHT PROPERTY BE REZONED C-3P COMMERCIAL DISTRICT."
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. KOPPE, SECONDED BY MR. GODLOVE, THAT THE REPORT 0' THE PUBLIC WORKS
<br />COMMI TTEE BE ADOPTED. MaTI ON CARRI ED. 1 ' '
<br />
<br />3
<br />
<br />A REPORT OF THEiPuBLIC SAF'ETY COMMITTEE MEETING HELD,JANUARY 13; 1'956 ~ RE: ApPLICATION
<br />'OR PACKAGE STORE LICENSE, CLASS "B", OTIS V~ GILMORE; REQUEST,rOR'REVIEW OF TAXI-DRIVER'S
<br />LICENSE; REQUEST BY WILLIAM A. KERNUTT 'OR THIRTY MINUTE PARKING ZONE; REMOVAL 0' PARKING
<br />METERS ON THE SOUTH SIDE or 6TH AVENUE AND ON THE EAST SIDE 0' OLIVE STREET; COMMUNICATION
<br />FROM WILLIAMcA~D ,DOROTHY EVENDEN; TRAFF'IC CONTROL ON 'ALLEY 'BETWEEN 7TH 'AND 8TH AVENUES rROM
<br />POLK TO TAYLOR STREETS; AND REMOVAL 0' PARKING ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF' 18TH AVENUE AND,OLIVE
<br />STREET WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS:
<br />
<br />. ,'. ." J
<br />
<br />- ,,,PRESENT: ,COUNC I LMEN ,GODLOVE AND HARTMAN; CITY. MANAGER; CH I EF 'OF' POL: lOr; :TRAF'F'I C
<br />SIGNAL TECHNICIAN; CITY RECORDER; AND DAN WYANT OF THE EUGENE REGISTER~GUARD..,
<br />
<br />I. ApPLICATION FOR PACKAGE STORE LICENSEf CLASS' "B", OTIS V. AND RUBYM.GILMORE, DBA
<br />GILMORE'S GROCERY, 2400 WILLANETTE STREET RENEWAL AND GREATER PRIVILEGE) - AFTER
<br />DISCUSSION, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE GREATER PRIVILEGE BE APPROVED AND STATED
<br />THAT THEY DID ,THIS BECAUSE I.T ,WAS ,A LAWFUL BUSINESS ENTER~RISE ANDTHAT_tT ~AS,NO~,DONE
<br />BECAUSE :'THE 'COMMI TTEE 'EL TIT WAS MORALLY JUSTlF'lED. 'I'
<br />
<br />- I'l . ~.
<br />
<br />-. 't . 1....,
<br />
<br />~' .= 1 )
<br />
<br />2. REQUEST 'OR REVIEW 0' TAXI-DRIVER'S LICENSE APPLICATION BY WILLIAM J. LIGHT - THE
<br />tZOMMITTEEDISCUSSED-THE APPLICATION F'OR A TAXI'-DRIVER'S'L:I,CENSE WITH THE'CHIEF 0' POLICE.
<br />THE.CHI EF 'O,,,POLI CE ,PRE'SENTED -,1>HE 'RECORD OF, WI LL:IAM J. LI'GHTAND I NDI'CATED THEY HAD NO
<br />D IF,F'I CUL:TY OR RECORD 'OR 'H 1M'S I NeE "1:952. ,
<br />
<br />" I
<br />
<br />THE COMMI TTEE 'F,EL TSI NeE THERE WAS NO RECENT -,RECORD, THAT THE MAN SHOULD BE GIVEN
<br />ANOTHER CHANCE AND RECOMMENDED THAT THE TAXI-DRIVER'SLICENSE ,APPLIED'OR BE ~PPROVED FOR
<br />THE REMAINDER OF' THE FISCAL YEAR 1955-56 AND THAT THE CITY MANAGER BE INSTRUCTED TO WRITE
<br />A LETTER TO THE MUNICIPAL JUDGE INDICATING THE COUNCIL APPROVED THE LICENSE SUBJECT TO THE
<br />LICENSEE NOT BECOMING INVOLVED IN ANY MOVING VIOLATIONS OR BEING PICKED UP 'OR INTOXICATION,
<br />
<br />AND THAT IN THE EVENT OF THESE THAT ~IS LICENSE BE PERMANENTLY REVOKED.
<br />
<br />~
<br />
|