Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r 80 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />'/27/58 <br /> <br />_--::-__-. ~ ~_~ _4-;:-:__-:::;:: - ::-:_:-:--_ ~ ~_~;:__ ___---::.--::-:-~~ _ ~~----::---_____:__=___~:- _~~~_~--:__::_:-_:_:_~~_: __-:":":-;----- - -::- ~~ ----::-:-_~::---;:=--__::_;;:-_:__~ <br /> <br />------~~- <br />, - . <br /> <br />--~ ._~ ---------- --- <br />_. -- -- - - --- ------ .. <br /> <br />'-1'" <br /> <br />-:: . <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />11 <br />! <br />.1 <br />1 <br />II <br />'I <br />i <br />i <br />, <br />I <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br /> <br />"PRESENT: MAYDR MCGINTY; CDUNCILMEN SHEARER, HARTMAN, SHISLER, EDMUNDS, LAURIS, BRIGGS <br />AND MDLHOLM; CITY MANAGER; CITY RECORDER; CITY ATTDRNEY; CHIEF DF PDLICE; <br />DIRECTDR DF PUBLIC WDRKS; ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT; MESSRS. NORMAN SCHNEIDER, <br />MAURIE JACDBS, TDMMIE THDMAS AND JAMES REYNDLDS; DAN WYANT, EUGENE REGISTER- <br />GUARD; WENDY RAY, KUGN; JACK CRAIG, KERG; AND A NUMBER OF, PEDPLE APPEARED <br />TO. BE HEARD D.NTHE QUEST I DN DF REZON I.NG .THE EAST S I DE DF PDLK STREET FRDM <br />. RAILRDAD BDULEVARD ~O CROSS STREET. <br /> <br />II <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />COMMITTEE Of THE WHOLE <br />I. REZONING LOTS 21 THROUGH 25, MATHEWS PARK, BEING EAST S.IDE OF POLK STREET. FROM. RAIL- <br />ROAD BOULEVARD TO NORTH LINE OF CROSS STREET EXTENDED, FROM R-2 TO M-2 -- T~E COM- <br />MITTEE DISCUSSED AMDNG THEMSELVES AND WITH RESIDENTS OF THE AREA ABUTTING ON PDLK <br />STREET BETWEEN RA.ILROAD BOULEVARD AND CROSS STREET THE REQUEST,BEFORE THE COUNCIL <br />FOR THE REZONING OF THE EAST SIDE OF POLK STREET FROM R-2 Two fAMILY RESIDENTIAL <br />TO M-2 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. IT WAS INDICATED THAT AT THE HEARING HELD BY THE PLAN- <br />NING COMMI.SSIDN NO ONE APPEARED IN DPPDSITION TO. THE PRDPOSED REZDNING; HOWEVER, <br />AT THE SUBSEQUENT. HEARING. HELD BY THE COUNCIL ON JANUARY 13, 1958, A NUMBER. OF PEOPLE <br />APPEARED PROTESTING THE PROPOSED REIONING. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I: <br /> <br />II <br />II <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />PROPDNENTS DF THE REZDNING LIVING IN. THE AREA INDICATED THAT THE AREA JS NOW IN <br />FACT BECDMING INDVSTR.lALlZED AND THAT PROPERTY VALUES F.OR RESIDENTIAL. PURP.DSES ARE <br />RAPIDLY DETERIORATING. IT WAS ALSO. INDICATED THAT THE AREA HA~ BEEN L66KED UPON <br />AS A POSSIBLE INDUSTRIAL AREA FOR THE CITY FDR SDME TIME. OTHERS IN OPPOSITIDN <br />TO. THE. REZON I NG. I NO.1 CATED. THAT PDLK STREET I.S THE DN.L Y MEANS OF INGRESS AND EGRESS <br />FROM RAILROAD BDULEVARD. To. AREAS'NORTH DF THE PRDPOSED REZONiNG, AND INDUSJRIALIZA- <br />TIDN DF THIS AREA WDULD PDSE SERIDUS PRDBLEMS TO THE USE DF THE AREAS NDRTH DF THE <br />PRDPOSED REZDNING FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES; WOULD DETER]ORATE PROPERTY VALUES AND <br />. . .' . . <br />MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE OWNERS NDW IN THE AREA TO REALIZE THE RESIDENTIAL VALUES <br />OF THEIR PROPERTIES.' THE SAME. PEOPLE QUESTIDNED THAT THIS AREA WOULD DEVELOP AS AN <br />I NDUSTR I AL AREA AND PO I N,TED OUT THAT THERE ARE A NUMBER OF OTHER AREAS..CURRENTL Y <br />ZONED FDR INDUSTRIAL USE IN THE CITY THAT ARE NOT PUT. TO. THE USE FDR WHICH .THEY <br />ARE ZONED. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />fOLLOWING THE DISCUSSION THE CDMMITTEE RECDMMENDED THAT.. THE ITEM BE REFERRED BACK <br />TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR FURTHER STUDY. <br /> <br />2. ApPLICATIDN FDR RETAIL MALT BEVERAGE CLASS A LICENSE FOR PREMISES AT 42 WEST 8TH <br />AVENUE TO BE KNDWN AS THE SCHDONER, SUBMITTED ByTDMMIE THOMAS - THE APPLICATI,DN <br />FOR LICENSE TO. DfSPENSE ALCDHDLIC BEVERAGES SUBMITTED BY MR.. THDMAS WAS REFERRED <br />TO THE CDMMITTEE AND CDNSIDERABLE DISCUSSIDN DN THE SUBJECT WAS HAD BY THE CDMMITTEE. <br /> <br />'I <br /> <br />THE CHIEF DF POLICE REPORTED THAT HE HAD NDT APPROVED NOR REJECTED THE LICENSE AP- <br />PLlCATI.DN ALTHOUGH .IN ALL fAIRNESS, HE REPORTED THAT THERE HAD BEEN NO. DERDGATORY <br />INFO,RMATION D.E.VELDPED DN MR.. THDMA.S.. IT WAS. LIKEWisE PDINTED DUT BY A BUS,I'NESSMAN <br />. . <br />FRDM THE AREA JHAT: THERE ARE AMPLE LOCATIDNS .IN THI~ PARTICULAR AREA WHERE ALCOHOLIC <br />'BEVERAGES ARE CURRENTLY, SOLD .AND THAT. I.N LIGHT DF THE PAST EXPERIEN,CE WITH A FORMER <br />ESTABLISHMENT OPERATED AT THIS ADDRESS, HE CDULD NDT HELP BUT BELIEVE THAT JRAFFIC <br />DF A KIND DETRIMENTAL TO THE AREA AS A WHOLE WOULD BE GENERATED IF AN ADDITIONAL <br />LIQUOR ESTABLISHMENT WER~ ALLOWED I~ THE AREA. IT WAS PDINTED OUT THAT THERE ARE <br />. . . . <br />TWELVE ESTABLISHMENTS DISPENSING ALCOHDLIC BEVERAGES WITHIN A ONE AND A HALF BLOCK <br />AREA OF THE I~TERS~~TION D~8TH,AvENUE AND WILLAMETTE STREET, AN~ THAT SIX OF THESE <br />ARE IN CLDSE PROXIMITY TO THE APPLICANT'S LDCATIDN. ALL PERSONS CONCERNED .EXPRESSED <br />FAITH IN MR. THDMAS'S OPERATIDN BUT DID NDT FEEL THAT THE REQUESTED APPLICATIDN FELL <br />WITHIN THE STATUTDRY L.IMITS DF NECESSITY DR .CDNV.ENIENCE TO. THE PUBLIC,. BASED DN <br />THESE SITUATIDNS~ ,IT WAS RECDMMENDED THAT THE LI~ENSE APPLICATIDN BE DENI.ED. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />3. INFDRMA~ION REGARDING TENTATIVE DATES DN LIBRARY BUILDING PRDGRAM - THE CITY MANAGER <br />INDICATED HE HAD A CDMMUNICATIDN FRDM 7HE LIBRARIAN WHICH SET FDRTH CERTAIN TENTA- <br />TIVE DATES. WITH RESPECT TO. THE LIBRARY. BUILDING PRDGRAM.. THESE DATES ARE:. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />j <br />21 <br />I <br />j <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />l <br />I <br />} <br />I <br />~: <br /> <br />fEBRUARY 7, 1958 <br />fEBRUARY 1.0, 1958 <br />fEBRUARY 12-26,. 1958 <br />MARCH 3, 1958 <br />MARCH 7 , 1958 <br />MARCH 10, 195B <br /> <br />fINAL PLANS ~ SPECIFICATIDNS TQ COUNCIL COMMITTEE <br />fINAL PLANS & SPECIFICATIDNS TO. CITY CDUNCIL <br />BI DADVERT.I.S I NG <br />BID OPENING <br />BIDS REVIEWED BY CDUNCIL CDMMITTEE <br />CDNTRACTS AWARDED BY "TY CDUNCIL <br /> <br />IT WAS INDICATED THAT THE ABOVE DATES ARE TENTATIVE DNLY AND SUBJECT TO. CHANGE. <br /> <br />PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE <br />I. VACATIDN DF A PDRTIDN D~ 33RD AVENUE BETWEEN FERRY AND HILYARD ~TREETS - REPRE- <br />SENTATIVES O~ THE CDMMITTEE DROVE TO .AN AREA BETWEEN FERRY AND HILrARD STREETS <br />ON WHICH A REQUESTED YACATION ENTERED BY. THE CITY HAD BEEN SUBMITTED. THE VACA- <br />TION WOULD REMOVE ,A FDRMER RDADWAY THAT IS NOWNGER NEEDED FDR fiOAD PURPDSES <br />SINCE 33RD'AvENUE-HASBEEN'ESTABLISHEQ ON AN EAST/WEST BASIS ACROSS THE AMAZON <br />CHANNEL AND'DIRECTLY CONNE~TING WITH HILYARD STREET.. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />A MAP OF THE AREA WASSHDWN TO :THE COMMITTEE AND BASED ON THEIR OBSERVATIDNS <br />~ND THE MAP IT WAS RECDMMENDED THAT THE PRDPOSED STREET VACATIDN BE APPRDVED. <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />I, <br />" <br /> <br />e <br />