Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />------.---- <br />- ._~-- - --~---~- <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />123 <br /> <br />3/24/58 <br /> <br />~ "....: ; <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e. <br /> <br />.1 <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />'I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />!, <br />11 <br />I' <br />r! <br /> <br />FINANC1AL. STATEMENTS. WILL NOT.BE NECESSARY O~ AN ANNUAL BASIS) BUT:THAT IN . <br />THE EVENT OF PROPOSALS FOR A RA.:rE CHANGE OR, CHANGE.S, THE COUNC IL' SHALL RE- <br />SERVE THE RIGHT TO ASK FOR SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS THEY DEEM NECESSARY <br />FOR WHATEVER PERIOD OF TIME THEY DEEM NECESSARY. <br />I <br /> <br />I T WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR:. MCGAFFEY THAT ITEM 4 OF' THE COM-' <br />M1TTEE REPORT BE ADOPTED. .MOTION CARRIED; <br /> <br />PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE . . . <br />I. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 35TH <br />AVENUE BETWEEN WILLAMETTEdAND DONALD STREETS - CLARENCE,:: HINES, SUPERINTEN- <br />DENT-CLERK OF SCHOOL 01 STR ICr#4., APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMITTEE AND RE- , <br />PORTED T.,AT THE: SCHOOL BOARD HAD CONSIDERED THE REQUEST. fOR SIDEWALKS RUN- <br />NiNG ADjAcENT TO THEIR; PROPERTY ON THE NORTH SIDE Of 35TH AVENUE BETWEEN <br />. WI LLAMETTE:> AND DONALD STREETS~. MR. HiNES I NDI CATED .THAT THE SCHOOL BOARD <br />. . . '. . <br />HAD AGREED AND DIRECTED THAT THE PARKING AREA ADJACENT TO THE STREET BE <br />GRADED AND GRAVELLED TO PROVIDE A WALKWAY FOR STUDENTS PROcEEDING to AND <br />"FROM THE KINDERGARTEN CLASSES .HELD .,N rHEBA~EMENTOF .THE CH,LDRENSHosp,- <br />TAL AT DONALD AND PEARL STREETS. <br /> <br />INQUIRY WAS LIKEWISE MADE AS TO WHETHER THE COUNCIL COULD REQUIRE THE <br />SCHOOL BOARD TO PAY FOR THE' PAVING OF SIDEWALKS OR.P:AY FOR OTHER LOCAL <br />IMPROVEMENTS TO WHICH IT MIGHT BE IN OPPOSITION. IT,WAS AGREED THAT THE <br />CITY ATTORNEY SHOULD INVESTIGATE. THIS FOR FUTURE CONSIDERAT10N. <br /> <br />WITH REFERENCE TO THE SIDEWALK, IT WAS RECO~MENDED THAT THE PREVIOUS AP- <br />PRO-VAL OF. THE PUBL i C . WORKS COMM I TTEE: FOR A CONCRETE SIDEWALK. BE. RESCI NDED <br />SINCE THE SCHOOL DISTRICT HAVE NOW INDICATED T~EY.WILL I~STAI.L A GRAVEL <br />WALKWAY' AS WAS ORIGINALLY REQUESTED BY RESIDENTS OF THE. AREA. <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER' SECONDED. BY MR. EDMUNDS.THAT ITEM' IOF THE <br />PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />2. CONSIDERATION OF SEWERS IN THE VIC~NITY OF fLORAL HILL DRIVE - IT WAS EX- <br />PLAINED THAT A REQUEST FOR SEWERS ALONG fLORAL HILL DRIVE HAD'BEEN' RECEIVED <br />INDICATING HEALTH HAZARDS AND OTHER HAZARDS BECAUSE THE AREA, IS. NOT PROPERLY <br />SERVED WITH SEWERS. THE CITY MANAGER INDICATED- THAT FUNDS ARE IN THE CUR- <br />RENT YEAR BUDGET FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE SEWER, AND THE COMMITTEE RE- <br />COMMENDED THAT .THE .SEWER CONSrRUCTIO~pROCEEQ. <br /> <br />j -! <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED. BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED. BY MR. EDMUNDS THAT, ITEM 2 OF,THE COM:" <br />MHTEE REPORT BE ADOPTED. ROLLCALL -VOTE., ALL- COUNC.I LMEN PRESENT VOT I NGI <br />AYE, MOT 1 ON CARR I ED. I <br /> <br />PUBL-I C SAfETY COMMITTEE, <br />I. DISCUSSION REGARDING' SAFETY HAZARDS AT THE INTER~ECTION OF 17TH AVtNUE AND' <br />WASH I tGJ:O:N STREET - A PETITION SIGNED BY A NUMBER. OF RESIDENTS IN.THE V'ICINITY <br />OF 17TH AVENUE AND WASHINGTON STREET EXPRESSING CONSIDERABLE CONCERN OVER THE <br />NUMBER OF ACClaENTS A"t lHE .1.NrERSEcTIONAND..THE .DANGER.TO PEOPLE IN.TI-!E-AREA <br />BECAUSE OF SUCH ACCIDENTS WAS EXPLAINED TO THE COMMITTEE. THE TRAFF1C: ENGI- <br />NEER REPORTED ON THE HI STOR.Y OF ACC I DENTS AT THE I NTERSECT ION' IN WH I CH. HE I N- <br />DICATED THAT THE AVERAGE HAD BEEN 2;6 ACCIDENTS PER YEAR FOR :rHE. PAST SIX <br />YEARS AND. TWO. Acel DENTS, PER. YEAR FOR THE PAST TWO YEARS Wil TH- 98.5% OF. THESE <br />OCCURRING DURING THE DA.YLIGHT'HOURS. IT WAS INDICATED THAT PRIOR TO JULY 1954 <br />THE .INTERSECTION WAS PROTECTED BY STOP SIGNS STOPPING TRAFF.IC ON WASHINGTON <br />STREET AND THAT THE .1 NC IDENCE OF ACC I DENTS WAS HIGHER WHEN PROTECTED BY STOP <br />SIGN THAN NOW WITHOUT STOP SIGN. Two FATAL ACCIDENTS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AT <br />THE INTERSECTION SINCE JANUARY I, 1941 - ONE OCCURRING ON DECEMBER 20, 1945 <br />AND THE SE;COND OCCURRI NGON . fE~RUARY. 13, .1958. <br /> <br />THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER REPORTED THAT THE INTERSECTION IS NO~ PARTICULARLY BLIND <br />ALTHOUGH THERE ARE HEDGES, SHRUBS AND BUILT UP LAWNS. WHICH DETRACT FROM VISION. <br />THE TRAFFIC VOLUME ON 117TH AVENUE. APPROXIMATES 500 VEHICLES DAILY AND ON,WASH- <br />I NGTON STREET, 300 VEH I CLES DA I L Y, WH I CH IS PREDOM'I NANTL Y LOCAL TRAFF I C SERV- <br />ING PEOPLE :,N THE SURROUNDING AREA. THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER RECOMMENDED TO COR- <br />RECT THE, S l.iuAT'1 ON BY STOPP I NG TRAFF I C ON 17TW AVENUE AT WASH I NGTON STREET, <br />ON .LAWRENCE SifREET AT 17TH. AVENUE, ON 17:rH AVENUE AT LINCOLN' STREET, AND ON <br />CHARNEL-TON STREET AT 17TH AVENUE. I THE USE OF~STOP SIGNS- IN THIS' MANNER WI-LL <br />DISCOURAGE THE' USE OF 17TH AVENUE- AS AN ARTERIAL AND WILL TEND TO PROTECT THE <br />SIDE STREETS ALONG 17TH AVENUE FROM JEFFERSON TO OLIVE STREET~ <br /> <br />THE COMM'I TTE.E DISCUSSED THE RECOMMENDAT ION OF .THE TRAFFIC ENG I NE.ER AND RECOM- <br />MENDED THAT. THE.. RECOMMENDATIONS: FOR T.HE INSTALLATION OF STOP SIGNS AS IND.I- <br />CAl'EDABOVE BE .APPROVED. . ,i I <br /> <br />I. , <br /> <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />! <br />" <br />J <br />i <br />I <br />il <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />t <br />I <br />'1 <br />,t <br />~ <br />