06/23/1958 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~ -CIRCUIT COUR 215 DEFENDANTS e l 6/23/58 -- ----::~_---=-:::-:-:-- -:::-...::..~----=---~-=~:..-: --_-::::.::-..:~-------.:---=-- -::':-~-~:...:---:-::;~---...:...:.::--_=-- -:..::...~=--:-=---~ -----=~=--~~ =-=-::-:_.:_,"=-~.::_--- ---_--=..:~ -~--::: ------==--.,--~ - - --- ~-=-.:-_==--=-:;:-~..=:--- ~::-=-:---:-:~ -~~--;--::-::::::-~~=---~---- ---=---------:=:=...----;:-- ~ ~_____~~_~_ _~_~ ~=;c,,--~~=~_ ___~~~~ ___~_ _- ~_~_~_~__~_ _ ~ _d.' __ __~~U _~~~~ ~> I 1 I ; COMM I TTEE ~ OF THE- WHOLE~ - 1 I. PAYMENT Of BILL PRESENTED BY GODLOVE THE PLUMBER - PAYMENT Of BILL WHICH HAD BEEN I ,- i SUBMITTED BY GODLOVE THE PLUMBER fOR WORK DONE AT 1886 UNIVERSITY STREET AND ~WHICH I ! HAD BEEN HELD IN~COMMITTEE WAS AGAIN DISCUSSEri. -MR. GODLOVE SUBMITTED A BREAKDOWN i I Of HIS CHARGES AS REQUESTED BY THE COMMITTEE. THE DIRECTOR Of PUBLIC WORKS STATE[), ) THAT THIS WAS AN UNUSUAL PROBLEM DUE TO THE fACT THAT THERE IS NO MANHOLE AVAILABLE I I SO"THAT THE PLUMBER COULD CHECK TO"SEE If THE STOPPAGE WAS IN THE MAIN LINE~ HE J POINTED OUT THAT THE COUNCIL'SHO~LD BE C~UTIOUS IN SETTiNG A PRECEDENT AND ANY , I PAYMENT WHICH WASMA~E ~O GODLOVE THE ~LUMBER MUST BE A REASONABLE CHARGE THAT" I : COULD BE JUSTifiED ONLY BY THE. CITY'S OWN COST Of DOING THE SAME JOB. THE COM- i I ~- i MITTEE RECOMMENDED BY A 3 ~TO 2 VOTE THAT THE CITY PAY HALf Of $274.17 WHICH IS \ fOR THE TIME fOR PLUMBERS AND LABORERS TO DIG A HOLE IN THE ALLEY, OR $137.09." , I I II IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. HARTMAN THAT ITEM I Of THE REPORT Of i Ii THE COMMITTEE Of THE WHOLE BE APPROVED. ROLLCALL VOTE. ALL COUNCILMEN PRESENT ! e II VOTING AYE, MOTION CARRIED. 1 j I , , 2. PETITION fOR STORM SEWER ON THE~ EAST SIDE OF HAYES STREET SOUTH OF i8TH AVENUE - I j. THE COMM I TTEE VI SI TED THE AREA" ON WHI CH" A PET ITI ON HAD BEEN RECE I VEDfOR I N- ; STALLATlON OF A STORM SEWER ON~THE EAST SIDE- Of- HAYES STREET SOUTH Of~ 18TH I I AVENUE. IT WAS AGREED THAT-THIS AREA IS BADLY IN NEED Of A STORM SEWER BUT AT I liTHE PRESENT TIME THE~E ARE NO fUNDS AVAILABLE AND OTHE~ AREAS HAVE PRIORITY. f ,I THE CITY ENGINEER INDICATED THAT HE THOUGHT THE RESIDENTS WOULD BE WILLING TO ~.'.I I GET ALONG WITH A DITCH AT PRESENT WITH PROMISE Of A STORM SEWER IN THE fUTU~E: ;1 HE POINTED OUT THAT IT WOULD BE NECESSARY TO GET AN EASEMENT fOR A RIGHT-Of- h WAY OR HAVE AN ALLEY DEDICATED THROUGH THIS PROPERTY. THE COMMITTEE RECOM- II , MENDED THAT If THE PEOPLE INVOLVED WILL DEDICATE RIGHTS-Of-WAY FOR ALLEYS, THE i I ' CITY WILL ATTEMPT TO RELIEVE THE SITUATION TEMPORARILY WITH A DRAIf'J4GE DITCH i PROVIDED fENCES, SHRUBS AND OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS ARE MOVED BACK 7 fEET ON EACH I I SIDE Of THE PROPOSED ALLEY RIGHTS-Of-WAY. J \ I IT WA~ MOVED~BY MR. SH~ARER SECONDED BY MR. HARTMAN THAT ITEM 2 Of THE REPORT ! ~ Of THE COMMITTEE: Of THE WHOLE BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. ~ I : I I II 3. CONSENT PETITION fOR ANNEXATION Of AREA AT 29TH AVENUE AND CITY VIEW STREET PRE- ; SENTED BY FRANCES C. SHIELDS - THE COMMITTEE VIEWED THE AREA WHICH HAD BEEN , REQUESTED fOR ANNEXATION BY 100% CONSENT BY FRANCES C~ SHIELDS. THE ASSISTANT i ~ CITY MANAGER EXPLAINED THAt PART OF MRS. SHIELDS' PROPERTY HAD BEEN ANNEXED ON ! : A PREVIOUS ANNEXATION, AND SHE IS NOW REQUESTING THAT ALL Of HER PROPERTY BE ~ I INCLUDED IN THE CITY LIMITS. THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THIS REQUEST BE ~ ,I GRANTED. , I' 1 J I 1< - i.1 I T WAS MOVED BY MR~. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. HARTMAN THAT ITEM 3 Of THE REPORT j; I Of THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE ~E APPRO~ED. MOT~ON CARRIED. ; ) 'I t I,j ,I ~I ! 4. REQUEST FOR VACATION Of THE WEST HALf Of NORTH PARK STREET - TH~ ASSISTANT CITY ~ I MANAGER INfORMED THE COMM~TTEE.THAT.THE BOARD Of COUNTY COMMI~SIONERS, IS"RE- ~ I QUESTING THAT THE CITY OF EUGENE ~ACATE THt WEST H~Lf Of NORTH PARK STREET SO I b THAT A PARKING LOT CAN BE CON~TRUCTED TO SERVE THE NEW COUNTY COURTHOUSE. THE r r \ _ I COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT TH.IS REQUEST BE ,GRANTED AND THAT THE NECESSARY ORDI- I.' W j. NANCES I N IT I AT ING THE -VACATION. -BE PASSED. l I, II IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SEtONDED BY MR. HA~TMAN THAT ITEM 4 9f THE REPORT f I OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE BE APPROVED. ~ MOTION CARRIED. I j I f ~ I. I I, 5. PROTEST BY WARREN WILE~Y OF' RIVERVIEW SEWER, SECT,ION #3 - MR-. WILEY APPEARED ) I BEFORE THE COMMITTEE AND PROTESTED A fORTHCOMING SEWER ASSESSMENT WHICH HE ! I CLAIMED WOULD NOT BENEfiT HIS PROPERTY AND WOULD COST HIM APPROXIMATELY $3000. ~ THE CITY ENGINEER EXPLAINED THAT THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE LAND IN THE AREA MADE IT I I . - -. , I IMPRACT I CAL TO -LOCATE ~THE_.SEWER. OTHER THAN -THROUGH MR. WI LEY'S PROPERTY, AND ~ I' WHILE MR. W~ILEY~'S PROPERJ-Y WOULD NOT BE IMMEDIATELY BENEfiTED, IT WOULD BE it ,I. BENEFI TED IN !HE. fUTURE. HE", fURTHER EXPLA I NED_ .THAT -THE ENGI NEER I NG DEPAR.TMENT i _'. . HAD PLANNED THE SEWER SO AS TO BENEfiT THE MOST PROPERTY NOT ONLY NOW BUT fOR ; I~ I fUTURE DEVELOPMENT Of THE AREA. THE COMM I TTEE I NDI CATED THEY WERE I N SYMPATHY il I.' WITH MR. WIL_E;Y~S PROB,~f~;BUT fELT THAT WHILE MR. WIL~Y W_OULD DERIVE NO IMMEDIATE !.' ! BENEfiT fROM THE PROPOSED SEWER, fUTURE DEVELOPMENT~ WOULD COMPENSATE HIM fOR ANY :1 l' OUTLAY INVOLVED AT PRESENT. THEY fURTHER IN61CAtED HE COULb BANCROFT THE ASSESS- :.1 ' MENT AND PAY IT Off OVER A TEN YEAR PERIOD." ; I ; l . Ii IT WAS MO~ED BY MR. .S~~A.RE~ _~~CO~D~~~ ~ByMR.-: -H~RTM~N :~HAT ~ IT_EM "5~OFTHE ~R~PORT i _ ,I Of THE COMMITTEE Of THE WHOL~E BE APPROVED... M~TION CARRI~ED, MR. MOHOLM AND ~.l _ I,: MRS. LAURI-S VOTING NAY. MR. MOLHOLM STATEDTHAT~HE~IS~NOT AGAINST THE IN';~- 1, ~ STALLATION Of THE SEWER BUT WOULD LIKE TO SEE SOME WAY fOUND TO RELIEVE COM- ~ 11 PARABLE SITUATION.S. ~I , '..l~ !: :.:..