|
<br />335 ~
<br />e
<br />
<br />
<br />.:-.=.._ '0 _--- __ h ,_ ,_ _-.-._ ..___ '__. '__ __ 'n. h _ __ __ __" _I ?/27f5_B-
<br />
<br />-IT-- - .
<br />-.- ...-., u_ 11_____ ___n_ -, n ,-- ,-- - -. . -. -.' , ---,
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />I I
<br />Ii
<br />I 'i COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE -. I
<br />Ii I. REQUEST Of STATE HiGHWAY DEPARTME'NT f(jR EASEMENT TO CARRY STORM "WATER VIA CULVERT I,.
<br />I! TO W'LLAMETTE;:RIVER FROM RIVER, ROAD ACROSS CIT'( RIGHT-OF-'WAYfOR OUT-FALL SEWER TO I
<br />1\ SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT - THE ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER EXPLAINED T,HAT THE STATE HIGH- II
<br />I: ,WAY DEPARTMENT ''-S REQUEST I NG T'HE ABOVE DE,SCR I BED EASEMENT TO CARRY STORM WATER II
<br />F ACRO'SS THE CITY RIGHT-"OF-WAY 'fOR THE OUTFALL SEWER LINE WHICH RUNS TO THE SEWA'GE ~'
<br />r TREATMENT PLANT. T~ECOMMITTEE CONsiDEREti T~t REQUEST AND R~COMMENDED THAT'~T 'BE i
<br />11 APPROVED, AFTER THE CITY ATTORNEY AND CITY ENGINEER HAVE PROPERLY ~ROTECTED THE :
<br />I: CITY'S INTERESTS, ftND THE PROPER CITY OfFICIALS BE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE ~.l.
<br />: NECESSARY DOCUMENTS. I
<br />J ~
<br />
<br />'Il.: 2. PURCHASE Of PROPERTY 'NORTH OF MAHLON-SWEEr AI RPORT - AT THE COMM I TTEE MEET I NG Of Iii
<br />;i OCTOBER 17, 1958 THE COMMITTEE HAD CONSIDERED EXERCISING AN OPTION TO BUY A I
<br />d 500'X400' PARCEL OF LAND TO EXTEN~ THE APPROAtH L'IGHT SYSTEM. IT HAD BEEN RECOM- t
<br />Ii MENDED'THAT THE PROPER CITY OFFICIALS fURTHER NEGOTIATE WITH MR. FLANAGAN fROM ' II
<br />_ II WHOM THE PURCHASE WAS TO BE MADE, FOR THE PURCHASE OF ADDITIONAL PROPERTY. THE i
<br />~ : ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER ~XPLAINEb THAT THE CITYNdW HAS AN O~TldN TO PURCHASE AN r
<br />(i ADDITIONAL 7.4 ACRES ADJACENT TO THE 500'X400'AREA WHICH WAS ALREADY UNDER OPTION I
<br />I FOR A TOTAL PRICE ON ALL THE PROPERTY OF $5146.'67. ' THE COMMITTEE FELT THAT THIS ' I
<br />~ ADDITI~NALPROPERTY WOULD BE NEEDED !OR ~URTHER DEVELOPMENT of,MAHLON-SWEET AIRPORT ;
<br />1\ AND RECOMMENDED THAT THE PROPER CITY OfFICIALS BE AUTHORIZED TO PURCHASE A TOTAL :1
<br />I Of 11.69 ACRES AT A TOTAL COST 'QF $5146.67. II
<br />I Ii :,'
<br />\,j 3. REQUEST FOR EXTENSION Of ,TIME fOR OE,MOLIT(ION OF BUILDING AT 1648 PATTERSON STREET ;\
<br />1\ BY MRS. BEAUBIEN - THE COMMITTE,E 'DROVE TO AND VIEWED THE STRUCTURE '''' QUESTION, .'1
<br />I: AND 'THE ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER' EXPLAINED THAT MRS. BEAUBIEN HAD AGREED TO'HAVE: II
<br />~ THE STRUCTURE TORNOO~N BX QCTOBER' I, 1~58: A RECENT tOMMUNICATl'ON f~bM HER IND~~ t
<br />~ CATED THAT DUE TO ILLNESS 'NTH~ FAMILX ~HE WAS 'FINANCIALLY~ABLE TO HAVE ~HE ~
<br />Ii STR.UCTURE REMOVED AT THE' PRESENT TIME AND REQUEST:ED A fURTHER EXTENSI ON .~HE :1
<br />r COMMITTEE CONSIDERED THE REQUEST AND RECOMMENDED THAT A SIX MONTHS EXTENSION BE :1
<br />Ii GRANTED FROM SEPTEMBER 30, 1958 PROV I DING THE STRUCTURE IN QU,EST I ON REMA I NS VACANT. j.'l.,,'
<br />!I '
<br />I 4. SPONSORSH I P OF CENTRAL ,LANE COUNTY P,LANN I NG 'COMM I 5S I ON - T~E Ass I STA. NT C. I TY MANAGER 1'.1
<br />I EXPLAINED THAT THE CENTRALLAN~ COUNT~ PLANNING COMMISSION IS REQUESTING AN EX~EN- i
<br />: S I ON OF THE I R AGRfEMENT WH I CH' ELAPSES -AS' pf TH IS MONT'i'." THE ,ONL Y CHANGE IN ,TH I S i
<br />I'.' AGREEMENT FROM PREV I OUS AGRE'EM.ENTS I S THAT THE ,TWO .YEAR PROV Is I ON I S DELETED A'ND :..1,'
<br />, THAT ANY PARTY TO THE AGREEMENT MAY WITHDRAW FROM PARTICIPATION IN THE 'COMMISSION I
<br />'i: AT THE END OF ANY BUDGE'T YEAR .S'EVERAL MEMBERS Of THE COMMITTEE EXPRESSED THEM- l
<br />1 SELVES AS FEELING THE CITY HAS OUTGROWN THE PRESENT ARRANGEMENT WITH THE t~NTRAL I
<br />~ LANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AND fELT THAT THE CITY SHOULD AT LEAST MAKE A ~
<br />I: START DUR I NG THE NEXT BUDGET YEAR IN SETT I NG UP A PLAN~ I Ne> DE;PARTMENT, AND THAl: :\
<br />I'; WH ILE TH I S NEW DEPARTMENT SHOULD WORK CLOSEL Y WITH THE COUNTY PLANN I NG COMM (SS I ON i
<br />~ THERE SHOULD BE A GRADUAL SHI~TING OF RESPONSIBILITY FdR CITY PLANNING T6 THE ~I
<br />~ CITY'S OWN PLANNING DEPARTMENT. THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE CONTRACT BE ~
<br />(I EXTENDED TO JUNE 30, 1959. I:
<br />~ ~
<br />1-, /,1
<br />I ',:..... 5. PURCHASE Of PROPERTY FOR THE EXTENSION Of CHAMBERS STREET FROM 6TH TO 8TH AVE.NUE - (
<br />,: MR. UREY TOLD THE COMM I 1TEE THAT HE H-AD CONTACTED MR. WARD FOR tHE: P'URCHASE OF
<br />Ii H1S PROPERTY ON WH I CH I S NOW LOCATED A SAW F I L I N'G SHOP. I TWAS MR .UREY' S OP I N I ON ,
<br />!: THAT $1500 IS A REASONABLE PRICE FOR THIS BUILDING INASMUCH AS MR. VJARD HAD RECENTlY;!
<br />.j MADE IMPROVEMENTS AND THAT IT IS IMPOSSIBLE ~OR HIM TO ~OVE THE BUIL~ING. AETER ~
<br />II~ SOME CONSIDERATION THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT PURCHASE OF THE BU'-LDING At THE ~
<br />i PRICE RECOMMENDED BY MR. UREY OF $1500 BE APPROVED, AND THAT THE WARD PROPERTY BE ~
<br />Ii PURCHASED AT A TOTAL PRICE OF $9074.80 WHICH INCLUDES NECESSARY LAND AND 'SEVERANCE :.1
<br />;, e ' 'I DAMAGES. ~l
<br />
<br />~ IT WAS FURTHER ~XPLAI~Eti By'MR. U~E~ THAT HE I~STILL NEGOTIATING FOR 'THE ~dDDARD, Ii
<br />~ PROPERTY AND OTHER SMALL PARCELS OF LAND WHICH ARE NECESSARY fOR THE EXTENSION OF . j
<br />~ CHAMBERS STREET. THE ASSISTANT ~ITYMANAGER INfORMED tHE COMMITTEE T~AT SUF~I- r
<br />I; C.' ENT MONEY IS NOT BUDGETED' CURRE.NTl Y TO PURCHASE, MORE 'PROPE"RTY AND niAT THE 'C I TY ;:!
<br />I; HAS ALREADY COMMITTED $44,000 OF THE $48,000 BUDGETED fOR ACQUISITION OF LAND FOR ~
<br />i RIGHTS-Of-WAY. HE SUGGESTED THE POSSIBLE USE Of THE EMERGENCY FUND IF FURTHER ~
<br />~ PROPERTY IS TO BE ACQUIRED IN THE IMMEDIATE FUTURE. THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ~
<br />t THAT NEGOTIATIONS BE CONTINUED FOR THE PURCHASE OF 'PROPERTY NECESSARY FOR THE ~
<br />II.... EXTENSION OF CHAMBERS STREET FROM 6TH TO 8TH AVENUE. ~
<br />I ;
<br />~ 6. REQUEST TO PURCHASE LOT ON 'S~UTHWisT CORNE~ OF 24TH AVENUE AND POTTiR STREET, i
<br />l~ BEESON REALTY - THE COMMITTEE D,ROVE TO 24TH AVENU,E AND POTTER STREET AND VIEWED :
<br />~ THE Loi WHICH THE CITY HAD ACQUJ~ED FOR THE OPENING .OF 24TH AVENUE. AFTER THE ~
<br />j:i PAVING OF 24TH .AVENUE THE CITY NOW HAS A LOT 38.3'XI20' WHICH UNDER CURRENT ZONING :,;
<br />I 1..: REGULATIONS WOULD NOT PERM IT A ,SUITABLE DWELLING. , THE ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER !i
<br />I' EXPLAINED THAT THE BEESON REAlT'y'-COMPANY'HAS OfFERED' THE CITY $900 fOR THE LOT :1
<br />~ SINCE THEY HAD ACQUIRED,AN OPTION ON ~NOUGHfROPERTY TO THE SOUTH OF THIS LOTTO ~
<br />W MAKE A LOT OF A SIZE LARGE ENOUGH 'FOR A HOUSE dR DUPLEX. AfTER SOME DISCUSSION ~)
<br />II THE COMM I TTEE RECOMMENDED THAT TH I S -OFFER BE REJECTED BUT THAT NEGOT I AT IONS BE ::
<br />i CONTINUED AS THE COMMITTEE _FELT THE LOT IS WORTH CONSIO~RABLYMORE THAN TH~ ~
<br />'.J PRI CE' OFFERED. -. )'..'1.'
<br />I I
<br />II i
<br />_ h r.
<br />. I' '.1
<br />1,' !I
<br />I I
<br />~:: . ,:1
<br />~ \~~
<br />"
<br />I
<br />
|