Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> "... 9 0 <br /> NOVEMBER 28, 1960 e <br /> COUNCIL CHAMBER <br /> 11/28/60 EUGENE, OREGON <br /> I , II <br /> I <br /> THE REGULAR MEETING or THE COMMON COUNCIL or THE CITY or EUGENE WAS HELD NOVEMBER 17, 1960 <br /> AND ADJOURNED TO NOVEMBER 28, 1960 AT 7:30 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER. THE MEETING WAS CALLED TO I, I <br /> ORDER BY HIS HONOR MAYOR E. E. CONE WITH THE fOLLOWING COUNCILMEN PRESENT: I' <br /> , MR. SHEARER, MRS. LAURIS, " <br /> , <br /> MR. MOLHOLM, MR. MCGA~FEY, MR. CHATT, MR. MOYER, MR. WILSON AND MR. SWANSON. <br /> '. II <br /> Ii <br /> THE INVOCATION WAS GIVEN BY REV. DAVID WHITE. I' <br /> THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING HELD NOVEMBER ,I <br /> 17, 1960 WERE NOT AVAILABLE FOR APPROVAL AS :i <br /> OF THIS DATE AND WERE HELD OVER UNTIL THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING. :1 <br /> Ii <br /> INTRODUCTION OF NEW BUSINESS I, <br /> I' <br /> Ii " <br /> 'i <br /> I i: COUNCILMAN SHEARER STATED AT, THE RECENT LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES MEETING HELD IN SALEM, A NUMBER <br /> If d <br /> II OF PAPERS WERE PRESENTED AND A NUMBER or INDIVIDUALS SPOKE ON THE SUBJECT OF ANNEXATION. HE SUG- <br /> I <br /> GESTED THAT COPIES or THESE PAPERS BE OBTAINED FROM THE LEAGUE OF OREroN CITIES orFICIALS ANO THAT <br /> SUCH COPIES BE rORWARDED TO THE LANE COUNTY LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION, IN HOPES THAT SOME ACTION ON THE <br /> ANNECATION QUEST~S MIGHT BE TAKEN BY THE LEGISLATURE, WHI~ CONVENES IN JANUARY, 1961. <br /> COUNCILMAN SHEARER SUGGESTED THAT EXISTING STATE LAWS ARE SOMEWHAT ARCHAIC. HE ALSO PROPOSED p <br /> THAT A MEETING BE HELD WITH THE LEGISLATIVE DELtGATION ON THIS AND OTHER SUBJECTS, A~~HAT THE " e <br /> I: <br /> SPRINGrlELD CITY COUNCIL BE INVITED TO THIS MEETING. IT WAS rURTHER SUGGESTED THAT THE MEETING NOT " <br /> " <br /> I, <br /> BE CONFINED TO PROBLEMS OF ANNEXATION, BUT THAT IT COVER A NUMBER OF THE PROBLEMS CU~~ENTLY BEING <br /> rACED BY THE CITIES, SUCH AS ANNEXAT~, FINANCING AND OTHER AREAS THAT MIGHT BE REMEDIED BY STATE- <br /> WIDE LEGISLATION. <br /> THE MAYOR,SUGGESTED THAT SUCH A MEETING BE SET UP. <br /> No rORMAL ACTION WAS TAKEN BY THE COUNCIL. <br /> 2 THE CITY MANAGER REPORTED HE,HAD HELD DISCUSSIONS WITH REPRESENTATIVES or SCHOOL DISTRICT #4 I <br /> ON THE POSSIBIL'ITY Of ACQUIRING SOME PORTION or THE SO-CALLEO FRANCIS WILLARD PROPERTY LOCATED <br /> IMMEDIATELY SOUTH or THE LIBRARY BUILDING. HE STATED THE WHOLE OF THE PROPERTY HAD BEEN PRICED AT <br /> $125,000 AND SUGGESTED THAT A 60 FOOT PARCEL IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE LIBRARY AND RUNNING FROM <br /> OLIVE TO CHARNELTON STREET MIGHT BE OPTIONED AT A PRICE OF $35,000 TOTAL PRICE, WITH THE OPTION TO <br /> BE EFFECTIVE UNTIL NOVEMBER OF 1962. THE COUNC I L HELD SOME 0 I SCUSS 10 N ON TH I S PRO POSAL. <br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT THIS ITEM BE REFERRED TO THE COMMITTEE <br /> OF THE WHOLE. MOTION CARRIED. I, <br /> ,. <br /> " <br /> I' <br /> " <br /> 3 SOME DISCUSSION WAS HAD AMONG VARIOUS OF THE COUNCH MEMBERS WITH REGARD TO THE CONTINUATION II <br /> OF nE CONCRETE CHANNEL LINING FOR AMAZON CREEK. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ADMINISTRATION HAD HAD !! <br /> VARIOUS DISCUSSIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS ON THIS SUBJECT BUT THAT NOTHING HAD THUS FAR BEEN ACCOMPLISHED <br /> IN CONGRESS TOWARD THE EXTENSION OF THE CHANNEL LINING. <br /> FOLLOWING SOME DISCUSSION IT WAS MOVED BY MR. MOLHOLM SECONDED By'MR. MCGAFFEY THAT THE ADMINI- " <br /> STRATIVE STAFF BE INSTRUCTED TO PURSUE THE SUBJECT or ADDITIONAL CHANNEL LINING ON AMA~N CREEK AT 'I <br /> BOTH ENDS OF THE EXISTING CHANNEL LINING, AND THAT THE CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION BE CONTACTED TO THIS il <br /> END. MOTl ON CARR I ED. <br /> 4 THE CITY MANAGER REPORTED ON A VARIANCE WHICH HAD BEEN GRANTED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 18TH AVENUE <br /> AT PIERCE STREET FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A LAUNDROMAT. HE STATED THAT THE HOLDER OF THE VARIANCE <br /> ;i HAD COMPLIED WITH THE TERMS OF THE VARIANCE WITH REGARD TO A SETBACK FOR A FIVE FOOT PLANTING STRIP <br /> I; <br /> II ON THE WESTERLY SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. IT WAS FURTHER INDICATED THAT THERE MAY BE SOME QUESTION AS <br /> " <br /> TO THE SETBACK' FROM THE STREET, THAT THIS MATTER WOULD BE VERifiED AND REPORTED ON. No FORMAL ACTION <br /> WAS TAKEN ON THIS SUBJECT. I <br /> 'I <br /> REPORTS OF COMMITTEES I' <br /> .! <br /> " <br /> Ii <br /> I: A REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 23, 1960 i! <br /> ii I <br /> PRESENT: MAYOR CONE; COUNCILMEN SHEARER, LAURIS,MoLHOLM, MOYER, WILSON, SWANSON; COUNCILMEN <br /> ,/ELECT CHR I STENSEN ArID DEVERELL; C I T Y MANAGER; CITY RECORDER; DIRECTOR OF PUBLICWORKS; CH EF OF POL ICE; <br /> TRAFFIC ENGINEER; PLANNING CONSULTANT; ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT; CITY ATTORNEY; LT. SMARTT; MESSRS. e <br /> JONES AND LINDSTROM FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF OREGON; MRS. NIVEN; MRS. BUTLER; DAN WYANT OF THE EUGENE <br /> REGISTER-GUARD AND WENDY RAY OF RADIO STATION KUGN. <br /> ,: <br /> I' <br /> 5 !! I . REQUEST FOR CURB CUT EXTENSION ON CHARNELTON STREET AT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 220 WEST 7TH - <br /> REPRESENTATIVES OF THE COMMITTEE OBSERVED THE REQUESTED CURB CUT LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF i' <br /> I <br /> I " <br /> " CHARNELTON STREET, JUST SOUTH OF 7TH AVENUE, WHICH THE PROPERTY OWNER REQUESTED FOR APPROVAL. HE ,I <br /> II <br /> ASKED THAT AN EXISTING CURB CUT BE EXTENDED FROM 37 FEET TO 45 FEET. THE REQUEST STATED IF SUCH I: <br /> I CURB CUT WERE ALLOWED IT WOULD BE EASIER FOR CUSTOMERS TO ENTER THE STATION FROM CH~RNELTON STREET <br /> THAN IT IS AT THE PRESENT TIME. THE COMM I TTEE CONS I DERED THE MATTER AND RECOMMENDED THAT THE EXTENS I eN ii: <br /> BE GRANTED, WITH THE EXTENSION TO BE TO THE NORTH Of THE EXISTING CUT. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSL~. ~ : <br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MRS. LAUR'S THAT ITEM I OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE I' <br /> APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. , <br /> I' :i <br /> " <br /> I: : <br /> 6 2. REQUEST FOR CURB SIDEWALKS - <br /> I <br /> A. FRIENDLY STREET BETWEEN 24TH AVENUE AND 25TH AVENUE. A REQUEST FROM A PROPERTY OWNER LOCATED I <br /> AT 2467 FRIENDLY STREET FOR A CURB SIDEWALK WAS PRESENTED TO THE COMMITTEE WITH A RECOMMENDATION II <br /> i OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT THAT SUCH CURB SIDEWALKS BE ALLOWED. THE PUBLIC WORKS DEP~TMENT ALSO <br /> H RECOMMENDED THAT CURB SIDEWALKS BE ALLOWED ON BOTH SIDES OF FRIENDLY STREET BETWEEN 24TH AVENUE AND <br /> ,: I <br /> 28TH AVENUE. THE COMMITTEE VIEWED THE REQUESTED CURB SIDEWALK AT 2467 FRIENDLY STREET, AS WELL AS ,I <br /> ;i' <br /> THE WHOLE OF FRIENDLY STREET BETWEEN 24TH AND 28TH AVENUES AND RECOMMENDED THAT THE CURB SIDEWALK BE " <br /> 'I <br /> ALLOWED AT 2467 FRIENDLY STREET AND THAT CURB SIDEWALKS BE APPROVED ALONG BOTH SIDES OF FRW,ENDLY il <br /> STREET BETWEEN 24TH AND 28TH AVENUES. MOT'ON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. I: e <br /> :, <br /> ~ <br />