|
<br /> rq r-i 6
<br /> () 6
<br /> e
<br /> 8/26/63
<br /> -- ~~ -v_ "'.- ~ _._:~ - ~ . .----,..- ...:....- - c'-:r.--,. - ~ - , _."..-c -.-" -r _:-- - -......-- -- -
<br /> ,'-'" -~ "".- :-~~"',~ ~r.. ...._:-T-.
<br /> ..l -, ~ - ..'""" ~. "'-~" .,.....- ..... ~,-- -- . -- - ~- ----=--.,,-"'<<.---. - --' ~. ~- c..-~ ......... -",c,'''' . ~~ '_..A'-___~ -"",,-,--. - ~
<br /> I
<br /> COMMITTEE REPORTS
<br /> COMMITTEE MEETING HELD AUGUST 15, 1963:
<br /> "PRESENT: MAYOR CONE; COU~CILMEN CHATT, SWANSON, CHRISTENSEN, DEVERELL, CRAKES, AND
<br /> 'HAWK; CITY MANAGER; CITY ATTORNEY; CITY RECORDER; ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER;
<br /> ADMINISTR~TIVE ASSISTANT; LANE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; REPRESENTATIVES FROM
<br /> BUREAU OF PUBLIC ROADS, CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, LANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMIS-
<br /> SION, AND STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT; DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS.
<br /> I I. TRANSPORTATION STUDY, EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD AREA - MR. 'TOM EDWARDS, ASSISTANT STATE
<br /> HIGHWAY ENGINEER, INTRODUCED THE MEMBERS OF HIS GROUP AND STATED I T WOULD BE"
<br /> NECESSARY FOR THE STATE TO SUBMIT UP-TO-DA~E ORIGINAAND DESTINATION REPORT TO e
<br /> THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, THAT THE PREVIOUS STUDY MADE BY THE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
<br /> WOULD NOT BE A~G[PTABLE IN A REQUEST FOR FEDERAL FUNDS FOR HIGHWAY PU~POSES.
<br /> MR. EDWA~6s ~LSO LISTED SEVERAL REQUEST~ MADE'BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO BE
<br /> .. I NCLUDtb I N THE STUDY, OlliE BE'I NG A FORMAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SEVERALAGENC I ES
<br /> CONCERNED. COP I ES OF THE PROPOSED AGREEMENT WERE 0 I'STRI BUTEO TO REPRESEN'T:AT'I.VES
<br /> OF THE SEVERAL AGENCIES PRESENT WITH THE REQUEST_ THAT RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATIVE
<br /> ~F~ICERS OF tACH JURISDICT10N lNVOLVED MEET AT SOME LATER DATE FOR FORMULATION I
<br /> 'OF A PLAN. IN ASWER TO A QUESTION, MR. EDWARDS STATED THAT THE COST OF THE SUR-
<br /> VEY WOULD BE ABSORB~D BY THE RESEARCH DEPARTMENT OF THE OREGON STATE HIGHWAY DE~
<br /> PARTME'NT.. MR. EDWARDS THEN ANSWERED SEVERAL QUESTIONS RELATING TO TOPICS OTHER
<br /> THAN THE ONE FOR WHICH THE MEETING WAS CALLED.
<br /> 2 2. AIRPOR'T TERMINAL Bl,IlLDING ~ ~. .
<br /> A. CHANGE ORDER AUTHORIZATION - THE CITY MANAGER STATED THAT CHANGE ORDERS WERE
<br /> O"FTEN ROUT I NE IN MAJOR BUllD'ING C9NSTRUCTION AND ASKED THE COUNCIL'S PERMIS-
<br /> 'SIONTO AUTHORIZE CHANGE ORDERS uNtikR$IOOO ~N CONST~UCTION ciF T~E TERMINAL:
<br /> BUILDING AT MAHLON SWEET A"IRPORT. MR. SWANSON MOVED SECONDED BY'MR.CRAKES
<br /> TO APPROVE THE REQUEST AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROV~ CHANGE-
<br /> ORDERS UP TO $lpOO WITHOU~ COUN~IL APPROVAL. MOTION CARRIED.
<br /> 3 B. AUTOMAT'I C . DOOR OPERATORS - PEND'ING FURTHER INFORMATION, THIS ITEM WAS'HE~~
<br /> TO COMMITTEE MEETING ON THURSDAY, AUGUST 22, 1963, CONCERNING THE USE AND
<br /> NUMBER OF COMPRESSORS NEEDED SHOULD A PORTION OF THE DOOR OPERATOR~ BE AP- '
<br /> PROVED FOR '-NSTALLAT rON.
<br /> , -
<br /> 4 C. SPR1NKLER SYSTEM - THE CITY MANAGER STAT~D THAT SHOU~D THE TER~INAL BUILDING
<br /> AT TH,E AIRPORT HAVE AN AUTOMATIC, SPRINKLER SYSTEM INSTALLED AND SUFFICIENT ~
<br /> WATER SUPPLIED AT THE AIRPORT; THERE WOULD BE AN ANNUAL REDUCTION 'Of APPROXI-
<br /> MATELY $6~OO IN THE fiRE INSURANCE PREMIUM. HE ALSO STATED A PRICE OF AP- I
<br /> PROXIMATELY $3000 PER YEAR HAD BEEN QUOTED BY EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD I
<br /> fOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED 15 YEARS, OR UNTIL RECEIPTS "EQUALED 12; OF THE' I
<br /> INVESTMENT IN THE LINE, WHICHEVER IS FIRST. MR. CHATTMOVED:SECONDEDBY
<br /> MR. CRAKES TO NEGOTIATE WITH EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD ON ~HE ,INS:rALLA- !I
<br /> ilON OF W~TERLINES A~D APPROVE .CHANGE IN AMOUNT FOR INSTALLATION'Of
<br /> SPRINKLER SYSTEM 1~1THE TERMIN~l BUILDING. MOTION CARRIED.
<br /> .
<br /> 5 3. AMENDMENTS TO BASEMENT SPRINKLERING ORDINANCE - THE TERMS OF-THE PRESENT ORDI- ,
<br /> NANCE WERE REVIEWED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY WHO ALSO STATED THE CHANGES RECOMMENDED II
<br /> BY THE FIRE MARSHAL+S OFfiCE AND HIMSELf. MR.CHATT MOVED SECONDED BY'MR:CR~KE~ II e
<br /> TO ACCEPT THE AMENDMENTS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY ATTORN~Y.' ~OT10N CARRiEDi'
<br /> - ,
<br /> 6 4. PATTERSON-HILYARD WIDE~~NG ApPRAISAL'- THE CITY MANAGER READ A LETTER ATTACHED'
<br /> TO THE REPORT Of APPRAISAL SUBMITTED'BY MR. JAMES A. RODMAN WHO HAD BEEN ASKED
<br /> TO MAKE A SURV[y:'iOf THE PROPERT I ES ABU~T I NG HI L YARD AND PATTERSON STREETS WITH
<br /> RESPECT TO ANY BENEFITS ACCRUING'TO THE PROPERTIES ABUTTING THE' STREETS SINCE
<br /> THEY HAD BEEN WIDENED. IT WAS RECOMMENDED THE STAFf BRING THE FORMULA fOR THE
<br /> ASSESSMENTS ADOPTED FOR THE IMPROVEMENT Of THESE TWO STREETS-TO THE NEXT COM-
<br /> MITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING.
<br /> MR. CH~TT MOVED SECONDED BY MR. SWANSON THAT THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE APPROVED. MOTION I
<br /> CARRiED. ' .. I
<br /> '" i
<br /> COMMITTEE MEETING_HELD AUGUST 22, 1963: !
<br /> "PR'ESENT: MAYOR CONE;' COUNC'I LMEN CHATT, SWANSON, CHR I STENSEN, DEVERELL, CRAKES, i I
<br /> HAWK, AND PURCY; CITY MANAGER; ASST'- CI TY- MANAGER; ADM I N I STRATIVE I
<br /> I
<br /> ASSISTANT; CiTY ATTORNEY~'; ASST.CIT'( RECORDER; DIRECTOR Of PUBLIC- I
<br /> WORKS; TRAFFIC ENGINEER; AND OTHERS~ I
<br /> . j
<br /> 8/26/63 - 2 I
<br /> I e
<br /> ~ II
<br />
|