|
<br />r216
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />1/25/65 ,
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />. '
<br />
<br />Counc 11 Char.nber
<br />Eugene, Oregon
<br />January ?5, 1965
<br />
<br />The'meeting of the Common,Council of the City ~f :Eugene, Oregon, ~djourn~d from the
<br />regular meeting held January 11, t965, was called to order in the Councj.,1,<;:hamber at
<br />7: 30"p.m. on january 25, '1965, bY:l!is H(~)Oor May~r Edwin E. Cone with the following
<br />councilmen present: Mro ,Chatt, Mrs. 'La.uris, Messrs. Crakes, Purdy, Anderson,8J;ld
<br />Lassen. Messrs. Hawk and McNutt wer'e ~bsent.
<br />
<br />The'invocation was given by Rev. Fred Brooks of As~ury Methodist Churc~.:,
<br />
<br />Minutes of the meeting held January 11, 1965, as mailed to ~em.bers of the Council;:
<br />were approved.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />NEW BUSINESS
<br />
<br />1
<br />
<br />- . ,
<br />A tabulation of- bids was :presented as opened 'January 15, ,1965 for the -_purchase
<br />of a fire truck:
<br />
<br />Bidder
<br />Central Fire Truck
<br />Coast Apparatus
<br />Pirsch & Sons
<br />p. E. VanPelt
<br />Western States
<br />Western States
<br />Crown Coach Corporation
<br />Seagrave '
<br />Pirsch & Sons
<br />Mack Corporation'
<br />
<br />Amount
<br />$ 27,136.37
<br />,:27,152.:00
<br />28,230.00
<br />29,153.00
<br />30,352.57
<br />32,028.00
<br />32,311.78
<br />33,128.20
<br />34,424.00
<br />34,502.00
<br />
<br />Chassis
<br />International
<br />'International
<br />Ford C-850 '
<br />International
<br />International
<br />FWD-Ford
<br />Crown-Intnl
<br />Seagrave-Intnl
<br />Pirsch-Waukesha
<br />Mack Custom
<br />
<br />Remarks
<br />Ipcomplete, not in compliance
<br />:180' working days', -acceptable
<br />~80 days, not, id compliance
<br />180 days, acceptable
<br />300 days, acceptable
<br />300 days, acceptable
<br />180 days, ~cceptable
<br />290 days, acceptable
<br />365 days, acceptable
<br />150 working days; acceptable
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />The staff recommended purchase of the truck from Coast Apparatus on their second low-
<br />est bid, since the low bid submitted by Cen'tral Fire Truck was considered incomplete.
<br />Mr. Chatt moved seconded by Mrs. Lauris that the fire truck be purchased from Coast
<br />Apparatus on their bid price of $27,152.00. Rollcall vote. All councilmen preSal t
<br />voting.aye, motion carried.
<br />
<br />COMMITTEE REPORTS
<br />
<br />Gommitt.ee meeting hel~ January l4~ 1965:, '
<br />
<br />'~Preseni:: 'Mayor Cone; Couricilme~: Ch'att,. Crakes,,' H~wk, ~~rdy, ~nderson, and
<br />Lassen; 'city Manage:r:; Assist~nt C~ty Manager; City Attorney;. City
<br />Recorder; Director of Public Works; and others.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />2
<br />
<br />l. Variance. Exterior Wall Covering.266l Portland. 770 and 790 East 36th
<br />(Suess) - Robert Suess had submitted a written appeal to the Council on
<br />the Board of Appe.ats, denial o~ a ,variance ~o all()w use :of a gypsum board
<br />for ,exterior wall' F~vering on a. frame ?uilding. ~h~,sup~rinteqdeqt ~f
<br />building inspection 'reported on the qu'aliti.es C?f the pa'rticular gYP1'?~m .
<br />board used by Mr. Suess and the generally accepted uses of the board.
<br />Mr. Suess ,was ~r~~ent. and:sho~~d:asample o~ the ~yp~ ofqo~rd used 'Jor
<br />the outside covering of the three:buildings, in question,aJ;ld ~tat~d why
<br />he"'(had 'used it. ,On discussion by tti~ Cou,ncil, it'~a~' ~lj.gg~sted that
<br />th'isseason of ,the ,year would be: a~ inopp'ortunetime to rep~ace the
<br />covering according 'to the 'Code and that the materiaA co~ld be ~ested
<br />under adverse weather conditions for a further period of time. Mr.Hawk
<br />moved seconded by Mr. Crakes to table this item until July 15, 1965.
<br />Mot ion carried. .. ." _
<br />Mr. Chatt moved seconded by Mr~.Cfakes to appr~~e I~~m~~ of .the Committee r~p'ort; Mo-
<br />tion carried.--
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />3
<br />
<br />. ,
<br />2. Ordinance. Adoption 1964 Uniform Buiiding Code - T~e City Manager,dis-:
<br />tributed copies of the proposed revision of the building code ordinance
<br />for study by the Council members.
<br />
<br />No action was taken on Item 2 of the Committ~e 'report - proposed ordinance still being
<br />studied by Council members.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />4
<br />
<br />: 3. Widening Harlow Road - The Council members had toured the Harlow Road
<br />area and had reviewed a map showing location of properties where addi-
<br />1/25/65 - 1
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />~
<br />
|