Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4-7~ <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />2/14/66 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Chamber <br />Eugene, Oregon <br /> <br />February 14, 1966 <br /> <br />Regular meeting of the Common Council of the city of Eugene, Oregon was called to order at 7:30 p.m. <br />on February 14, 1966 in the Council Chanber by His Honor Mayor Edwin E. Cone with the following <br />councilmen present: Mr. Hawk, Mrs. Lauris, Messrs. Crakes, McNutt, Anderson, "and Lassen. Mr.Chatt <br />and Dr. Purdy were absent. <br /> <br />Minutes of the adjourned meeting held on January 24, 1966, as maired to members of the Council, were <br />approved. <br /> <br />NEW BUSINESS <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />Traffic Light, 13th and Agate - Mrs. Lauris reported that several east side residents had suggested <br />the installation of a traffic light at 13th and Agate, stating there had been several accidents since <br />the removal of the light. The City Manager stated he would make a report on the situation at a <br />later date. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />2 Crosswalk Signs - Councilman Lassen commented on the absence of crosswalk signs in the same area. <br />The Traffic Engineer stated that crosswalk signs are now being installed. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />Recognition, Glen Porter - Mayor Cone presented Glen Porter with a plaque and commended him on his <br />years of service with the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />4 Broadway, l-way eastbound Pearl to High, Hearing - Mr. Hearn, operator of the service station at <br />Pearl and Broadway, stated he was not aware that there is a serious traffic problem at that inter- <br />section. He said that in his opinion, the light at the corner of 10th and Pearl is a contributing <br />factor to the congestion at Broadway and Pearl. Mr. Hearn also stated that 50% of his business <br />comes from the east. Paul Lansdowne, manager of the Eugene Hotel, recommended the existing traffic <br />pattern be left until such time as the downtown redevelopment plan indicates the total traffic <br />pattern. The matter was tabled. <br /> <br />5 Bids, Aerial Platform FtreTruck, Opened January 3, 1966 - The following tabulation of bids was <br />presented: <br /> <br />Bidder <br />Crown Coach <br />L.A. ,Calif. <br /> <br />Chassis <br />COF 8190 <br />Intnl <br /> <br />Tower <br />Hght(l) <br />70' <br />75 'Working <br /> <br />Trnsmsn(2) <br />Ext . Hvy <br />T-224 <br /> <br />Axles(3) Tires(4) <br />Frnt-16000# Frnt 10x20 <br />Rear-34000# Michelin <br />Rear 10x20 <br />l2-ply <br /> <br />Meet <br />Specs(5) <br /> <br />Basic <br />Bid(6) <br /> <br />Yes <br /> <br />$ 57,979.12 <br /> <br />Tower Make - Pitman CPS-75-54 <br /> <br />Western States <br />Cornelius,Ore. <br /> <br />Tower Make <br /> <br />COF 8190 ?IS' <br />Intnl 80 'Working <br /> <br />- Hi-Ranger 10-75-S <br /> <br />Hvy <br />T-68 <br /> <br />Frnt-12000# <br />Rear- 300001i <br /> <br />9x20 Std <br />l2-ply <br /> <br />Yes <br /> <br />$ 58,443.74 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Hahn Motors <br />Hamburg,Pa. <br /> <br />Tower Make <br /> <br />COF 8190 7~' <br />lntnl 80 'working <br /> <br />- Trump Snorkel <br /> <br />NK <br /> <br />NK <br /> <br />NK <br /> <br />NK <br /> <br />$ 75,000.00 <br /> <br />(1) The Pitman tower has a platform to ground height of 70', while Hi-Ranger is 75'. Hi-Ranger has <br />10' more horizontal reach (48' to 38') due to its five additional feet inheight and its greater <br />maximum lower boom angle (950to 850). <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />(2) The Crown bid includes the extra heavy T-224 transmission which both bidders recommend. Western <br />States quoted the T-224 as an option at an additional cost of $265. <br /> <br />(3) Crown Coach has included extra heavy front and rear axles, while Western States contends their <br />basic bid includes "adequate" axles for their equipment. They, Western States, included the 34,000# <br />rear axles as an option at an additional cost of $332. To equal the Crown bid for a 16,000# front <br />axle, an additional $289.56 would be added. <br /> <br />(4) Tire size was not specifically specified. Crown Coach contends 10x20 with Michelin on the front <br />are required for their unit. Western States contends t'heir 9x20' s are "adequate", although it has <br />been determined Western's unit will weigh about 2500# more than the Crown unit. Tires to equal <br />Crown's bid would cost an estimated $179. <br /> <br />(5) Both bidders generally meet the broad specs prepared by the City, or have modified their bids to <br />indicate they would do so upon delivery. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />(6) Crown's basic bid includes items deemed n~cessary or highly desirable. To select the optional <br />equipment quoted by Western and also inst'all the heavie'r front axle and 10x20 tires, $1,065.56 would <br />have to be added to Western's bid, giving a ~otal of $59,509.30 against the Crown bid of $57,979.12, <br />or $1,530.18 more. <br /> <br />Mr. Hawk moved seconded by Mr.Crakes that the equipment be purchased from Crown Coach Corporation <br />on their bid price of $57,979.l2~ Rollcall vote. 'All councilmen present voting aye, motion <br />carried. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />2/14/66 - 1 <br /> <br />t.... <br /> <br />Ii <br />