Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />41 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />to that effect. He presented letters from the various engineers' organizations and copies of ordinances <br />from other cities which indicated no provision for a design team. <br /> <br />Carl Rhode, member of Lake Oswego Planning Commission and a professional engineer, described Lake <br />Oswego's experience with planned unit development and use of engineers and non-professional people <br />as co-ordinators. <br /> <br />Mr. McNutt moved seconded by Dr. Purdy that the paragraph immediately following Section 18.05(c) be <br />changed to read: "One of the professional consultants chosen by the applicant from either (a), (b), or <br />(c) above shall be designated to be responsible for conferring with the planning staff with respect to <br />the concept and details of the plan." <br /> <br />Mr. Frank Bonson, designer, said this section is more restrictive than State laws and that other very <br />well qualified people besides engineers are being left out. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Marx said the Horne Builders, Designers, Board of Realtors, Rental Properties Association, Resi- <br />dential Appraisers, Associated General Contractors all oppose the section as it is now written, and <br />are in favor of deletion of the requirement for a design team. <br /> <br />Don Smith, architect, said the requirements for a design team better serves the community since it <br />assures better neighborhoods, and the Planning Director said the planned unit development concept is <br />for tracts of land of sufficient size to allow comprehensive planning which would require the services <br />of the professional people provided for in the design team. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />A vote was taken on the motion as stated, and motion carried, Mr. McDonald voting no. <br /> <br />During the discussion, Ron Schmaedick referred to Section 18.10, Dedication and Maintenance of Facili- <br />ties in Planned Unit Development, and said use of the words "public use" might invite the general <br />public into areas meant for use of those living in a development. Mrs. Niven recommended the wording <br />in the last line of the first paragraph under Section 18.10 be changed to read "...set aside, improved, <br />conveyed, or dedicated for the following ~:" instead of "...pub1ic use:" No action was taken. <br /> <br />Mrs. ~auris moved seconded by Mr. Wingard that the hearing be continued to Monday, <br />February 12,1968. Motion carried, Dr. Purdy voting no. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Upon motion duly made, seconded, and carried, the meeting was adjourned to Monday, <br />February 5,1968. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />---VA <br /> <br />/ ~h McKinley <br />City Manager <br /> <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />1/29/68 - 2 <br /> <br />~ <br />