|
<br />r
<br />
<br />(\~f)n
<br />J ~ V It,}
<br />
<br />6/9/69
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />Items 1, 2 and 3, recommended award of alternate bid to low bidder; Item 4 recommend award of
<br />alternate bid to low bidder, subject to discussion; Items 6 and 7, award to low bidder; Item 8
<br />recommended award of alternate bid to low bidder, subject to acceptance of bid by subdivider wi:thin
<br />two weeks. Item 9, award of project to low bidder, subject to filing of plat, with -authority to reject I
<br />bid if plat not filed by June 11, 196'9; Item 10-, recommended award to' low bidder, subject to contract- ji
<br />ual agreement between two property owners on how assessment will be figured; Items 11 and 12, award I,
<br />. '. 11
<br />of project to low bidder; Item 13, rejection of bid; Item 14, award of bid to low bidder; Item 15 Ii
<br />recommended hold~ng bid over to next 'regular rrieetin-g, letter on file declaring bidder made error in I,
<br />bid; Items 16, 17 and 18 recommended award of project to low bidder. II
<br />II
<br />I'
<br />I
<br />I,
<br />Ii
<br />
<br />I
<br />!
<br />,
<br />i
<br />I
<br />[I
<br />II
<br />i
<br />I
<br />i
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />II
<br />II
<br />!I
<br />
<br />'I
<br />I'
<br />"
<br />
<br />I
<br />:
<br />I
<br />i
<br />II
<br />ri
<br />il
<br />,I
<br />!:
<br />"
<br />ii
<br />II
<br />I
<br />,I
<br />I:
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />II
<br />"
<br />'i
<br />Ii
<br />,I
<br />I,
<br />II
<br />I'
<br />,I
<br />II
<br />'I
<br />I,
<br />II
<br />II
<br />'I
<br />
<br />Ii
<br />;1
<br />Ii
<br />
<br />fr.om
<br />
<br />11.
<br />
<br />Reconstruction on Walnut
<br />15th to 17th
<br />Crest Construction Co.
<br />McKenzie Road & Driveway
<br />Cushing Bros., Inc.
<br />Wildish Co~ruction Co.
<br />
<br />':n
<br />
<br />$
<br />
<br />9,868.90
<br />9,975.30
<br />10,680.00
<br />12,189.00
<br />
<br />{/ 12.
<br />
<br />Floral Hill Drive Area
<br />1. Wildish Construction
<br />Crest Const. Co.
<br />McKenzie Road & Driveway
<br />
<br />Co.
<br />
<br />12,421. 50
<br />13,450.38
<br />16,961. 87
<br />
<br />13.
<br />
<br />Bertelsen Road from Coos Bay
<br />Branch Southern Pac. Trks
<br />to 5th Avenue
<br />Wi1dish Construction Co.
<br />McKenzie Road & Driveway
<br />
<br />37,491,50
<br />44,049.25
<br />
<br />r/14.
<br />
<br />Trunk Line in Alfred's Plat
<br />& Jessen Drive
<br />Salem Sand & Gravel Co.
<br />Wi1dish Construction Co.
<br />
<br />76,778.30
<br />93,278.30
<br />
<br />1:
<br />I'
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />II
<br />II
<br />II
<br />.,
<br />'1
<br />
<br />15.
<br />
<br />Lateral lines in ~lfred's Plat
<br />and Jessen Drive
<br />Cushing Bros., Inc.
<br />Salem Sand & Gravel Co.
<br />Wildish Const. Company
<br />
<br />130,516.00
<br />204,22.4.70
<br />262,305.72
<br />
<br />!I
<br />
<br />'I
<br />
<br />11
<br />ii
<br />II
<br />I
<br />,I
<br />
<br />16.
<br />
<br />23rd Ave from Amazon Creek to
<br />McMillan
<br />Cushing Bros, Inc.
<br />McKenzie Road & Driveway
<br />Windish Construction Co.
<br />
<br />19,460.50
<br />24,514.55
<br />26,605.38
<br />
<br />I'
<br />
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />
<br />Friendiy Street from Amazon
<br />Creek to 20th
<br />Cushing Bros., Inc.
<br />Wildish Const. Co.
<br />McKenzie Road & Driveway
<br />Salem Sand & Gravel C0.
<br />
<br />46,772.80
<br />56,795.90
<br />57,792.81
<br />58,699.57
<br />
<br />17,
<br />
<br />"
<br />"
<br />I'
<br />iI
<br />i
<br />"
<br />I'
<br />!
<br />"
<br />
<br />i.
<br />11
<br />
<br />ALLEY PAVING
<br />V 18. Btn Portland and Wi11amette
<br />from 26th to 27th
<br />R,C. Parsons & Son, Inc,
<br />Fred Stubbert
<br />
<br />5,539.86
<br />6,429.86~'d:
<br />
<br />** Incomplete Bid
<br />
<br />Amt.
<br />Budgete?
<br />
<br />o
<br />
<br />$ 9,868.90
<br />
<br />$18,100.00
<br />
<br />Completion Date 10-1-69
<br />
<br />Lat
<br />Serv
<br />Levy
<br />
<br />$ 0.097/sq.ft
<br />64 . 69/ each (12 )
<br />0.005/sq.ft
<br />Completion
<br />
<br />Da te.: ~9-1-69
<br />
<br />Lat
<br />Serv
<br />Levy
<br />
<br />0.04/sq.ft 23,840.00
<br />398.91/each (4)
<br />0.005/sq:ft
<br />Completion
<br />
<br />Date:
<br />
<br />10-1-69
<br />
<br />(san)4, 600.00
<br />
<br />(Combined w/1ater1s
<br />@8" equivalent)
<br />
<br />Completion Date: 1-1-70
<br />
<br />Lat
<br />Serv
<br />Levy
<br />
<br />0.044/sqft 56,024.30
<br />199. 13/each
<br />0.005/sqft
<br />Completion Date:
<br />
<br />1-1-70
<br />
<br />56,000.00
<br />
<br />19,460.50
<br />
<br />18,200.00
<br />
<br />Completion Date:
<br />
<br />10-1-69
<br />
<br />46,772.80
<br />
<br />59,100.00
<br />
<br />Completion Date: 10-1~69
<br />
<br />12' Conc. Pav.
<br />20' Conc. Pav.
<br />
<br />5.99/fr.ft
<br />9.98/fr.ft
<br />Completion
<br />
<br />Date: 10-1-69
<br />
<br />Mr. McDonald moved seconded by Dr. Purdy to accept the recommendations of Department of Public Works
<br />on Projects 1 through 18 with the exception of Nos. 8, 9, 13 and 15, which will be taken up indiv-
<br />idua 11y.
<br />
<br />Mr. Alan Curtis, 2370 Douglas Drive, protested paving of Douglas Drive on the basis of cost of the
<br />project, which he fe1t-~was too high. He felt that Mr. Wi1dish should have been excluded from bidding
<br />on this project, since-.he is an owner of over 50% of the property. In answer to his 'question, the
<br />City Manager said, there is no legal obligation 'to~obtain 100% of signatures on a petition, but
<br />generally speaking, the Council requests 50% of the owners. Mr. Curtis presented a petition protest-
<br />ing this project, signed by Mr. and Mrs. Marvin' Girardeau, 2398 Douglas Drive, Mr, and Mrs. Harley
<br />Coxen, 2380 McLean Boulevard and Mr. and Mrs. Curtis. Dr. Slocum had protested paving and sewer,
<br />saying the property boundary could not be accurately determined. Department of Public Works has
<br />checked into these claims and feels they are not justified.
<br />
<br />:'1
<br />"
<br />j;
<br />'I
<br />"
<br />il
<br />
<br />Mr. Marvin Girardeau agreed with Mr. Curtis' statements, and was concernee:about the high price of
<br />this project. In answer to Mr. Girardeau's concern over low bidder, Mr. Allen explained that a low
<br />lid could not be disallowed on a city project, just because the, bidder was a property owner. He also
<br />explained that the street would not terminate in a cuI de sac, but would be terminated with a guard
<br />6/9/69 - 2
<br />
<br />~.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />II
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />,
<br />,
<br />I
<br />
<br />e,
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />,I
<br />11
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />:1
<br />II
<br />I'
<br />Ii
<br />I:
<br />Ii
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />Ii
<br />I:
<br />II
<br />I!
<br />Ii
<br />"
<br />,r
<br />['
<br />II
<br />:1
<br />II
<br />I,
<br />II
<br />I!
<br />"
<br />II
<br />II
<br />II
<br />I'
<br />
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />,I
<br />II
<br />I:
<br />I'
<br />d
<br />I,
<br />
<br />I:
<br />Ii
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
|