|
<br /> "..--
<br /> 006 F"
<br /> hJ 'v e-
<br /> 7/28/69
<br /> I I
<br /> I milk inspection program and also expressed concern about their freedom of choice. I
<br /> :, Mr. John Barker, 1177 Washington, also testified that he would favor ending the City's
<br /> II inspecti~n. program.
<br /> (I _.
<br /> -
<br /> II Mayor Anderson closed the. hearing and opened discussion to Council members. Mrs. Hayward
<br /> II
<br /> II said she felt it might be well to postpone action since there are legal questions' involved.
<br /> II
<br /> 'I The Mayor commented that the only oblig~tion of the Council was to conduct a public hearing
<br /> I! which has been done. Councilman Mohr asked for clarification since it appears the Counci-l
<br /> 'I
<br /> " is neither changing nor amending the ordinance. The Mayor replied that the ordinance is !i
<br /> 'I
<br /> I:
<br /> " still in effect, but that funds have not been allQcated to provide for milk inspection or.
<br /> :1
<br /> ,I enforcement. The City Attorney commented that if funds are not appropriated, eventually II
<br /> " I!
<br /> I' help will be laid off and the program will cease. At .that time the Council will have to
<br /> I: II
<br /> I: repeal the ordinance~ The Mayor said the City still has an ordinance to enforce, and I:
<br /> " the Council is charging the City Manager with responsibility for enforcing. that ordinance.
<br /> )1 II
<br /> "
<br /> "
<br /> " il
<br /> I: It was agreed the item would be brought back for discussion a~ the August 11, 1969 Council
<br /> il e
<br /> " I
<br /> I: meeting, at which time the City Attorney would have answers for the questions raised at Ii
<br /> , Ii
<br /> il this meeting.
<br /> !,
<br /> I, .. i
<br /> ;1 Appeal, Amortization, Daniel Hotel Supply, 2470 Chambers Street I
<br /> I
<br /> ii The Public Works Director read a letter from Mr. William J. Daniel requesting appeal ,i
<br /> " from the Planning Commission's decision regarding conditions of IS-year amortization II
<br /> !j of hotel supply business at 2470 ,Chambers Street. The Planning Director said that at Ii
<br /> II the June 3, 1969 Planning Commission was the first time a hearing has been held on this II I
<br /> II 'I
<br /> type request since approval of the new Zoning Ordinance. - "
<br /> II "
<br /> II
<br /> ii 11
<br /> " Councilman Mohr asked Mr. Daniel if he had received and looked at thecomp'1ete re'cord Il
<br /> 'I II
<br /> ;: of the Planning Commission's action to determine whether facts were correct. Mr. Daniel
<br /> " :1
<br /> 11 replies he had received no recent report of the Planning Commission findings and no
<br /> " ii
<br /> I recent report of what is to be done. Mayor Anderson suggested the item be postponed
<br /> I, I,
<br /> " until Mr. Daniel has an opportunity to review the record. The Planning Director said jl
<br /> il
<br /> ;i there was nothing in the Planni~g Commission report that Mr. Daniel was not aware of, Ii
<br /> " I'
<br /> , ,I
<br /> " that Mr. Daniel himself suggested the amortization period to the Commission and staff, Ii
<br /> " :1
<br /> , and that material submitted to the Council at this time has been before Mr. Daniel either
<br /> ;, ii
<br /> !!
<br /> Ii at the public hearing or at one of the staff meetings. Ii
<br /> :1 'I
<br /> .. II
<br /> " Mayor Anderson asked the staff to schedule another meeting on this item to allow Mr.Daniel
<br /> " ,I
<br /> " opportunity to review the Commission report. il
<br /> ,.
<br /> ,
<br /> /COMMITTEE REPORTS Ii
<br /> ,I II
<br /> " Committee meeting held July 16, 1969: I!
<br /> "
<br /> , I,
<br /> ,
<br /> " "Present: Mayor Anderson; Councilmen Hayward, Purdy, McDonald, Bea 1, and Mohr; City 11
<br /> 1)
<br /> '! Manager and staff; and others. (I
<br /> 'I
<br /> " II
<br /> I.; Budget Election Mayor Anderson expressed pleasure at the outcome of the election, I,
<br /> II I
<br /> .,
<br /> and thanked Council and Budget Committee members and City employes for the time and ,
<br /> ~ I
<br /> effort put forth for its passage'. "
<br /> i'
<br /> . I!
<br /> Manager requested that Council arrange a special meeting to canvass vote, adopt il
<br /> Proclamation, and certify levy to County Assessor. Council set 11:45 a.m., . i'
<br /> July 1:-7, 1969, for special meeting. 11
<br /> ,I
<br /> " I'
<br /> "
<br /> Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that Item 1 of the Committee report be received and filed. ii
<br /> Motion carried. ,I e
<br /> "
<br /> I I,
<br /> ii
<br /> '. -2. Laundry Facilities for Low-Income People - Councilman Mohr previously distributed to ,I
<br /> Ii
<br /> Council members a proposal submitted by Lane Human Resources for establishment of I'
<br /> il
<br /> laundry facilities for low- income people. II
<br /> .,
<br /> explained that they are requesting two things !,
<br /> Mr. Hal Covey, business manager of LHR, Ii
<br /> "
<br /> of the City in connection with a laundromat for low-income people. Mr. Ray Eaglin 'I
<br /> explained that they are not asking for funding, but for land sites, which the City II
<br /> would retain in ownership. In answer to Councilwoman Hayward, he said they did not I!
<br /> i'
<br /> have a particular site in mind. If the City could not comply with this request, il
<br /> they asked the Council to simply endorse the plan. In answer to Mrs. Beal, Mr. Eaglin I,
<br /> ;1 II '
<br /> " said they would set up schedules to transport pwople to the laundry' facility. Counci I- ii
<br /> :1 man Purdy a'sked how they would determine eligible persons, to which Mr. Eaglin replied I'
<br /> that they had files on many persons, which could be supplemented by welfare lists. Ii
<br /> In answer to Mayor Anderson, Mr. Eaglin said materials would be solicited from County, I
<br /> State, and local authorities. Constru~tion would be sought-on a volunteer basis If
<br /> (in-kind grants, college and university ai?, high schools, VISTA, community action,
<br /> labor unions, churches) . Ii
<br /> :, Mrs. Bet~y Niven explained that there are many people, especially elderly, who have Ii
<br /> ,; Ii
<br /> very low incomes, but are not on welfare. Ii
<br /> "
<br /> ,
<br /> In answer to Mayor Anderson, Mr. Eaglin said that if there were any preEerence for /:
<br /> ii
<br /> " location of facility, it would be Bethel-Danebo area. Manager said Planning Depart- II e
<br /> ment could take inventory of City-owned property and study possible sites-. II
<br /> I ~
<br /> "
<br /> l': <. 7/28/69 '"' 2. " i'
<br /> -.
<br />
|