Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />"Ill <br /> <br />130 <br /> <br />6/1/70 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />.....- <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The City Manager clarified the staff position regarding the compromise proposal. The staff felt <br />that the NEC Code should be adopted with state amendments and without the local amendments. If the <br />Council decides to adopt the local amendments, the staff would prefer the proposed compromise as to <br />the original proposal submitted by'the committee. <br /> <br />Dr. Purdy asked whether the proposed compromise was acceptable to the electrical committee. <br />Mr. Mitchem said they would be willing to accept these three. <br /> <br />II <br />II <br />Ii <br />II <br />II <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />After further discussion about the local codes and the NEC with state amendments, Mr. Teague said <br />that if he were to make a motion it would be to adopt the NEC plus the mandatory state additions, <br />plus the local amendments pertaining primarily to safety. This will be worked out by staff with <br />the local code committee. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />II <br />-II <br />I <br />,I <br />I <br />II <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ii <br />,I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mrs. Hayward said that one of the principle questions at issue was what was involved with safety <br />and what was involved with expansion. <br /> <br />Mr. Lassen said that there was a difference of op~n~on between the staff and the codes committee, <br />and pointed out that there was also a difference of opinion in the National Electrical ~eoBtractors <br />Association and the statement from the local National Electrical Contractors Association. The staff <br />has not been able to remncile its differences with the codes committee and the Council will finally <br />have to decide what is necessary for safety or for expansion. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />I <br />II <br />II <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Ii <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />II <br /> <br />!I <br />'I <br />I, <br />'I <br />Ii <br />II <br />" <br />I: <br />I' <br />II <br />!I <br />il <br />it <br />I' <br />,I <br />II <br /> <br />Ii <br />I' <br />II <br />i! <br />'I <br />'I <br />11 <br />II <br />II <br />I, <br /> <br />il <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Mrs. Hayward said that she was not ready to make a decision at this time, and felt that the hearing <br />should be closed, and that the Council should consider the testimony. <br /> <br />Councilman McDonald agreed, but felt a deadline for the decision should be set. <br /> <br />Dr. Purdy moved seconded by Mrs. Hayward to place this item on the next regular Council agenda. <br /> <br />There was Council discussion whether they were prepared to make a decision or should wait until the <br />next meeting.. <br /> <br />The City Manager agreed with Mrs. Hayward that if the Council accepted the Committee proposal that <br />they would have, to develop a set of ~~~al amen?~ents w?ich th~y felt would ~e desirable. <br />- -':" .... . .:. - <br />~ ~... .'-. <br /> <br />In a~s~ertocMr~ McDonald; the City Manager said that the City is not automatically under the NEC, <br />but had adopted it by reference. <br /> <br />Question called, on motion. Motion carried. <br /> <br />ORDINANCES <br /> <br />Council Bill No. 9193 Authorizing the City Manager to make traffic decisions in the Mall <br />area was submitted and read in full. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I: <br />II <br />II <br />,I <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Dr. Purdy that the bill be read the second time by council bill number <br />only, with unanimous consent of the Council. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the <br />second time by council bill number only. <br /> <br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Dr. Purdy that the rules be suspended and the bill read the third time <br />by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council. Motion carried unanimously and <br />the bill was read the third time by council bill number only. <br /> <br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Dr. Purdy that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall' <br />vote. All councilmen present voting ay.e, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16000. <br /> <br />Council Bill No. 9194 - Designating June 25, 1970, for a special, budget election was submitted <br />and read in full. <br /> <br />Mr. Teague moved se~onded by Dr. Purdy that the bill be read the second time by council bill number <br />only, with unanimous consent of the Council. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the <br />second time by council bill number only. <br /> <br />I <br />i <br />II <br />Ii <br />Ii <br /> <br />" <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />'I <br />II <br />II <br />'I <br />II <br />II <br />II <br /> <br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Dr. Purdy that the rules be suspended and the bill read the third time <br />by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council. Motion carried unanimously and <br />the bill was read the third time by council bill number only. <br /> <br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Dr. Purdy that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall <br />vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16001. <br /> <br />RESOLUTIONS <br /> <br />i <br />, <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />,I <br />I, <br />Ii <br /> <br />Ii <br />I <br />I, <br />I <br /> <br />ResellitionNo. 1826 - Submitting measure for additional tax levy at election, June 25, 1970, <br />was submitted and read in full. <br /> <br />Mr. Teague moved secondEld by Dr. Purdy that the resolution be adopted. <br /> <br />'Mrs. Betty Niven said the city did not have much choice at this time, but that the alternative of <br />some form of city income tax should be considered. She felt the Council should be able to reassure <br />people that they are only asking for an increase at this time, but would be back with an alternative. <br /> <br />Vote taken on motion as stated. Motion carried. <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />Ii <br /> <br />6/1/70 - 3 <br /> <br />...... <br />