Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Deb Frisch <br />, Eugene, referred to the council’s work session to discuss the City’s response to the Lane County <br />budget crisis and displayed a document from the County’s budget that she said identified funding recommenda- <br />tions for 48 different services. She pointed out that three programs were recommended for funding above the <br />minimum: prosecution of adult defendants, the jail and prosecution of juvenile defendants. She said if the City <br />contracted with the County to prosecute property crimes in Eugene that was an invitation to criminals to harass <br />those who lived in Springfield and the County. She said the council had still not met on the subject of the <br />University of Oregon’s proposed basketball arena. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy determined there was no one else wishing to speak and closed the public forum. She called for <br />comments from the council. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman asked for a copy of the Lane County Budget document. <br /> <br /> <br />2. CONSENT CALENDAR <br />A. Approval of City Council Minutes of the February 19, 2008, Public Hearing; February 27, <br /> <br />2008, Work Session; April 9, 2008, Work Session and May 5, 2008, Executive Session <br /> B. Approval of Tentative Working Agenda <br /> C. Approval of Minutes, Findings and Recommendations from the Hearings Official and <br />Adoption of Resolution 4941 for Concrete Alley Paving, and Constructing Wastewater and <br />th <br />Stormwater Systems on 6 Alley between Taylor Street and Polk Street (Job #4527) <br /> D. Approval of Neighborhood Matching Grants <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor, seconded by Ms. Bettman, moved to approve the items on the Consent Cal- <br />endar. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman noted that she had submitted electronic minutes corrections and pulled Item C from the Consent <br />Calendar. <br /> <br />The motion passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman stated she was not opposed to the local improvement district; her concern was with the <br />assessment policies and assuring that all legally assessable costs were assessed. Her motion would increase the <br />assessment by $14,016 of stormwater improvements. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to amend Section 5 of Reso- <br />lution No. 4941 to change $109,620 to $123,636. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman said her intent was to correct shifting part of the assessment cost to the City. She said the <br />properties were mostly commercial and would benefit from the improvement and therefore all of the costs that <br />were legally assessable to the impacted and benefitting properties should be allocated to those properties. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor asked why one property had been exempted from the assessment. City Engineer Mark <br />Schoening explained that the property was not included because it did not front the alley. Councilor Taylor said <br />there had been other cases when properties had to pay. Mr. Schoening said there were no instances that <br />involved transportation improvements. City Attorney Glenn Klein said the code differentiated among alley, <br />street and other types of assessments; the code was specific that for alley assessments the property had to abut <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council May 12, 2008 Page 2 <br /> Public Hearing <br /> <br />