Laserfiche WebLink
M I N U T E S <br /> <br /> <br />Eugene City Council <br />Work Session <br />McNutt Room – City Hall <br />777 Pearl Street—Eugene, Oregon <br /> <br /> May 14, 2008 <br /> Noon <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Chris Pryor, Bonny Bettman, Andrea Ortiz, Mike Clark, Betty Taylor. <br /> <br />COUNCILORS ABSENT: George Poling, Jennifer Solomon, Alan Zelenka. <br /> <br /> <br />Her Honor Mayor Kitty Piercy called the meeting of the Eugene City Council to order. <br /> <br />City Manager Jon Ruiz distributed a news release from Arlie and Company regarding potential sites for the <br />McKenzie-Willamette Hospital. He said staff was still pursuing the council’s direction to site a hospital <br />south of the river. <br /> <br />A. WORK SESSION: Water Quality Protected Waterways <br /> <br />Therese Walch, Public Works, said the intent of the proposal was to protect, rather than enhance, water <br />quality by filling gaps in a system of waterways identified as important to water quality. She said policy <br />and regulatory drivers for the proposal were the Metro Plan, the Comprehensive Stormwater Management <br />Plan (CSWMP) and the Clean Water Act and the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). <br />She illustrated on a map Eugene’s position in the watershed and the waterways that DEQ had determined <br />were not meeting water quality standards. She said Eugene was subject to a total maximum daily load <br />(TMDL) and pollutant load reduction. <br /> <br />Ms. Walch said the identification of waterways to protect was based on a watershed approach, beginning <br />with the waterways identified by DEQ and adding waterways that directly drained into them and headwater <br />streams because of their particularly sensitivity. She said those waterways were then compared to <br />waterways that were already protected and protection gaps were identified; the proposed overlay zone would <br />fill those gaps. She illustrated the overlay zone on a map and pointed out that the concrete-lined channel of <br />Amazon Creek was not included because it did not meet the fundamental criteria of having a water quality <br />function, meaning an earthen bottom and vegetative slide slopes. She said the proposal included two sets of <br />tax lots outside City limits but inside the urban growth boundary (UGB); protection would apply upon <br />annexation to the City. <br /> <br />Ms. Walch explained that the basic elements of the proposal included a water quality management area <br />comprised of the waterway channel plus a 25-foot setback from the top of the bank on either side for non- <br />headwater streams and a 40-foot setback measured from the center of the channel for headwater streams. <br />She said the widths were consistent with Goal 5 setbacks. She said the intent was to prevent future <br />additional encroachment into the protected area, and to protect existing vegetation and minimize piping and <br />other disturbance. She said Planning Commission members who voted in opposition to the proposal <br />questioned its overall benefit and wanted to expand catch basin cleaning and restoration projects to achieve <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council May 14, 2008 Page 1 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />