|
<br />591
<br />
<br />-
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />11
<br />II
<br />I
<br />
<br />Council
<br />Eugene,
<br />May 24,
<br />
<br />Chamber
<br />Oregon
<br />1971
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />"
<br />
<br />Adjourned meeting of the Common Council of the city of Eugene, Oregon was called to order by His
<br />Mayor Lester E. Anderson at 7:30 p.m. on May 24, 1971 in the Council Chamber, with the following
<br />Councilmen present: Messrs. Teague, Mohr, McDonald, Mrs. Beal and Mrs.: Campbell, 'Messrs.' Gribskov,
<br />Williams and Hershner.
<br />
<br />I.
<br />
<br />Proclamation, Results of Election of May 20, 1971 - City Manager read the pro.clamation setting
<br />forTh 'the voting by precincts and the results of the election. There was no one in the audience
<br />who wished to discuss this matter.
<br />
<br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr to approve the proclamation as read.
<br />
<br />Motion carried.
<br />
<br />Councilman Mohr read a Resolution suggested by him whi~h recommended authorization of appointment
<br />of a, special commission to carry the text of the results of the ele,ct,ion on Measure 52, "Advisory
<br />vote on Southeast Asia war withdrawal," to Washington, D. C. Mr. Mohr felt this would be a good
<br />mechanism for dealing with the results of the election.
<br />
<br />I'
<br />Ii
<br />jl
<br />II
<br />
<br />, II
<br />Counciltri~~)McDonald expressed a desire to have time to consider this suggestion, since the Council III
<br />had not been aware of it until now. , I
<br />:'
<br />Mayor Anderson felt the Council should decide on the direction it wants to take,. and should have 11
<br />time to make this determination., Councilmen Teague and Beal agreed. ii
<br />:i
<br />
<br />Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Campbell that the Council ado.pt the resolution outlined above.
<br />
<br />Councilman Mohr said he would be willing to hold over discussion on the resolutimuntil the
<br />committee meeting.
<br />
<br />Mayor Anderson suggested that, in the meantime, Mr. Mohr could consult with other members of
<br />the Council for their ideas.
<br />
<br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. McDonald to table the motion for further consideration. Motion
<br />carried.
<br />
<br />II. Appoiritment -' Mayo.r Anderson announced the appointment of universi~y student Robert L. Edwards
<br />to the Human Rights Commission for a term expiring January 1, 1974.
<br />
<br />III.
<br />
<br />Public Hearings
<br />A. BUaget Hearing, 1971-72 - This time was advertised for public hearing pn the entire budget,
<br />not just the amount outside the 6% limitation. Copies of the budget are available in the
<br />Finance Department for interested persons.
<br />
<br />There w.as no discussion on this matter, and no action taken.
<br />
<br />ii
<br />II
<br />I,
<br />I'
<br />,I
<br />II
<br />:'
<br />,
<br />"
<br />"
<br />ii
<br />"
<br />:i
<br />[I
<br />Ii
<br />
<br />Manager. requested
<br />suggested May 27.
<br />All others agreed
<br />
<br />Councilmen to set a date for the ne~t budget committee meeting. He
<br />Messrs. Hershner and Gribskov indicated that they could not be present.
<br />to this time.
<br />
<br />Councilman Mohr questioned the precedent for calling back the entire budget committee.
<br />Manager agreed that legally, the Counci~ cou~d make cuts itself, but that it had been an
<br />established policy to include lay members in this process. Mr. Mohr agreed that this was
<br />good, but had simply been interested.
<br />
<br />B. Phase II, ,Danebo Neighborhood Development Plan:'- (Minutes of Committee meeting of May 12,
<br />1971) - Theron Rust of the Eugene Renewal Agency explained requirements of the Department
<br />of HUD provide that each NDP Urban Renewal Plan must be adopted for each project before a
<br />contract may be issued for assistance. The renewal plan for the second phase remains
<br />identical to that adopted the past year. A public hearing must be called for opinions
<br />for or against the project.
<br />
<br />Mr. Rust outlined objectives of the plan and answered questions asked by Councilmen. He
<br />explained that the citizens committee which was formed before renewal began is still active
<br />and approved this application.
<br />
<br />Resolution No. 1929 - Approving urban renewal plan and feasibility of relocation for
<br />neighborhood development of the Danebo Neighborhood Program (ORE A-4)
<br />was submitted. (At the public hearing of May 24.)
<br />
<br />Mr. Teague move.d seconded by Mr. Mohr that the resolution be adopted
<br />
<br />Mr. Theron Rust of the Eugene Renewal Agency explained the nece2sity for a public hearing
<br />on the Danebo Plan and that it was identical with that adopted a' year ago. He outlined
<br />accomplishments of the last year and pointed out that nine par~~ls had been acquired for
<br />park development.
<br />
<br />'11\
<br />
<br />Councilman McDonald asked who had purchased the property for park development and was
<br />informed that this had been donated by the Renewal Agency. It was pointed out that
<br />
<br />t~~ budget appropriation was for development of parks.
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />5/24/71 - I
<br />
<br />I
<br />11
<br />
<br />I'
<br />I ~
<br />~ I
<br />,.
<br />Honor II
<br />'I
<br />,
<br />\1
<br />,I
<br />:f
<br />I,
<br /><I
<br />;1
<br />I'
<br />"
<br />:i
<br />"
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />I'
<br />,I
<br />Ii
<br />i:
<br />I
<br />I;
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />:,
<br />
<br />ii
<br />
<br />I'
<br />
<br />:1
<br />II
<br />;1
<br />I,
<br />I
<br />II
<br />II
<br />
<br />!I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />'I
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />'I
<br />I'
<br />[I
<br />ii
<br />II
<br />"
<br />I'
<br />II
<br />,I
<br />"
<br />'i
<br />II
<br />I
<br />il
<br />Ii
<br />;1
<br />:i
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />ii
<br />
<br />II
<br />:j
<br />Ii
<br />"
<br />iI
<br />I
<br />II
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />i'
<br />:!
<br />I'
<br />,I
<br />'[
<br />I,
<br />"
<br />;1
<br />
<br />e
<br />
|