Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> III""" <br /> 73 7 e <br /> 11/22/71 <br /> I II <br /> I I <br /> of the project should be postponed until all information is available on the proposed II <br /> ii project. [I <br /> i 1\ <br /> ,I <br /> " I <br /> I " <br /> ! Mrs. Beal expressed Council appreciation to Mr. Pearson, Planning Commission president, i <br /> i; 'i <br /> who was present at the meeting, and to the entire Commission for the excellent 'I <br /> I: " <br /> d work in their pililic hearings. Mayor Anderson agreed with her, and said these ': <br /> :; <br /> " :1 <br /> I! sentiments were shared by the entire Council. q <br /> I' <br /> " <br /> II <br /> I Mrs. Campbell expressed inTerest in continuing the hearing, since there were people <br /> I: <br /> ii in the audience who had come for this express purpose. Mayor Anderson explained <br /> I, the Planning Commission recommendation for postponement, and that it was felt any <br /> ,\ hearing at this time might be redundant. <br /> 11 <br /> I: <br /> Ii Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr to adopt the Planning Commission recommendation <br /> .' <br /> 'I that action on the agreement for Highway 126 (Roosevelt Freeway) be postponed. This :1 <br /> II <br /> Ii recommendation for postponement is the result of unanswered questions which were ': <br /> 1\ raised at the Commission's two public hearings on November 16 and 18. This postpone- e <br /> ment was further supported by a recommendation by the City Manager that a decision " <br /> :i 'I <br /> regarding this contract be delayed by both the Commission and the City Council until <br /> an Environmental Impact Study has been submitted for their review. <br /> Mrs. Beal was impressed with the amount of work the Planning Commission had put into <br /> its recommendation and suggested the Council adopt the entire recommendation, includ- <br /> ing items 1, 2 and 3. She asked to amend the motion to include these portions. I <br /> Mayor Anderson suggested Mr. Teague's motion be voted upon, and then Mrs. Beal <br /> cguld make this as another motion. She withdrew her amendment. <br /> Mrs. Campbell was concerned that there were councilmen who had not attended the <br /> Planning Commission public hearings, and that this public hearing should continue,: <br /> Mayor Anderson said if this ~otion passed, public hearings would be postponed until <br /> further information was available through an environmental impact study. Comments <br /> Ii would be redundant, since much of the information was on record through the Planning <br /> II Commission hearings. <br /> Ii <br /> I. <br /> I' <br /> \! <br /> I' Mrs. Campbell suggested that Councilmen who had not attended the hearings listen <br /> jl <br /> I' to the tapes of the proceedings. Mayor Anderson said there would be a written <br /> " <br /> " <br /> II <br /> ,I record of the meetings. <br /> ., <br /> " <br /> : <br /> il <br /> i: Vote taken on motion as stated. Motion carried. 'I <br /> it I <br /> /! Mrs. Beal moved the City Council adopt recommendatias 1, 2 and 3 of the Planning <br /> I Commission report on the Hwy 126 contract. Motion died for lack of a second. <br /> I, <br /> I' <br /> I' <br /> II <br /> ji Councilman Mohr commented that his reason for not seconding Mrs. Beal's motion was <br /> Ii that he intends, at the Wednesday committee meeting, to prepare for Council review <br /> I: a program which may accomplish many of the recommendations, but in a different form. <br /> I' <br /> " He could see the Planning Commission recommendations were well thought out, and he I <br /> Ii would like to develop a slightly different form of procedure for Council consideration. <br /> " <br /> , <br /> Ii Mayor Anderson again commended the Planning Commission for its hearings, and said <br /> Ii <br /> much of the material could provide input into the environmental impact study. <br /> :1 <br /> 'f City Manager commented that many letters, petitions, etc. had been received, and <br /> Ii <br /> these will be placed on record and used in conjunction with material from public hearings. <br /> B. Bids, opened by Public Works Department November 16, 1971. e <br /> ALLEY PAVING: <br /> Btn 6th Ave & 7th Ave from Van Buren to Tyler <br /> il Contract Cost Cost to Prop. Owner Cost to Ci ty Budj, <br /> q Fred Stubbert $4,859.64 $6.65/fr ft 0 I <br /> I, <br /> ]1 Wildish Const. Co. 4,967.26 ,I <br /> !! i <br /> R. C. Parsons & Son -:-5,,~60.48 COMPLETION: Feb. 1, 197(2 <br /> " ,I <br /> !I SIDEWAEK, SANITARY SEWER & STORM SEWER q <br /> I: I <br /> II Within Danebo Neighborhood <br /> Ii park ,I <br /> 1 ~ :: <br /> I <br /> II <br /> I[ Devereaux & Pratt 20,693.76 20,693.76 25,000.00 <br /> ,I <br /> Ii Wildish Const. Co. 22,521. 72 (Eng. Est. 21,739 . Jj~) <br /> It <br /> I' Fred Stubbert 26,112 .11 I <br /> " i <br /> " Cushing Bros. , 28,212.19 COMPLETION: May 1, 1972 ! <br /> " Inc. <br /> " <br /> " <br /> ;1 ~. <br /> Ii STORM SEWER: <br /> :' Btn Sally Way (, Marlow Lane From <br /> i. <br /> :1 Norwood St. to approx. 500' West Basic Alternate <br /> I; <br /> Ii II <br /> " Cushing Bros. , Inc. 34,730.00 34,750.00 9.77 /fr. ft. 26,380.00 0 <br /> " <br /> II; Wildish Const. Co. 43,700.00 No bid (Eng. Est. 30,250) ii <br /> 1\ <br /> I! D G D Backhoe 52,906.40 No bid COMPo DATE: July 15, 1972/ e <br /> , I, <br /> " <br /> 11/22/71 - 3 <br /> ~ <br /> -- <br />