Laserfiche WebLink
<br />..... <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />J..S <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />C. Code Amendment, EWEB Directors' Terms <br />At the time the new Code was drafted terms of EWEB directors were contemplated at <br />six years, but decision was made to reduce the terms to four years. As a result, <br />terms of encumbent directors would be shorter than the term for which they were <br />elected. Copies of a Code amendment were previously distributed to Council mem- <br />bers which would correct that si tuation and allow present Board members to serve <br />out their elected terms. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mrs. Beal expressed concern that the amendment would permi t present directors to <br />serve more than the term for whi ch they were elected and more than the term set in <br />the new regulations, and that it is removing the power of the people to elect. She <br />commented on cri ticism of the Board when a member is appointed to fill an unexpired <br />two- or three-month term in order to run as an encumbent when it is known a director <br />does not intend to run for re-electi on. <br /> <br />Considerab~e discussion followed between Council members, Mr. Tiffany, chairman of <br />EWEB, and the Manager in clarification of the amendment and its intent - not of <br />extending terms of present members, but to permit their serving for the term elected. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Williams questioned having four directors from wards and one director elected at <br />large, whether the director-at-large has any significant pri vi leges ; he is concerned <br />because cost of running for the at-large seat would be different than for the other <br />four seats. Mr. Tiffany said the Board likes the ~ard situation since each director <br />has a smaller constituency and feels he can better represent the smaller area; he <br />granted the director holding the at-large position would encounter different problems, <br />but the Board has not discussed any change in that situation. <br /> <br />Mrs. Beal said a public hearing on the amendment under consideration would probably <br />be in order, and it was understood the amendment would come to the Council at its <br />February l4"l972 meeting as an ordinance and in that sense wil~ constitute a public <br />hearing. <br /> <br />Comm <br />2/9/72 <br />Pub Hrng <br /> <br />Council Bill No. ,9584 - Amending Code re: Terms of EWEB Directors was submitted and read the <br />first time by council bill number and title only, there being no counciiliman present request- <br />ing it be read in full. <br /> <br />Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that the council bill be read the second time by council <br />bill number only, with unanimous consetllo of the Council ,and'~:!1a~: enactment be considered at <br />this time. <br /> <br />Mr. Faye Bennett urged passage of the amendment citing the experience of the Board <br />and its reputation for efficient operation, and allowing the present members to serve <br />out the terms for which they were elected. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mrs. Marian Frank, League of Women Voters, read a statement recommending !hat vacan- <br />cies on the Eugene Water & Electric Board be filled by Council appo'di~tme~t-: .... <br />. - /. -"..... <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Upon question from Councilmen Teague and He~shner, Manager said'the amendment will allow <br />present members to continue for the terms for which they were elected. He said that <br />prior to adoption of the new Code members were elected for five-year terms'but actually <br />served, s,ix or until the time of the next election. The amendment changes the terms to <br />four years, but allows the encumbents whose terms wailild expire before the term for which <br />they were elected (Tiffany and Freeman) to continue for the full term. After that time <br />all members electEld will serve four years. <br /> <br />Councilman Mohr said that these two members, Tiffany and Freeman , without the adoption <br />of the amendment, would have to stand for re-election before their terms for which they <br />were' originally elected were ended., <br /> <br />Mrs. Campbell moved seconded by Mrs. Beal to amend Council Bill No. 9584 by Changing the word <br />"Board" in Paragraph, 5 to I' Ci ty Council." <br /> <br />Mayor Anderson explained that the amendment would change the ordinance to read that the <br />City Council may fill vacancies on EWEB; it now reads that the Board itself may fill <br />such vacancies. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Bennett questioned meaning of the amendment and Mayor Anderson again explained, upon <br />which Mr. Bennett commented that if the Board is going to run its own affairs the Board <br />should have the authority to fill its own vacancies. He said its just as consistent to <br />say vacancies on the Council should be filled by Board members. <br /> <br />Trygve Vik, 1675 Firland Boulevard, commented that the amendment would make a major and <br />far-reaching change, and that if it is to be acted upon at this time he would request <br />postponement of final action and referral to the Water Board. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Dave VanFossen, 1910 Woodlawn, asked for Charter research before action is taken. He <br />said he ,doesn't believe the Council has the right to amend in this fashion since he be- <br />lieves the Charter stipulates how Board vacancies are to be filled. <br /> <br />2/14/72 - 3 <br /> <br />"oj <br />