Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- <br /> <br />parking lots available to the public, and that if non-profit organizations are exempted it <br />would change the formula and would raise the question of other challenges. Mr. McDonald <br />said he would not be in favor of changing the formula but would be in favor of making an ex- <br />ception of the Christian Church assessment. Manager said it is hoped the Church assessment <br />of some $6,000.00 could be collected over a period of 20 years, non-collection would not <br />hamper the Church's operation or its existing programs, and the City would work with the Church <br />to relieve the burden if something can be done within the City's legal authority. It is not <br />the City's intent to take title to downtown properties through the district. <br /> <br />Mayor Anderson recalled the defeat at previous elections of efforts to finance parking over <br />the entire City, and said he did not feel the issue would be any more successful at this <br />time, especially with other commercial areas being developed. Manager said other methods <br />are being investigated to help not only with the parking structure but with the overall <br />central business district program through a committee of downtown merchants and the City. <br />Some presentation is expected within the next few weeks. If it is a successful and accept- <br />able formula, it may give considerable relief to these property owners. <br /> <br />A rollcall vote was taken on the motion to read C.B.958l the second time by <br />council bill number only, and motion carried, all councilmen present voting aye. <br /> <br />Mr: Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that the bill be approved and given final <br />passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, except Mr. McDonald <br />voting no. the bill was declared passed and numbered 16390. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mayor Anderson said he is concerned about parking for the central business district and hopes <br />a program can be developed that will not be the burden it now is but provide parking and re- <br />vitalize the downtown area. <br /> <br />B. Street and Easement Vacations <br />1. Vacating utility easement east of Hughes Street between Pattison and Avalon, <br />Geo. Pyle - Manager said problems with regard to subdividing and provision of sewers <br />should be resolved before the vacation becomes final, and recommended holding the <br />council bill. (See C.B.9591 page 14 .) <br /> <br />2. Vacating Bufton Street north of West 11th Avenue between Wallis Street and Bertelsen <br />Road, Geo. Wingard. (See C.B.9592 page 14.) <br /> <br />3. Vacating portion of Dillard Road at Snell Street, Gary Parks - Because of the <br />petitioners unwillingness to pay an existing street assessment, it is recom- <br />mended this council bill be held. (See C.B.9593 page 14.) <br /> <br />4. Vacatin easement on Lot 11 Block 41st Addition to Cow Palace eson <br />Acres Road west of Norkenzkie Barker. See C.B.9594 page 14. <br /> <br /> <br />5. Vacatin easement near Hawthorne between Fairfield and Baxter excluding <br />south 25 feet, Sorgenfri. See C.B.9595 page 14. <br /> <br />6. Vacatin <br />Dills- <br /> <br />easements Lots 13 and 18 Pine Ridge Estates north of Malabo Drive <br />See C.B.9596 page 14.) <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />C. Constitutional Amendment. Highway funds for Public Transportation <br />Margaret Patoine, People for Public Transportation, distributed copies of a proposed <br />constitutional amendment which would change restrictions on the vehicle tax revenue$, <br />and asked the Council's endorsement. Vehici:le tax revenues now can only be used for <br />public highways, roads, streets, parks, and recreational, scenic and historical places. <br />The proposed amendment would include public transportation systems and facilities. <br /> <br />Mrs. Campbell said the Council has already expressed to the Transit District approval <br />of the present method of funding. She wondered if the Council is being asked to <br />disapprove the present method. Mrs. Patoine said they hope that with more money there <br />is chance for a better transportation system; under the present funding it is definitely <br />limited. They hope for a complete County system. <br /> <br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mrs. Campbell that the Council endorse and support tOe <br />proposition of this Constitutional amendment. <br /> <br />Mr'. Mohr suggested Council members have copies of the Oregon municipal poliCIJ on dedi- <br />cated highway funds before making a decision. Mrs. Patoine oommented on the number <br />of' organizations which have endorsed the proposal and said it would provide a balanced <br />tz'ansportation system. It would not short funds for highways, the State would con <br />tinue to get them as needed. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mz'. Teague asked if the staff has reviewed the proposal. Manager said they have no <br />knowledge of the proposal. He suggested the. item be placed on the consent calendar <br />or' for public !learing at the next meeting. <br /> <br />Mrs. Beal'withdrew her motion and asked that the item be placed on the February 28,1972 <br />Council agenda for public hearing. <br /> <br />Mrs. Campbell withdrew her second saying G1 public hearing would open the subject of <br />use of the employers' tax now financing mass transi t and the Council should be prepared <br /> <br />.H,J' <br />u" <br /> <br />2/28/72 - 3 <br /> <br />\'::- <br />