Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Mr. Langan showed Council members the proposed location on a map and said he has an <br /> option on the property and was under the impression the application was approved. <br /> Manager reviewed the Changes in procedure for processing applications and explained <br /> that the Council action is recommendation, the GLCC has final authority. <br /> - <br />I: Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Teague to recommend. against granting this e <br /> license. <br /> Councilman Williams noted, in view of testimony with regard to proximity to schools, <br /> that, there is a pizza parlor across the street from the proposed location which serves <br /> be~~.' ' <br /> Vote was taken on the motion as stated. Motion carried, all councilmen present <br /> voting aye,' except Mr. Williams and Mrs. Campbell voting no. <br /> C. Zone Changes <br /> 1- West 11th between Lawrence and Washington (McNutt) - Requests C-2 SR <br /> ,.- --- --. - - Planning com=- <br /> 'Zone Change, West 11th between Lawrence and Washington (McNutt) <br /> mission May 2, 1972 recommended C-2 SR zoning (now Rood) with site review pro- <br /> cedures on parking provision and landscaping and buffering of site before <br /> issuance of building permit. The property lies west of the existing State Em- <br /> ployment Departmen,t. a!ld~ill be used for additional building and parking space. <br /> Councilman Williams asked in view of the commercial uses noted on the corner <br /> of that block whether it would be advisable to consider rezoning the rest of <br /> the block to conform to use in existence. Assistant Planning Director ex- <br /> plained that the corner property, on which there is an office under non-conform-' . <br /> ing use, will be considered for C-2 zoning in July and the property between that <br /> and the balance of the block also will be considered for C-2 and C-2 SR zoning. Comm <br /> The Planning Commission has decided to hold further commercial zoning in light 6/14/72 <br /> of residents' concerns wi th regard to preservation of that area for residential PubHrng <br /> uses. <br /> Council Bill No. 9737 - Rezoning To C-2 SR area on West 11th between Lawrence and Washington, <br /> was submitted and read the first time by council bill number and <br /> title only, there being no councilman present requesting that it <br /> be read in full. <br /> Vern Gleaves, representing John McNutt, owner of the West 11th property adjacent to the <br /> State Employment office, said the State plans to extend its parking space to the west. It <br /> was felt appropriate to determine the Council's reaction to rezoning the property now used <br /> for parking (under conditional use permit) prior to Planning Commission consideration of <br /> qommercial zoning (C-2) on the balance of the property on~the south side of 11th west of the <br /> subject property. Site 'review procedure on the C-2 zoning is acceptable to the petitioner. I <br /> Mr. Gleaves said the only projected use for these properties is for enlargement of Depart- <br /> ment of Employment facilities. <br /> In response to Councilman Hershner, Mr. Gleaves said if rezoning of the one lot, is rejected ,. <br /> by the Council, the Commission would not be inclined to rezone other properties to the west. <br /> Mr. Mohr said that consideration at this time is given only IO this petition, to relieve a \4 <br /> space problem. He would be reluctant to go any further than that. <br /> Mrs. Beal asked whether the site review procedure will apply to the new construction or only <br /> to the proposed enlargement of the parking area. Mr., Gleaves said the site review pro- <br /> cedure will apply only to the property under consideration now, although in development of <br /> the adjacent lot for parking there are certain requirements of conditional use with regard <br /> to screening. It was further brought out that the zoning ordinance specifically requires, I <br /> under site review, approval of off-street parkigg, ingress and egress ,and buffering. <br /> Mrs. Campbell asked the Council to also consider that the group interested in planning for <br /> the area immediately west of downtown asked no further commercial zoning which would tend <br /> to contribute to deterioration of the residential character of the neighborhood. <br /> Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that the bill be read the second time by <br /> council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council and that enact- <br /> ment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was <br /> read the second time by council bill number only. <br /> Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that the bill be approved 'and given final . <br /> passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was de- <br /> 'clared passed and numbered 16533. <br /> 2. 1755 West 18th (Daggett) - Requests C-l SR <br /> Planning Commission June 6, 1972 recommended approval. COmIn <br /> Mr. Mohr moved seConded by Mrs. Bea~ to ho~d a'pub~ic hearing on'the request. 6/2~/72 <br /> Motion carried unanimously. ,5 Pub Hrng <br /> J 6/26/72 - 2 <br />