07/10/1972 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-- - \ Discussion followed between Council members, staff, and Mr. Cheevers on alternatives if the alley is not paved, if it is vacated, possibility of agreement between property owners to effect vacation. Staff indicated the project could be delayed if investigation of vacation is desired. . Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal to hold the award until the July 24, 1972 Council meeting for a report on possible vacation ot~the right-of-way. Councilman McDonald said since the petition was signed by owners of more than 75% of the footage abutting the alley the project should be awarded. He felt not going ahead with the work with that large a percentage petitioning would be setting precedent. Also, that al- though Mr. Cheevers' property does not benefit to a certain extent at this time, there is the possibility that the paving will be of benefit in the future. Mayor Anderson said there is no set policy with regard to consideration of percentages petitioning an improve- ment, each one should be considered on contingencies which develop. He said it would be appropriate if the Council wished to develop a policy with regard to alley paving to discuss it in the future. Mrs. Beal reviewed her ~easons for favoring delay of the project, saying the vacation possibility should be investigated before requiring Mr. ilieevers to pay an assessment for paving which is of no benefit to him. Vote was taken on the motion to hold until July 24. Motion carried, all councilmen present voting aye, except Mr. McDonald voting no. . I)~) 2. Paving and sewer Myers Road from Gilham Road to 450 feet west (698) - Held from _J_~~~_,.~_~L.l9.?.?___Tll.~etiI)K.c~_ee tab!:lla.tion June 26l!liE_~!~~).. _ ~ _.._-~ - ----..~~ -~--- ,._" - ~ . ~ .' ..,~. . ~' Public Works Director said the Department was unable to make contact with the owner of property on the south side of the street. He listed possible options: (1) Refuse con- ',I tract; (2) accept project as bid; or (3) cut it back to the intersection. In answer to I Mr. Mohr, he said new bids would not have to be called since cutting back and including the intersection would fall within the reduction limit of the contract. " < " Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal to award contract to the lowbidder, paving only to the west side of the intersection. On questioning from Mr. Hershner, Public Works Director explained that if the paving is ,I carried approximat€?ly 66 feet west of the intersection on the south side it would clear the develper's property: Manager suggested that the contract be awarded on the low bid i I up to and including the intersection with the alternative that if the developer wants paving in front of his lot west of the intersection the staff would have authority to award con- tract also for the south half of the street to the west. 1 I With the consent of Mr. Mohr and Mrs. Beal, the motion was restated to award the contract as suggested. Rollcall vote. Motion carried, all councilmen , present voting aye. e 3. Bid Opening - July 6, 1972 Project and Name of Bidder Contract Cost Cost to Cost to Amount I Paving, Sanitary and Storm Sewer Basic Alternate Abutting Property City Budgeted Within Summit Side Park (830) Wildish Construction $19,678.50 $19,559.40 T.L.1800 $1,682 Pvg 15.72 fr.ft. - Eugene Sand & Gravel No Bid 20,276.59 T.L.3600 $2,269 Pvg ~~.86 fr.ft. , , I Devereaux & Pratt 22,479.50 21,064.40 Sub Pvg $1,918/1ot (3) Sub Strm $1,781/1ot (6) Sub San $1,228/105 (3) \ Completion Date: September 15,1972 Within 1st Addn Southridge and Vine'Maple Drive from Spring Blvd to 300 feet south (864) Wildish Construction $81,358.65 $79,417.60 36'pvg $14.95 fr.ft. - - Eugene Sand & Gravel No Bid .89,366.39 28'Pvg $12.78 fr.ft. Devereaux & Pratt 90,335.40 81,640.25 20'Pvg $ 9.90 fr.ft., I Strm $214.00/1ot (34) , I Lat $ O.ll/sq.ft. ~ I \ Serv $ 90.00 ea (21) t '1 Levy $ 0.005/sq.ft. 1._____--- .. -- .-- -----.---------.. --- Completi..o~_Date :~p..temb_er 15, 197_2__.~__ 020 \0 7/10/72 - 4