Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- - . ....... --~...-:..,. '--, , <br /> .-- ~-_.- ---- ..;..--- ---- ."_._---.- -~-- <br />'Councilman Hershner, member of the subcommittee, said his understanding of the re- <br />,quest was not just non-profit or private clubs but that non-discrimination would be <br />:a criterion for the granting of any liquor license, business or otherwise. <br />I There was further discussion wi th regard to presenting legislation at the State . <br />level for inclusion of non-discrimination as requisite to issuance of liquor li- <br />,censes, possibility of revoking property tax exemptions for those institutions <br />Iwhich discriminate in membership and services, the reasons for those exemptions, <br />consti tutional protection of right of free assembly, method of achieving non- <br />discrimination wi thout infringing on that right. <br />Dean OWens, member of the Human Rights Commission, said he drafted the original <br />resolution presented to the Council and feels strongly that it should be adopted. <br />He said it was the intent of the Commission to put all available legal pressure <br />on liquor licensing procedures in the community. He said he would challenge the <br />City Attorney's opinion that Council's recol111llendation to deny licenses on the <br />basis of discrimination would be illegal. Mr. Owens said the Commission in in- <br />i ve.stigating guidelines for issuance of liquor permits fel.t that any applicant could <br />be considered morally unfi t if he discriminates and therefore could be denied a <br />license. He further stated the Council should adopt the resolution requiring an <br />affidavit of non-discrimination to be consistent with its already adopted policy I <br />,of equal rights in creation of the Human Rights Commission. <br />Mrs. Beal expressed the opinion that adoption of the affidavit procedure and <br />recommending. against licenses on the basis of discrimination may not have legal . <br />bearing on the Liquor Control Commission's action, but is a moral obligation on <br />the part of the Ci ty and would in time have effect on the Liquor Commission's <br />decisions. <br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Bradshaw to adopt the original resolution submitted <br />by the Human Rights Commission requiring non-discrimination affidavit from liquor I <br />license applicants. <br /> , <br />CounCilman Williams pointed- out that there- was only one vote in. the-.sUbcoriiinittee <br />against presenting its report to the Council; subcommittee took action against <br />adoption of a resolution which would call for legislation repealing property tax <br />exemption for private clubs which discriminate in their membership and services. <br />He said copies of that resolution would be made available to Council members if <br />desired. It was understood copies of the resolution presented initially by the <br />Human Rights Commission would be distributed to Council members.. <br />Councilman Hershner indicated he would have to leave the meeting in view of the <br />! time, but asked l}.ow the Council's recommendation against issuance of a license is <br />I transmi tted to the OLCC in the event an affidavi t is not signed by an applicant - <br />. whether it would be confused with or detract from other reasons for recommending <br />1 denial. Manager said normally a letter of transmittal is forwarded to OLCC as . <br />Iwell as minutes of Council meeting on that particular issue. <br />I <br />Councilman Mohr said the subcommi ttee' s report indicated its attempt to find a <br />. method whereby the City Council would have authority to make decisions on dis- <br />criminatory practices, not just passing its moral judgment in an attempt to af- <br />fect another agency's decision. He suggested holding action on the motion to <br />adopt the original resolution until the formal Council meeting. Comm <br /> 10/11/72 <br />Question was called for and vote taken on the motion as stated. Motion carried, Pub Hrng <br />Mrs. Beal, Mrs. Campbell, and Mr.Bradshaw voting aye; Messrs. Mohr and Williams <br />voting no. <br />Resolution No. 2114 - Requiring affidavit re: Non-discrimination in service and member- <br />ship for affirmative recommendation for liquor license applications, was submitted. <br />Manager reviewed presentation of the Human Rights Commission request for affidavit require- <br />ment, referral to Council/Human Rights subcommittee, and Council action at committee-of-the- <br />whole meeting (see committee minutes October 11, 1972 above). <br />Bobby Edwards, chairman of the Human Rights Commission, asked adoption of the resolution, <br />saying the affidavit requirement would be a step in eliminating discrimination in this one . <br />area - service and membership requirements in private clubs. <br />Molly Anderson and Dean Owens, members of the Human Rights Commission, urged adoption of the <br />resolution. Ms. Anderson said that private clubs which allow members to bring guests and <br />which serve weddings and receptions, luncheons, bridge clubs, etc., cannot be considered <br />pri vate clubs, and should not be a.l?le to circumvent the law on discrimination. She said it <br />is difficult to find supportive law in this instance, but there is no conflict with existing <br /> 307 lQ/24I12 .,... T <br /> ~ <br />