Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'. <br /> <br />Public Works Director reviewed the bids submitted, calling attention to the 10~ per <br />square foot cost on the Centennial Boulevard sewer as compared to the30~ per square <br />foot cost on bids submitted previously and rejected. Award of contract on the low <br />bid on each of the projects was recommended. <br /> <br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Williams to approve award of contract <br />as recommended. <br /> <br />Miles McKay of McKay Investment commented on the length of time property to be served <br />by the Centennial Boulevard sewer has been inside the City without sewer service. <br />Property owners have paid monthly sewer charges as well as their part of bond issue. <br />He said that the City has participated in sewer project costs for recently annexed <br />areas such as Bethel/Danebo and although it is paying about $11,000 of the Centennial <br />project he felt the City should also participate to the extent of providing engineer- <br />ing and supervisory costs and the ~~ per square foot charge. He felt too some credit <br />should be given for salvage value of the pumping stations necessary to operation of <br />the line. <br /> <br />Roger:'Hannum of Hannum Motors felt the proposed sewer necessary and thought the cost <br />was fair. However, he expressed concern about the cost for pumping stations. He said <br />it was his understanding their use if temporary and will be discontinued when the East <br />Bank interceptor is installed. He said he realized another assessment couldn't be <br />levied when the East Bank line is installed, but felt because the extra pumping stations <br />were-required there should be some participation in their cost by the City. <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />Letters were read from Frank Yok who is proposing to operate a restaurant on Centennial <br />Boulevard, and Parmenter Pontiac Company, 2121 Centennial Boulevard. Mr. Yok urged ap- <br />proval of the bid award. Mr. Parmenter opposed the sewer installation if it was tempo- <br />rary and being put in to accommodate possible subdivision in the area. However, if it <br />is installed, he asked that assessments be reduced to a more realistic rate and <br />charged equitably to those properties involved. <br /> <br />Public Works Director explained that only the pressure line and pumping facilities <br />will be temporary. The line has been designed so that laterals will tie into the East <br />Bank line and function as a gravity system when it is installed. There is no time <br />estimate as to when fue East Bank line will be put in, but because of Federal funding <br />changes it is not anticipated in the near future. Redesign of this project added <br />another pumping station. This was done to avoid the depth of construction provided in <br />the first design which resulted in the 30~ per square foot bid cost. The pumping sta- <br />tions have been assessed to the benefiting properties; the $11,000 paid by the City is <br />for tunneling under Coburg Road. He added that when the East Bank line is installed <br />only an 8-inch equivalent will be charged abutting properties. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />With regard to Mr. McKay's request for exemption from the ~~ per square foot levy, <br />Public Works Director said the City is required by ordinance to assess that charge <br />on properties which have been annexed since 1948. Those funds are used for trunk <br />line systems and are one of the sources from which the City pays for pipe over eight <br />inches in size. He added that the project under discussion consists entirely of eight- <br />inch pipe. <br /> <br />In answer to Mr. McKay's request for City participation in sewer costs for newly <br />annexed areas, Manager explained that the City did pay part of the costs for pump <br />station for the Valley River Center area and to the north. In that instance the City <br />had a contract with Valley River whereby either the City built a sewer to serve the <br />Center within an agreed'upon length of time, or Valley River had the option of build- <br />ing its own system and not annexing to the City. <br /> <br />With regard to the salvage value of the pump stations, Public Works Director said any <br />salvage value would depend upon the length of time they are in the ground. <br /> <br />In answer to Councilman Williams' question with regard to the assessment for temporary <br />installation, Public Works Director explained that these pump;ing stations will be <br />totally useless to the City's sewer system once the East Bank trunk is constructed. <br />A permanent system would, not need the pumping stations so it is felt the request for <br />sewers prior to permanent installation justifies charging for the temporary measures. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Councilwoman Beal asked why the temporary installations are being made when property <br />owners requesting them knew before they went into that area that sewers were not <br />.available. Manag~r explained that a good deal of development had occurred in that <br />general area and more is proposed. For that reason~a number of people have requested <br />the service knowing they would be assessed. The question is the matter of making that <br />assessment equitable to all. <br /> <br />There was further discussion on basis of assessment for the temporary installation, <br />explanation of policy on temporary construction, where costs would fall if not assessed, <br /> <br />51 <br /> <br />2/26/73 - 3 <br />