Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />Councilwoman Campbell favored support of this legislation without asking for amendment <br />which would make permissive rather than mandatory OLCC consideration of local govern- <br />ment negative recommendations on issuance of liquor licenses. She felt the Council <br />would not be able to carry out a requirement for affidavit from liquor dispensers with <br />regard to non-discrimination should S.B.6 not be passed. Councilman Murray agreed. <br /> <br />Councilman Williams said he agreed with the editorial stand of the Eugene Register-Guard <br />that passage of S.B.6 would be an excellent way to guarantee development of graft with- <br />in the City since it would make the livelihood of a business solely dependent upon the <br />moral judgment of a political body. He said he would not like to see that type of arbi- <br />trary power established. He favored endorsement of the original Council committee action. <br />Councilman Hershner agreed and said amendments to the bill would give OLCC recognition <br />of City recommendations by statute, whereas now OLCC takes the position that it has no <br />authority unless those recommendations can be substantiated in a court of Inw. He <br />added that this l~gislation could lead to local options in the State. <br /> <br />Councilman Murray argued that the Council could consider a list of criteria upon which <br />to judge liquor license applications, and that discrimination could be one of those <br />things which would be adequate cause to deny a license. He said he would like to see <br />the Council have that tool. <br /> <br />'e <br /> <br />There was further discussion with r~gard to other similar legislation being introduced, <br />effect of this legislation on remote areas of the State, more' participation by local <br />government in decisions at the State level, desirability of having decisions made by <br />elected officials rather than appointive, etc. <br /> <br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Williams to support S.B.6 and instruct the <br />Legislative Analyst to so lobby. Motion carried, Councilmen Beal, Campbell, <br />Murray, Wood, and Mayor Anderson voting aye; Councilmen Williams, McDonald, <br />Hershner, and Keller voting no. <br /> <br />3.iS.B.266 - Establishes rehabilitation loans up to $1,000 per person for alco- <br />~ holic rehabilitation . <br />i Councilwoman Beal suggested no position be taken in view of current review of <br />, the entire alcoholic program. At the request of Councilman Murray it was <br />j,a~:::,~_~~!,~ bill would be placed on a future agenda.,. ...' <br />- '-'-""'t(~-:'" .'~_"'_____A"_""__.",,,_,_~,__ .,'__ '._._.'._'~.. ,...., ..~i~r_.,H.~._. <br /> <br />Comm <br />2/28/73 <br />Approve <br /> <br />H.B.2745 - 10% OLCCFunds to Mental Health Division for rehabilitation <br />Councilman Murray said'he'would like to see the Council support S.B.266. He felt <br />this a sensible way t~ ~pproach the problem in view of the statistics on alcoholics <br />and related traffic accidents, and the cost incurred in rehabilitation. <br /> <br />At the request of Councilman Wood, Manager presented H.B.2745 which would appropriate <br />10% of OLCC funds to the Mental Health Division for alcoholic and drug rehabilitation. <br />Hearing is scheduled on this bill Thursday, March 15. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Williams that if the Council supports S.B.266 <br />arid H.B.2745 after. full discussion at its, March';!l!! committe,e meeting, that will <br />be interpreted as' official position of the Council and so ~ransmitted to the <br />legiSlative committees considering the bills. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />4.' S.C.R.4 - tIn memoriam: Charles Andrew "Shy" Huntington <br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Williams to support S.C.R.4. Motion carried <br />! unanimously. <br /> <br />5.!H.B.210B - Establishes the principle of State payment in lieu of property tax <br />for fire protection to State facilities, and appropriates an in- <br />significant amount of m:mey therefor <br />Manager explained that the bill would authorize the State ,to make payments to <br />cities in lieu of property tax for fire protection in those cities where the <br />State has substantial real estate development; The bill appropriates $50,000 ; <br />per year for those payments. Staff would like to see the principle established \ <br />land extended to police and other services being performed for ,the State by cities,\ <br />I but with amendment to encompass agreements between cities and . agencies of the ! <br />: S,tate receiving protection. A <br /> <br />,.Comm <br />2/28/73 <br />Approve. <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mrs. Cazppbell to s.u.pport H.B.210B in prj.nciple. <br /> <br />, <br />i. <br /> <br />; Councilman Williams suggested that the Legislative Analyst be instructed to work <br />for legislation providing sufficient money to reimburse ci. ties for services <br />. rendered the State. Manager explained that initially the bill pr~vided for a <br />larger amount of money but was limi ted to fire protection only. The League of <br />Oregon Cities feels it is desirable to gain favorable vote on theprineiplQ <br />of payment by the State and will continue to support this bill. <br /> <br />1'3 <br /> <br />3/12/73 - 5 <br />