Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner that the Boundary Commission be asked not to <br /> annex the Crest/Blanton property, pending completion of the South Hills studies. <br />. Councilman Keller mentioned the obligation of the Council to make a decision on the <br /> annexation as soon as the South Hills rerort is available. <br /> Vote was taken on the motion as stated. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> B. Revocable Permit - Watchman Trailer at Curleyts Autp Repair, 3762 West 11th <br /> Requested by Wesley Zumwalt. Staff recommends approval. <br /> . Public hearing was held with no testimony presented. <br /> Resolution No. 2200 - Granting revocable permit for nightwatchman trailer at 3762 <br /> West 11th was submitted. " <br /> Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. McDonald to adopt the resolution. Motion carried <br /> unanimously. <br /> C. Annexati'ons <br /> l. 12.32 acres south of I~5 east of Henderson (General Properties) <br />. Planning Commission recommended denial on May 29, 1973. Council previously <br /> viewed on tour. <br /> Public hearing was held with no testimony presented. <br /> Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner to deny the annexation, <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 2. 39.0 acres north of Harlow Road between Arcadia Drive and I-5 (Barnes/Bond) <br /> Planning Commission recommended denial on May 29, 1973. Council previously <br /> viewed on tour <br /> Public hearing was opened. <br /> Clay Barnes, 65 West 30th Avenue, described location of the property, access and soil <br /> I conditions! He urged annexation, saying the propertyts location within the Cityts service <br /> boundary is ideal for subdivision. He suggested location of a road along the east side <br /> of lots facing Arcadia Street to provide them access should development of the back <br /> portions of their properties be desired. <br />.- Dan Leahy, realtor, said he suggested a meeting with owners of properties on Arcadia <br /> Drive with the idea of overcoming their opposition to being included. He thought if they <br />- - were presented with a plan for overall development of the area, including their properties, <br /> they would probably be in favor of annexation. He presented a letter from the Lane County <br /> Sanitarian recommending annexation on the basis of the propertyts being a marginal area so <br /> " far as use of septic tanks is concerned. <br /> Mr. and Mrs. Billy Sears, 481 Arcadia; Dorothy Pearl, 478 Arcadia; A. A. York, 339 <br /> Arcadia Drive opposed the annexation. Their opposition was hased on the arguments that <br /> the developers were interested only in financial gain, traffic congestion would increase, <br /> schools would be further overcrowded, sewers are not needed at this time, multiple-family <br /> dwellings are not wanted, etc. <br /> Manager noted petitions received signed by owners of properties on Arcadia Drive stating <br /> they did not favor annexation erE their properties atl-"this time. He said the Planning <br /> Commission felt the requested annexation would not be logical unless it included the:, <br /> properties on Arcadia Drive. Without inclusion of those properties a County area surrounded <br /> on three sides by the City would result. Manager noted the arguments with regard to access <br /> and traffic ppoblems and said in all fairness it should be said that a good street system <br /> built into the area proposed for annexation could relieve the traffic congestion problems <br /> there as well as accommodate the new development. <br />e; Public hearing was closed, no further testimony being presented. <br /> Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner to deny the annexation. Motion <br /> carried unanimously. <br /> Short recess was taken. <br /> 7/9/73 - 3 <br /> 2..1~ <br />