Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . <br /> Councilman Williams didn't like the idea of removing local authority which might <br /> legalize blocking of railroad crossings for long periods of time. Assistant Manager <br />- answered that the regulations will be administered by the Public utility Commissioner <br /> and that the City under the recently enacted law has no authority in that regard. <br /> Traffic Engineer added that hearings are anticipated before the PUC to establish <br /> limits on length of time a crossing may be blocked. It is fel t then there will be <br /> stronger enforcement wi th regard to any violations of PUC orders than would be possible <br /> under municipal regulations. Assistant Attorney Swanson noted that the language of <br /> the State legislation pre-empts enforcement of city ordinances after October 5, so <br /> the only practical way is to try for enforcement action through the PUC. He sug- <br /> gested the Council may want to adopt a resolution directed to the PUC with regard Comm <br /> to blocking railroad crossings in Eugene. 10/3/73 <br /> Pub Hrng <br /> Mrs. 13eal moved seconded by Hr. Murray to amend the Code as requested. Motion carried, <br /> all Council members present voting aye, except Mr. Williams voting no. <br /> Councilman Wood asked whether it was intended to direct a resolution to the Com- <br /> missioner as suggested. Assistant Manager replied that staff will be pursuing the <br /> matter because ofCJUestions concerning emergency equipment crossing the tracks, etc. <br /> . ......., ", . -. "'~""-"~'"""--"~"'~'.' _.~', ........_- <br /> Assistant Manager said that in a conversation with the Public Utility Commissioner since <br /> the October 3 committee meeting it was recommended that this section be left in the City <br /> Code until the PUC develops regulations under the new law. The PUC indicated support of <br />e that section of the City's Code until their regulations are formalized. <br /> Public hearing was held with no testimony presented. <br /> No action was taken. <br /> C. Bids <br /> 1. Remodeling Council Chamber - Bids received September 14, 1973: <br /> Honer & Associates $ 24,798 <br /> Vik Construction 18,946 <br /> V. A. Harding Construction 18,346 <br /> A. E. Stafford 17,951 <br /> Alternates: l. Stafford Complete " $ 17,951 <br /> 2. Stafford less all deletions 14,087 <br /> 3. Stafford less deletions with fans 14,787 <br /> 4. Stafford less deletions with teak 14,437 <br /> 5. Stafford less deletions with fans and teak 15,137 <br /> . <br /> Manager reviewed bids for remodeling the Council Chamber to provide office space <br /> for Council members. He said negotiations with Stafford resulted in a cost for <br />- the remodeling less than the $15,000 originally estimated. This was accomplished <br /> by simplification of the air return system and deletion from the original specifica- <br /> tions.of loud speakers and two exhaust fans. Award of contract to Stafford on <br /> the bid price less deletions at a total price of $14,437 ,was recommended. In <br /> answer to Councilman McDonald, Manager said the total amount budgeted for the <br /> work was $17,000. <br /> Councilman Hershner ask~d wh~~ the t~ak,refer~ed .to in the bid tabulation. Manager <br /> explained that consideration was given to deletion of the teak plywood finish on <br /> the remodeled portion, using instead painted sheetrock. It involved about $350. <br /> Staff recommended going ahead with the teak finish to keep the decor of the re- <br /> modeled portion similar to the rest of the Chamber. Mrs. Beal felt maintenance <br /> would be less with the, use of the teak finish. <br /> . . <br /> Public hearing was held with no testimony presented. <br /> Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Williams to award contract to A.E.Stafford <br /> on Alternate 4, less deletions with teak, on the bid price of $14,437. <br /> Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, motion carried. <br />e 2. Phase II Echo Hollow pool Landscaping - Parks Department (Opened October 3, 1973) <br /> Wildish Construction Co. $ 12,812.90 <br /> Devereaux & Pratt 8,476.70 <br /> Nicholson Construction 7,300.22 <br /> '. Concrete Unlimited ,6,923.14 <br /> " <br /> Office Estimate 8,670.10 <br /> .. <br /> 10/8/73 - 3 <br /> 297 . <br />