Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Postponement was recommended because of lack of notification of public hearing to <br />Boon's and Pape' Bros. <br /> <br />~ Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Williams that the staff appeal be postponed <br />... to the November 5, 1973 Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />II - Consent Calendar <br />Items acted upon with one motion after discussion of individual items if requested. <br />Previously discussed at committee-of-the-whole meetings on October 10 (Present: <br />Mayor Anderson; Councilmen Beal (arrived later), McDonald, Hershner, Campbell, Keller, <br />Murray, and Wood) and October 17, 1973 (Present: Councilmen Beal (presiding), McDonald, <br />Williams, Hershner, Campbell, Keller, Murray, and Wood). Minutes of those meetings <br />appear below printed in italics. <br />~ <br /> <br />A.Active Bethel Citizens request for review of assessment procedures - Copies of letter' <br />received from the Active Bethel Citizens (ABC) in August were distributed to Council <br />imembers with agenda of this committee meeting. ABC requested a study of methods of <br />assessing for street improvements and consideration of aid for persons on low or <br />fixed incomes whose property may be assessed for improvements. Another concern was <br />extension of Barger Drive to the west city limits. Manager e~plained that the letter <br />was held because of work in progress on development of a neW method of assessment <br />for alley paving and the thought that the entire question could be brought to the <br />Council at one time. <br /> <br />~ 'Manager commented on the complexity of assessing for public improvements, involving <br />~ Charter amendments which require a great deal of study and consideration before <br />changes are proposed, particularly if the c.hanges will require voter approval. He <br />;suggested discussion at this time might center on how to proceed - continue ~ith <br />the present study of assessments, ifivolve a Coun~il committee, assign staff to <br />work'on the whole question of assessments for public improvements, etc. He noted <br />: the thrust of the ABC concern was the benefit factor as it applied to different <br />;land uses. They feel the present method is not equitable because of the mixture <br />of single- and multiple-family structures in the community. <br /> <br />Ed Lundberg, 4120 Concord Street, representing the ABC group, confirmed their con- <br />: cern with assessments against single~fa~ily units made on the same basi~.as assess- <br />ments agai~st larger uni ts. He pi ted the Oakway Ro~? ~'IJ'ing as an example of <br />assessment against abutting properties when ~he project serves a much larger area. <br /> <br />Mr. Murray moved seconded by Mr. Wood that the question be referred to the sub- *** <br />commi ttee on alley assessments (Councilmen Beal and Hershner and former Councilman <br />Bradshaw) ~nd request that specific recommendations be returned to the Council re- <br />garding determination of assessments, giving particular attention to the alternate <br />methods of assessments mentioned in the correspondence from the ABC. <br /> <br />a : Councilman McDonald wondered whether it would be more appropriate to appoint a com- <br />W : mittee separate from that studying alley assessments. His reasoning lVas that on alley: <br />improvements it was a case of assessing single-family homes on one side and multiple- <br />:family units on the other side, whereas he felt the concerns with regard to street <br />:assessments were entirely different. He thought too that as the community grows <br />I and there is a greater demand for public ,improvements, if there was to be considera- <br />,tion of changing the procedure of assess~ng for those improvements, there should be <br />'a separa te caromi ttee created. . _ _~ _ _ <br />. '---~-----~-~~_..- ..,~-..\ <br /> <br /> <br />Councilwoman Beal arrived at the meeting. <br /> <br />Councilman Murray had no objections to Mr. McDonald's suggestion. However, he <br />i thought the alley assessment committee would have a head start in accruing knowledge <br />,on which to base recommendations. Councilman Hershner agreed with that view. He <br />noted however that if that committee is to be charged with other areas of concern an <br />appointment should be made to replace former Councilman Bradshaw. Manager suggested <br />that if the motion was accepted Mr. Bradshaw's presence on the committee might be <br />appropriate as a layman representing the public rather than as a councilman. <br /> <br />Councilman Keller's understanding of the motion was clarified - that the present <br />committee studying the method of assessing for alley improvements would pick up <br />~ additional responsibility of making recommendations on the ABC suggestions for <br />, street improvement assessments. <br /> <br />Councilwoman Beal wondered whether the legal memo was ready which was requested <br />some time ago with regard to Charter amendment to permit some other than the present, <br />method of assessing for alley improvements. She didn't think the committee could ; <br />function without that information. Manager acknowledged that preparation of an <br />amendmel!.t had.taken muc~~9~~r_!=hca..n~nti_c.i_pat~d'_u1!~__sa_id the latest draft ~as_, <br /> <br /> <br />'3'2. 10/23/73 - 3 <br />