Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Helen Daugherty, owner of Boon's Red Carpet Motel, expressed extreme irritation <br /> with the handling of the appeal. She did not understand the reasoning'behind <br /> appealing a board of appeals decision. She stated she has a prepaid lease for the <br /> ground, which was purchased in 1968, before the sign code was put into effect and . <br /> had obtained a permit from the highway department for the sign. She also mentioned <br /> that, although the present sign is non-conforming, she is planning to replace it with <br /> a conforming one. <br /> Al Whetstine, 1735 McLean, brought up the point that the Sign Board has stated this <br /> variance would not set a precedent. On that basis, he felt this particular one <br /> should be granted. <br /> Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr'. Murray that Council uphold the staff appeal and <br /> overrule the Sign Code Board of Appeals. Vote was taken on the motion, all councilmen <br /> present voting aye, except Mr. Hershner voting no and Mr. Williams and Mr. McDonald <br /> abstaining. <br /> 2. Pape Bros., Inc. <br /> The request for variance on this sign was to leave the sign at a heighth greater than <br /> permitted under the sign code. The purpose was to insure visibility since Pape Cat <br /> is below the grade of the highway and therefore the sign is lower. The Sign Code <br /> Board granted a variance' on September 17, 1973; the reason for the staff appeal of I <br /> that decision was that the question of dealing with grades above or below the surface <br /> of the street should be defined in the Code. It should be clarified whether allowing <br /> this type of sign variance should, in fact, be a granting of a variance or a . <br /> legislative decision. <br /> ~ <br /> Public hearing was opened. <br /> Roy Adkins, attorney for Pape Bros., 825 E. Park, Eugene, submitted a photo copy of <br /> a sketch showing the sign and its heighth. The 46-foot high sign is presently 27 <br /> feet above freeway grade, and the ground level is 16.5 feet below the road grade <br /> level. It, in effect, is sitting in a hole and is no higher above the road grade <br /> than identity signs of businesses directly across the freeway. <br /> Betty Niven, Eugene, mentioned that signs are basically and primarily for the purpose <br /> of identifying the business and that Papers sign would have to be regarded as <br /> advertising, not identity. At the time the sign code was adopted, there was <br /> considerable discussion regarding the question of grade. The problem frequently is <br /> that, in order to make a sign visible above the grade of the highway, it is also <br /> high enough that it becomes an intrusion on residential property. <br /> Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Wood to uphold the staff appeal and overrule the <br /> Sign Code Board of Appeals. In making the motion, she stated that perhaps council <br /> would want to take a look at the sign code and possibly make some changes but that, <br /> until done, exceptions should not be made. . <br /> .. , <br /> Mr. Hershner raised a question regarding the.'possibili ty of granting a variance for <br /> a certain length of time, until Council can look at the whole problem. Manager stated <br /> that granting a variance would be an indication of Council's desire for review and <br /> reconsideration but that it would be some time before this could be done. <br /> Vote was taken on .the motion, all council members present voting aye, except Mr. <br /> Hershner voting no and Mr. Williams and Mr. McDonald abstaining. <br /> C. Abatement, 1075 West 6th Avenue (Betterton/Olsen) <br /> Staff advises the property constitutes a fire hazard, as well as a health and structural <br /> hazard. Council has viewed the property on tour. <br /> Mr. Roe Betterton, a school teacher at Chemeteka in Salem, stated the property in question <br /> is owned by him but has been leased to a fellow who then got Mr. Olsen in as a lessee. <br /> Internal Revenue subsequently has locked him up, and therefore Mr. Betterton can do nothing <br /> at this time but indicated he would as soon as possible. Manager said it was his <br /> understanding the building is not locked up but rather standing wide open. Mr. Betterton , <br /> said the house is open but that the store next to it is locked up. Manager indicated it <br /> is the house that is being suggested for abatement, not the store. Mrs. Campbell added . <br /> that, if a fire occurred, it would be a terrible situation as it is located close to a <br /> motel. <br /> Resolution No. 2233 - Authorizing abatement at 1075 West 6th was submitted and <br /> read by number and title. <br /> Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Williams to authorize abatement. Rollcall vote was taken <br /> on the motion, which carried unanimously. <br /> ~~I 11/5/73 - 4 <br />