Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> and processed. Since last consideration of a resolution-calling 'for'a moratorium --.- - -, <br /> on zone changes in the Goodpasture Island area, some interest was expressed in de- <br /> velopment of criteria, rather than an outright moratorium, on which zone changes <br /> might or might not be considered since the requested study could take 18 months to ,~ <br /> complete. Staff discussion of legal problems involved in writing criteria and sustain- <br /> ing a moratorium led to the conclusion that if the proposed study took less time, <br /> perhaps six months, a moratorium would be more acceptable to applicants and more de- <br /> fensible legally. Manager suggested use of a consulting firm would complete the <br /> study in less time besides giving the kind of expertise necessary - economic develop- <br /> ment, marketing, etc. - which is not available on the present City staff. He asked <br /> :Council to consider a six-month moratorium on zone change applications in the Good- <br /> pasture Island area and to authorize negotiations with a consulting firm and funds <br /> for the desired study. He added that if Council agreed to this procedure a resolution <br /> on the moratorium and criteria for zone changes in the area would be prepared for adoption. <br /> ; Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Wood to adopt a six-month moratorium on zone change <br /> 'applications in the Goodpasture Island area and to authorize funds for study of com- Corom <br /> mercial needs in the area by a consulting firm. 12/12/73 <br /> Apprpve <br /> In answer to Councilman Murray, Mayor Anderson clarified the intent of the motion - <br /> a study of the area would take six months during which time no zoning decisions for <br /> that area would be made. <br /> !Councilman McDonald asked whether funds were available for the study. Planning <br /> ,Director said some funds not committed in the planning budget could be used. Manager ~'~ <br /> " <br /> :added that the matter would come back to the Council before any commitment is made on '" <br /> =.. <br /> , the amount. <br /> ~Vote was taken on the motion as stated. Motion carried,unanimousJy. <br />Tom Chambliss, 4040 Country Club Road, wanted to be assured of citizen participation in re- <br />finement of the 1990 Plan with respect to "opportunity areas" to ensure in1:egrity of the Plan. <br />He thought it necessary to decide now whether to expand parking areas to accommodate auto- <br />mobiles or stress use of mass transit, saying further development would make any study under- <br />taken useless. He urged enforcement of the moratorium and suggested the Urban Area Natural <br />Resources Advisory Committee address itself to the problems of expanded parking and use of <br />mass transit (Item 7 in the original resolution) and report its findings within six months. <br />This, he felt, would give the necessary citizen participation and input into any study made. <br />Annabel Kitzhaber, president of the League of Women Voters, read a prepared statement support- <br />ing the proposed six-month moratorium on zone chan~es in the Goodbasture Island area and <br />employment of a consultant to make the desired stu y. The League elieves redefinition <br />of portions of the Plan is necessary because of differing interpretations. Also, that the, <br />propose~stud~.WOUld ~rovide guidelines to bring a balance between developers, planners, <br />and pollcy ma lng bodles. The League questioned the responsibility for annexation agree- <br />ments and the policy of carrying County zoning over to the City upon annexation. ~-- <br />John McCulley, realtor, 2895 Oak Street, felt there should be no change in the 1990 Plan .~ <br />by the councils or commissioners without participation by the citizens who initiated it. <br />The land lying along Goodpasture Island Road, he said, was proposed for commercial use <br />In the Plan and should be used for that purpose. <br />Mary Milhaupt, 1500 Norkenzie Road, wanted further study of the Plan because of differing <br />interpretations of its provisions. <br />Jack Gardner, attorney, representing owners of property within the study area (Sylvanus Smith, <br />Clarence Brown, Clem Howell) noted that in previous rezoning requests made to accommodate <br />auto dealers the argument was presented that the area under discussion was the most appro- <br />priate place. He said that permitting commercial use in that area would maintain integrity <br />of the Plan for those people using it for guideline. Definitions of the Plan were recited <br />with respect to proposed uses designated for the Goodpasture Road area. Mr. Gardner noted <br />that changes to the General Plan were contemplated when it was adopted, but they were to be <br />made through citizen' input following guidelines of the Plan itself rather than through a <br />private study. And a private study would take much longer than the estimated six months, <br />he said, causing developers to lose the 1974 construction season. Slides were shown and <br />plats presented to illustrate there are no other available large areas which would accommo- <br />date large scale regional commercial use. Mr. Gardner said his clients would like to have <br />the former request (Hosey's) removed from the table to enable start of a planned unit de- -. <br />velopment north of Valley River. Mayor Anderson asked that comments be confined to total '.;. <br />development of the area when Mr. Gardner described the type of development planned by <br />Mr. Hosey. <br />Mr. Gardner continued with the request to stay the moratorium so that Eugene Dodge could <br />locate in the subject area; their lease in the downtown area will expire in June 1974. The <br />moratorium, he said, would not prevent development of the Goodpasture area in a residential <br />pattern which would be irreversible. He urged the Council to give some indication that uses <br />such as the Dodge dealership would be able to locate in an area meant for that use. <br /> ~,\ 12/17/73 - 6 <br />