Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- - -- -.....---. <br />.------~- <br />- - '. - ---~... --- _.-.- -......--~--- <br />f,., -A-question was raised reg~g possible pressure which. could he exerted by <br />1~\neighborhOOd groups. Mr. Williams r~sponded that precise conclusions need to be <br />: ,eached defining the relationship of a neighborhood organization to its own members, <br />, 0 others in the area who are not members, to the community as a whole and to the <br />~'city staff. The Community Goals Conference will deal with defining roles so as to <br />resolve any future possible conflicts. He does not see anything in the Laurel Hill <br />Plan that improperly infringes on the Councilor the City government. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />Resolution No. 2263 - Adopting Laurel Hill Neighborhood Growth Plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner to adopt the resolution. Motion carried <br />unanimously. <br /> <br />B. Zone Change west of Coburg Road north of Country Club Road - from RA to C-2 to C-2 SR <br />- (Zellner 1 - CA 74..:..5) 'Tax Lots 2200 and 2300 <br />Planning Commission - recommended approval March ..12, ..1974. - Staff notes, Planning <br />Commission minutes and Planning Commission findings in making recommendation were <br />previously distributed to Council members and by reference thereto made a part of <br />this record. A hearing had been called for April 8, but the proponents were unable <br />to come so the Council continued the hearing to April 22. <br /> <br />-rl <br />I <br /> <br />No Council member present declared the intent to abstain from voting on the issue. <br /> <br />Public hearing was opened. <br /> <br />Jim Longwood, 725 Country Club Road, expressed concern with an amendment in the <br />Planning Commission motion which made granting of the zone change subject to 'the <br />applicant's entering into a zipper contract regarding the access on Coburg Road. <br />The contract would be similar in nature to the contract entered into by the City and <br />Rhombus Corporation for the Parkway-Willamette Development. The zipper contract pro- <br />vision would allow the city recourse should access become hazardous beyond the stages <br />of Site Review approval. <br /> <br />.'Vi. <br />.~- ~; <br /> <br />Public hearing was closed, there being no further testimony. <br /> <br />Jim Saul, Planning, pointed out that the decision in this instance was based on the <br />fact that there was a similarity between this situation and the Parkway-Willamette <br />Development. It would be a matter of Council judgment whether to accept the Planning <br />Commission recommendation as regards the contract with Zellner. <br /> <br />Manager said that the ordinance provides for site review procedures to cover the <br />following concerns: Efficient, workable and safe interrelationships among buildings, <br />parking, circulation, open space and landscaped areas as well as related activities <br />and uses; structures designed, sized and shaped in scale and harmony with intended <br />uses and resulting in a pleasant environment for working or shopping; safe and efficient <br />ingress, egress and on-site traffic circulation for pedestrian and bicycle traffic, <br />as well as for automobile traffic. There is no provision in the ordinance for <br />revocation of right or ingress and egress. <br /> <br />.1 <br /> <br />Mr. Williams expressed discomfort with a revocable right of ingress and egress on <br />the site. <br /> <br />Council Bill No. 505 - Rezoning to C-2SR area west of Coburg Road north of Country <br />Club Road (Zellner)(Z 74-5) was read by council bill <br />number and title' only, there being no councilman present requesting that it be <br />read in full. <br /> <br />Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner that the findings of fact in the matter of <br />rezoning to C-2SR area west of Coburg Road north of Country Club Road (Zellner)(Z 74-5) <br />as set forth in Planning Commission minutes dated March 12, 1974, and on file in the <br />City Recorder's Office, be adopted by reference thereto; that the council bil~ be read <br />the second time ,by council bill number only~ with unanimous consent of the CoUncil; ~ <br />and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously 'and the blll <br />was read the second time by council bill number only. <br /> <br />Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner that the bill be approved and given final <br />passage. Rollcall vote. All Council members present voting aye, the bill was declared <br />passed and numbered 17031 <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />C. Vacation of Easement located near the intersection of Laurelhurst & Primrose <br />Planning connnission recommended approval February 11, 1974. The property has been ."" <br />subdivided and the existing easement is recommended for vacation since it no longer <br />applies to the way the area has been parceled out. <br /> <br />Public hearing was held with no testimony presented. <br /> <br />4/22/74 - 2 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />\\3 <br />