Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> cluster ,5ubdI vTs-Ions;---an7Fu-iiTess-fhere'.'wasthe--intenElonto-broa"dentlie require- <br /> ;ment to cover the entire city he would like to bring to the Council samples of <br /> !agreements to accompany the proposed amendments. He pointed out that ownership <br /> I <br /> jin a cluster subdivision would be no different from ownership in any other subdivi- <br /> !sion except that there would be common ground. He said there was no urgency and. e <br /> :if the Council wanted further report he fel tit would be in order to refer the <' <br /> :matter back to the Commission. i <br /> ,In response to Councilwoman Campbell, Mr. Porter said it was possible that separate <br /> lots in a cluster subdivision could be sold to one owner and used for rentals. <br /> i <br /> Mr. Murray moved seconded by Mrs. Beal to schedule public hearing on <br /> the amendments as set out in the Planning Commission's official report. <br /> 'In response to Councilman Williams, Mr. Murray said it was not his intent to include: <br /> in the motion a request for more information with regard to maintenance control at <br /> 'the time of the hearing. He said it would be appropriate to consider if it was I <br /> brought but that the motion would not require that it be written into the ordinance. . <br /> Comm <br /> Vote was taken_",on th.~m(ition as stated~":-:'fi;fion carried unanimously. 7/24/74 <br /> - ~ . - "--" "'"' - ."-'"~' ....~. -.,..- - -- - ---.- -~"'...; ~=....,..~~. .~, - Pub Hrng <br /> -- . . <br /> Official report of the Planning Corrunission (June 24, 1974) was read recommending the code <br /> amendment. Manager explained in response to question rais.ed in committee discussion that <br /> maintenance of semi-private open space would be covered by covenant. requiring signed agree- <br /> ments, recorded with the County, and running with title to the property. Under the cove- e <br /> nant a property owners association in a cluster subdivision would become responsible for <br /> maintenance of open space area, he said,. and if terms were not met then the city could have <br /> the work done and assess the cost to the property. <br /> Gary Chenkin, assisting planning director, said the revision added the requirement for <br /> rezoning to provide for site review procedures where cluster subdivisions were to be <br /> developed, mainly to assure compatibility with. surrounding. areas . It would ats.o limit that <br /> type su'uoivision to four acres.or less with no more than four dwellings per acre. Anything <br /> larger would have to be developed under planned unit procedures. <br /> Public hearing was held with no testimony presented. (0 (!:;- c2) <br /> Council Bill No. 621 - Amending City Code Section 9.550 re: Cluster subdivision in <br /> RA and R-l zones was read by council bill number and title <br /> only, there being no Gouncil members present requesting that it be read in full. <br /> Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner that the bill be read the second time by <br /> council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council and that enactment be <br /> considered at this time. .... <-' ---_. <br /> _. . . ~--~--~-~-:~. <br /> .... --- ... -.- ....:.~...::; -----._--'"' --. _. -.- <br /> 'f , - - '-- '-"'-- - <br /> .- ... . -" <br /> In response to Councilman Wi~liams, Manager said that under this amendment a contractual . <br /> agreement between property owners in a cluster subdivision would require maintenance of ' open- <br /> s?ace property jointly owned and shared. <br /> . Vote was taken on second.reading. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read <br /> the second time by council bill number only. <br /> Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hers4ner that the bill be approved and given final <br /> passage. Rollcall vote. All Council members voting aye, the bill was declared passed <br /> and numbered 17145 <br /> .. . ~_. . -~.... --'- '-- ".---.-. ~ ,.,..-. .._. ... ou,_ __~ .' u"_' '___- .-. - . I .~,.,- m -"'--r" _'" <br /> B. Appeals ,,"'--. ---,'.. -'_.'-~.. ... - "-' '-"'---'" <br /> , 1. RickettS-Baldwin, 2880Willamette - From decision of Sign Code Board of (Of8'/) <br /> Appeals denying a second identity sign on the east building wall (July 15,1974),' <br /> 2~ Nelson Page, 1815 Norkenzie Road - From Planning Commission final approval <br /> of Norkenzie and Minda pun (June 24, 1974). <br /> I <br /> . :~~Comin <br /> \ Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Murray to schedule public hearing on 7/24/,'74 <br /> the appeals at the August 12, 1974 Council meeting. Motion carried / <br /> Pub.Urng <br /> unanimously. ~ <br /> .. <br /> 1. Ricketts Music, 2880 Willamette <br /> Letter from Wayne Wagner of Ricketts Baldwin Piaaos, 2880 Willamette Street, was . <br /> read appealing the July 15, 1974 decision of the -Sign Code Board of Appeals to <br /> deny permit for installation of an identity sign on the eaat building wall at that <br /> loca~ion. Manager explained that the Sign Code permitted only one sign for each <br /> street face of a building in this zone and an identity sign alreadywas in place on <br /> the north wall away from the street. It was determined that the sign on the north <br /> wall had been applied without a permit. Also, in discussion before the Boar<;l of <br /> Appeals, it was revealed that a number of signs in that area erected under permits <br /> I <br /> 8/12/74 - 2 <br /> 215 <br />