My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/22/1986 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1986
>
01/22/1986 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 3:34:32 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:17:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/22/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />--;a <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />M E M 0 RAN DUM <br /> <br />January 22, 1985 <br /> <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />SUBJ: <br /> <br />Mayor and City Council <br /> <br />Planning Department <br /> <br />METRO PLAN MID-PERIOD REVIEW <br /> <br />On January 8, the City Council tabled action on Metro Plan Diagram Amendment <br />B-20, Barger Drive UGB expansion, until the January 22 meeting. The proposed <br />amendment is to expand the Urban Growth Boundary to include 40 acres north of <br />Barger Avenue adjacent to the existing Eugene city limits and to change the <br />Metro Plan designation from Agriculture to Low Density Residential. This is <br />in an area where physical features, such as a river or ridgeline, did not play <br />a significant role in the establishment of the UGB. The subject property <br />contains a single family dwelling and is in farm use. Property to the north, <br />west, and south of the subject property is in farm use. Property to the east <br />of the subject property is developed with single family structures. A map of <br />the subject property and surrounding area is attached. <br /> <br />The Metropolitan Policy Committee recommended approval of B-20 along with the <br />Springfield (5:0) and Eugene (4:2) Planning Commissions. The Lane County <br />Planning Commission (6:0) recommended denial of the amendment because the <br />subject property did not have unique characteristics that justified expansion <br />of the UGB. On January 6, 1986 the Springfield City Council (5:0) recommended <br />denial of the amendment based on lack of applicable LCDC goals analysis. <br /> <br />The UGB has not been altered or expanded since the Metro Plan was acknowledged <br />in 1982. In mid-December 1985, the DLCD indicated that even minor changes to <br />the UGB must be based on the seven factors in the Statewide Goal 14 <br />Urbanization and the Goal 2 Land Use, Part II Exception Standards. Under Goal <br />14, for example, findings need to be developed stating that the land is needed <br />for residential use and will not adversely impact adjacent agricultural land. <br />The exception process, futhermore, requires findings justifying why the <br />agricultural goal does not apply and why the proposed use would be compatible <br />with other adjacent uses. <br /> <br />The data below shows that there is currently no demonstrated need for <br />additional Low-Density Residential land in the metropolitan area. Amendment <br />No. B-20, however, would result in only a .14 % addition to the total supply of <br />Low-Density Residential Land within the UGB. <br /> <br />Total <br />Within UGB <br /> <br />Unincorp. Eugene <br /> <br />Eugene <br /> <br />Total Acres Designated <br />Low-Density Residential <br /> <br />28,216 <br /> <br />7,235 <br /> <br />13 ,043 <br /> <br />Vacant Privately-Owned <br />Acres Designated <br />Low-Density Residential <br /> <br />9,460 <br /> <br />3,460 <br /> <br />3,000 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.