Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />very special district with sidewalks on both sides of the street, brick <br />crossings, trees more often than every 35 feet, and pedestrian level <br />lighting. She said the area should be distinctive to attract tourists. She <br />wondered what process the City could use to make more improvements than in the <br />proposed project. <br /> <br />Mr. Teitzel responded that the improvements were planned with pedestrians in <br />mind. He said he is working with the Planning Department, the Development <br />Department, and the Parks Department to complete a design that will be <br />compatible with a pedestrian corridor from the downtown to the Fifth Street <br />Market. He said the CIP indicates that City funds will not be available for <br />the project until at least 1990. The Public Works Department is trying to get <br />some improvements accomplished with an assessment district. <br /> <br />Answering questions from Councilor Holmer, Mr. Teitze1 said property owners on <br />the south side of Fifth Avenue have not been contacted. The right-of-way on <br />the north side of Fifth Avenue will accommodate a 12-feet-wide sidewalk which <br />will be composed of two, six-foot modules. Trees will be planted in the <br />modules and he will discuss appropriate spacing for the trees with the Parks <br />Department staff. <br /> <br />Responding to questions from Councilor Hansen, Mr. Teitze1 said the zoning on <br />the properties requires a sidewalk from the curb to the property line and the <br />Downtown Plan indicates that the wide sidewalk at the Oregon Electric Station <br />will be continued down the block. If the properties on the south side of <br />Fifth were developed now, a 12-foot sidewalk would be required. The property <br />owners on the north side will pay for the 12-foot sidewalk through an <br />assessment district. The code requires 12-foot sidewalks in commercial areas <br />because there should be enough pedestrian traffic to warrant them. <br /> <br />Mr. Hansen wondered if it is appropriate to take $19,000 from this year's <br />budget and $40,000 in succeeding years when there may be a shortfall in this <br />year's budget. Mr. Teitze1 said that most of the $19,000 would be from <br />pavement rehabilitation funds. <br /> <br />Ms. Wooten said she was excited about the potential for attracting tourists <br />and for making the special district a delightful part of the community. She <br />would like improvements for the entire area to be planned. She wants the area <br />around the South Pacific Train Station to be a beautiful, interesting entrance <br />to Eugene. She wants to encourage pedestrian use and activity along Fifth <br />Avenue. She wondered if a local improvement district would be a better way to <br />fund the improvements than an assessment district. <br /> <br />Councilor Schue agreed that the improvements envisioned by Ms. Wooten would be <br />nice from the train station to the Hu1t Center and on both sides of Fifth <br />Avenue. Ms. Schue said she would agree to spending $19,000 for the project, <br />but she did not think funds should be spent for a more elegant project because <br />of budget constraints and the placement of the project in the CIP. She said <br />starting the project now may encourage more improvements later. <br /> <br />Answering questions from Councilor Miller, Mr. Teitzel said a preliminary <br />design for both sides of Fifth Avenue will be completed before the <br />improvements on the north side of Fifth are constructed. The design will <br />ensure that the improvements are part of a comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />February 24, 1986 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />