Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />much comment, however, about the tenant protections in the ordinance. Most of <br />the comments concerned the tenant protects for the elderly. She said about 25 <br />people attended a public information session held by the staff on January 24, <br />1987. <br /> <br />Answering a question from Mayor Obie, Ms. Brody said the Planning Commission <br />recommendations received by the council are final recommendations. <br /> <br />Robin Johnson, a consultant to the Planning Department, reviewed the history <br />of the condominium conversion ordinance. She said the conversion of <br />apartments to condominiums became an issue in 1979. The City imposed a <br />temporary moratori um on convers ions in November of 1979 and the council <br />adopted the existing ordinance six months later. She said the City has <br />processed applications to convert four developments (440 units) to <br />condominiums since the ordinance was passed in 1980. No units in any of those <br />developments have been sold. She said the State also has a process which must <br />be completed before buildings can be converted to condominiums and the State <br />process has not been started for any of the four developments. The City <br />received applications to convert 230 additional units to condominiums but the <br />City process for those units has not been completed. <br /> <br />Ms. Johnson said the condominium conversion ordinance was amended in 1981 to <br />exempt limited-equity cooperatives. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Ms. Johnson reviewed a report titled, IICondominium Converson Ordinance, <br />Planning Commission Recommendations." The report contains an explanation of <br />statements in the existing condominium conversion ordinance, the State law <br />concerning condominiums conversions, and the Planning Commission <br />recommendations for revisions to the existing ordinance. The report is <br />divided into three sections. They are: 1) purchaser protections; <br />2) administration and procedures; and 3) tenant protections. Ms. Johnson <br />reviewed the provisions in the existing ordinance, the State law, and the <br />changes recommended by the Planning Commission as well as the reasons for the <br />provisions. <br /> <br />A. Purchaser Protections <br /> <br />1. Di scl osure <br /> <br />Ms. Johnson said the Planning Commission recommended the proVlslons in the <br />existing ordinance that require a developer to make all issued documents <br />available to purchasers prior to sale closure be retained. The commission <br />also recommended that a short summary of purchaser protections prepared by the <br />City be given to prospective purchasers with the State Public Report and that <br />the Architects and Engineers Report, documents about the reserve accounts, and <br />the Building Code Report be delivered to purchasers within ten days after <br />execution of the earnest money agreement. <br /> <br />2. Resale <br /> <br />Ms. Johnson said the Planning Commission recommenped the deletion of the <br />requirement in the existing ordinance that subsequent purchasers of a <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />January 28, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br />