Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />Riverfront Research Park Commission with regard to the Master Site Plan. Ms. <br />Briner said the groups' decisions were not binding on the Carley Group, but <br />would go through a formal review process. <br /> <br />Responding to questions from Mr. Rutan, Ms. Briner said important points <br />upcoming in the process included the Master Site Plan process and the signing <br />of an agreement with the developer. Mr. Lutes added that preparation and <br />determination of costs would occur before the site plan was purchased. <br />Responding to questions, Ms. Briner said it was possible that the project <br />still might not proceed or that the developer might be changed. <br /> <br />Ms. Ehrman asked when the installation of sewers was scheduled to occur. Mr. <br />Lyle said about $100,000 for those improvements was included in next year's <br />Capital Improvements Program. Mr. Lutes said installation would occur during <br />the next construction season. <br /> <br />Mayor Obie said he had heard from citizens who were concerned about the <br />difficulty of keeping up with the public process. He asked whether it was <br />necessary for citizens to attend every meeting in order to maintain a <br />position. Ms. Briner said several opportunities remained for receiving public <br />comment, including the third master site plan forum, tonight's hearing, a <br />public hearing on the zone change before the hearings official, and review of <br />the master site plan by several bodies. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Rutan asked about involvement of the governor. Ms. Briner said that had <br />been scheduled to occur during investigation and identification of funding <br />sources. She said Tax Increment District funds would not be sufficient, <br />especially in the early years, and staff therefore was working on State and <br />Federal funding sources. Ms. Briner said the governor currently had signed a <br />$500,000 agreement for preliminary engineering work, which would be included <br />in next year's budget. She said remaining funds had not been secured, but <br />indications were that they would be available. <br /> <br />Mayor Obie thanked those involved in project efforts. <br /> <br />II. REVISED PROPOSAL ON SEWER USER RATES <br /> <br />Ms. Andersen noted that memos, dated May 7, 1987, described factors <br />contributing to the rate change as wastewater flow, operating budget changes, <br />and inflation. She said the only options that appeared feasible were to <br />increase the rate or to reduce service. Ms. Andersen introduced Mr. Jessie, <br />who reviewed the memos. <br /> <br />Ms. Ehrman asked about differences between actual wastewater flow figures and <br />projections. Mr. Jessie said conservation was a small part of the difference, <br />with the main part being caused by errors in projections based on EWEB <br />consumption rates for commercial and industrial users. <br /> <br />Mr. Rutan asked whether the City had incurred an operating deficit because it <br />had underbilled or whether it was looking ahead to the need for a rate <br />increase. Mr. Jessie said both were accurate. He said the City had received <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council Dinner/Work Session <br /> <br />May 11, 1987 Page 2 <br />