Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Overpark, and the debt service for the Parcade was covered by the tax <br /> increment (or Tax Allocation) district. <br /> e Mr. Byrne said the City currently leased spaces in parking structures for $20 <br /> to $40 per month, which was directly related to the cost of providing service. <br /> He added that if debt service were included, those costs probably would <br /> increase to about $75 per month per space, which the market would not bear. <br /> Mr. Byrne explained that spaces in the Overpark were cheaper than those in the <br /> Parcade because of facility size and the lack of debt service. <br /> Mr. Byrne said the monthly market rate was a different fee than the cost of <br /> providing services, but on average they were similar amounts. <br /> Responding to Mr. Bennett's questions, Mr. Byrne said a monthly fee of $10 to <br /> $12 per space was charged for surface lot parking. He said the fees varied <br /> from lot to lot, and the City attempted to price spaces based on the private- <br /> sector costs of surrounding lots. Mr. Bennett asked whether the fees were <br /> based on the market or on the cost of services, and he asked how management of <br /> the properties would compare if they were privately owned. Mr. Byrne sa i d <br /> surface parking probably could attract higher rates on the private market, <br /> assuming a market existed. He said some surface lots gradually had been <br /> returned to the private market, but the City had attempted to avoid flooding <br /> the market with supply. He said the Downtown Commission last year had begun <br /> offering permits for one-quarter block of parking at a monthly rate of $18 per <br /> space. Mr. Byrne said about half of that lot had been sold, and other lots <br /> could be returned to the market in the future. He said public fees were based <br /> on market rates, and fees charged to the Downtown Development District were <br /> based on the cost of providing space in each facility, with average rates <br /> e being similar. <br /> Mr. Byrne showed the connection and overlap between the Eugene Performing Arts <br /> Center (EPAC) garage and the General Fund, noting that the debt service for <br /> the garage was paid entirely out of the General Fund. Ms. Schue asked how <br /> close the facility's income came to covering costs and debt service. Mr. <br /> Byrne said the income covered costs and provided a replacement reserve but did <br /> not come close to covering the debt service. Mayor Obie asked whether that <br /> was the program's original design. Mr. Byrne said he believed it was not the <br /> original design. <br /> Mr. Byrne said the renewal expansion project included plans for the EPAC <br /> garage to support other development in the surrounding area on a fee basis as <br /> new development took place. He said the site had been acquired through the <br /> Urban Renewal program, and the renewal agency should consider that facility an <br /> asset for future private development within the renewal district. <br /> Mr. Byrne showed the overlap and relationships between the Tax Allocation Fund <br /> and the funds for the Eugene Community Conference Center and its parking <br /> garage. He said the debt services for both funds were part of the urban <br /> renewal project, and the Tax Allocation Fund paid the entire debt service. <br /> Mr. Byrne said the garage served the conference center and the Hilton hotel, <br /> with fees charged for special events or monthly permits. He said contract <br /> sta ffi ng of the garage booth had been discontinued because expenses had <br /> e MINUTES--Eugene City Council December 2, 1987 Page 3 <br />