Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4It annexation, as recognized under ORS Chapter 199, and the proposal met the <br />criteria for annexations given in the Eugene Code, as covered in staff <br />notes. <br /> <br />Mr. Bjorklund said the subject area was scheduled for significant Capital <br />Improvement Projects, including an extension of Beltline Road, between <br />FY91 and FY93. The proposal also met Eugene Code criteria for zone <br />changes as discussed in the staff notes, he added. <br /> <br />Mr. Bjorklund said the proposed zoning was consistent with the intent of <br />the Metro Plan and the Willow Creek Special Area Study, the refinement <br />plan for the area. He said the Willow Creek Plan showed land-use <br />designations to be delineated in part by the future extension of Beltline <br />Road. Because that exact alignment was unknown at this time, and because <br />owners of developable property were not prepared to proceed with <br />development, staff proposed rezoning most of the area to equivalent <br />zoning as a "holding zone," which would ensure that any development would <br />be less intensive than that allowed by the plan designation. Mr. <br />Bjorklund said the equivalent zoning would have one exception, a portion <br />of Tax Lot 1700, which staff recommended rezoning to 1-2 to conform with <br />the Willow Creek Plan. He said that portion of the proposed area clearly <br />was not consistent with the Willow Creek Plan, and staff recommended <br />providing conformity. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Bjorklund said the Planning Commission at its December 1 hearing had <br />delayed action and requested motions allowing the exclusion of some <br />residential properties. At the commission's December 14 meeting, staff <br />had stated that sewer assessments would be delayed, and the commission <br />had recommended including all residential properties. He said the <br />commission did not wish to set a precedent of excluding residential <br />properties in response to testimony and had felt that the delay in sewer <br />assessments, along with other available programs, would significantly <br />mitigate the financial burden that residential owners spoke to in the <br />public hearing. <br /> <br />No ex parte contacts or conflicts of interest were declared. <br /> <br />Mayor Obie opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />John O'Connell, 2963 Willow Creek Road, spoke in opposition to the <br />annexation request. Mr. OIConnell said he had spoken to the Planning <br />Commission on December 1, 1987. He said he felt the annexation request <br />was unconstitutional and would deprive residents of their constitutional <br />rights. He said residents of the area did not want to be included in the <br />City at this time. <br /> <br />Mr. O'Connell said annexation would present a hardship to many people, <br />and residents had received no guarantee about future assessments. He <br />said taxes would increase with annexation and might not break his <br />business, but it certainly would not help. He said businesses in the <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />M1NUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />January 11, 1988 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />